202 replies to this topic

[badeskov]

TheMacGuffin, on 07 September 2012 - 07:21 PM, said:

<snip>

In the video, Kaku denied it was an asteroid or comet.  Why did he say that?  Didn't he say that speed was too slow for an asteroid or comet?  That's why I posted the video, so Prof. Kaku could tell us that it wasn't a natural object.

Absolute and utter nonsense. Just because Michiu Kaku thinks the speed is too slow for it to be an asteroid or a comet, how on Earth do you come to the conclusion that it is not natural? You are making completely unfounded conclusions based on ignorance. Just because it doesn't conform to something common in space, it has to be artificial.

Good grief.

Cheers,
Badeskov

[TheMacGuffin]

badeskov, on 08 September 2012 - 05:41 PM, said:

We know. You have more than adequately demonstrated an abhorrence towards anything factual and/or rational that tends to go against your ET belief.

For someone who claims to know a great deal about UFOs and ETs, you always end up saying very little.  If you really know something, why don't you tell them about the small humanoids--the ones we came across first.  If you don't even know where it all started, then how can you claim to have a great deal of knowledge about this subject?

Even I know about those, if not all the other types.

Edited by TheMacGuffin, 08 September 2012 - 06:06 PM.

[TheMacGuffin]

badeskov, on 08 September 2012 - 05:46 PM, said:

Absolute and utter nonsense. Just because Michiu Kaku thinks the speed is too slow for it to be an asteroid or a comet, how on Earth do you come to the conclusion that it is not natural? You are making completely unfounded conclusions based on ignorance. Just because it doesn't conform to something common in space, it has to be artificial.

I'm just going by what he said on the video.  Let other people watch it and they'll see what I mean.  They had no idea what it was and were just guessing about some kind of asteroid collision.  

They didn't even have the date right for THAT, as I have proven.

[TheMacGuffin]

Horus Christos, on 08 September 2012 - 04:49 PM, said:

Nice try BMK, but as you know its hard to argue with people who "know" they are right and can prove it by explaining that any facts presented to refute their "gut feelings" are part of a governmental cover-up.  They are something like religious fanatics..you can't prove to them that they are wrong because they simply refuse to acknowledge the possibility that they can be wrong. It must be nice to be so narrow-minded so as to be convinced that you can never be wrong (mmmm...that reminds me of my ex, who has never admitted to being wrong in her life either)

That's not true either, no matter how many times you repeat it.  You will never make a religious believer out of me no matter how many times you post such things.

I have often been wrong, but I also like to point out where others are wrong, and in this case their "official explanations" have quite a few holes in them.

[TheMacGuffin]

bmk1245, on 08 September 2012 - 05:35 PM, said:

... or he is just fooling around angry of "evil" skeptics. On the other hand, making such a blooper with putting his own words into  M.Kaku's mouth... damn, even Gary t.R. and Beetlejuice  would spot that...

Every article I've looked at gives the same speed for the alleged "asteroid collision" and I have seen no other numbers given.  I can tell that they really had no idea what it was and they were just guessing, which is really what Kaku was doing in the video.

Given the history of UFOs, there are excellent reasons to be skeptical of all "official explanations" of the type regularly repeated on here, and that's what I do.  You didn't even have the right date for the supposed "asteroid collision" but I have never seen you admit that.

Indeed, it's the "skeptics" on here who NEVER admit they are wrong, not even on one single UFO case.  I don't blame them because they do not dare to concede that we may be correct even on a single one of these, which puts them in an impossible position.  So just go ahead and keep doing what you usually do, but we shall let others make up their minds about what the real evidence indicates.

[DONTEATUS]

It would be nice if it started to slow down Now that would open a few eyes,and ears !
Get met a camera !

[bmk1245]

TheMacGuffin, on 08 September 2012 - 06:08 PM, said:

I'm just going by what he said on the video.  Let other people watch it and they'll see what I mean.  They had no idea what it was and were just guessing about some kind of asteroid collision.  
[...]

They made a hypothesis, and then run with observations/calculations. With pre-discovery observations it makes clear - asteroid.

TheMacGuffin, on 08 September 2012 - 06:08 PM, said:

[...]They didn't even have the date right for THAT, as I have proven.

Dude, I'd love to have that fairy dust you are snorting. What date you are talking about? Discovery of already impacted asteroid, or the date of the impact?

[DONTEATUS]

ITs the air in here bmk, ITs makes the grey matter do strange things ! just Look at me !

[TheMacGuffin]

bmk1245, on 08 September 2012 - 06:22 PM, said:

Dude, I'd love to have that fairy dust you are snorting. What date you are talking about? Discovery of already impacted asteroid, or the date of the impact?

You said that the alleged "collision" occurred on February 10, 2010, then backtracked when I pointed out that they already had pictures of this UFO flying around a month before that.  Of course, you were just citing one of your "scientific" sources.  

Go back and look at your own posts.

[bmk1245]

TheMacGuffin, on 08 September 2012 - 06:16 PM, said:

Every article I've looked at gives the same speed for the alleged "asteroid collision" and I have seen no other numbers given.  I can tell that they really had no idea what it was and they were just guessing, which is really what Kaku was doing in the video.
[...]

The same way astronomers come up with approx. time of supernovaes explosions -  you have only aftermath picture.

TheMacGuffin, on 08 September 2012 - 06:16 PM, said:

[...]
Given the history of UFOs, there are excellent reasons to be skeptical of all "official explanations" of the type regularly repeated on here, and that's what I do.  You didn't even have the right date for the supposed "asteroid collision" but I have never seen you admit that.
[...]

You do squat. You browse for any case on the net and put here... And the date of collision... Boy, your personality really encompass every "wrong" what is flooded nowadays (and past) UFOlogy. Do you understand difference between "time of discovery" and "time of collision"? Obviously, not.

TheMacGuffin, on 08 September 2012 - 06:16 PM, said:

[...]
Indeed, it's the "skeptics" on here who NEVER admit they are wrong, not even on one single UFO case.  I don't blame them because they do not dare to concede that we may be correct even on a single one of these, which puts them in an impossible position.  So just go ahead and keep doing what you usually do, but we shall let others make up their minds about what the real evidence indicates.

Wrong? Hah, you twisted M.Kaku's words for your own benefit. Are you really that desperate?

Edit: missing word

Edited by bmk1245, 08 September 2012 - 06:43 PM.

[bmk1245]

TheMacGuffin, on 08 September 2012 - 06:29 PM, said:

You said that the alleged "collision" occurred on February 10, 2010, then backtracked when I pointed out that they already had pictures of this UFO flying around a month before that.  Of course, you were just citing one of your "scientific" sources.  

Go back and look at your own posts.

And another mishap/misreading on your side: the quote/link says February 10, 2009. Problems with numericals, huh? But hey, you always can put links to my posts to prove your points.

[badeskov]

TheMacGuffin, on 08 September 2012 - 06:08 PM, said:

I'm just going by what he said on the video.  Let other people watch it and they'll see what I mean.  They had no idea what it was and were just guessing about some kind of asteroid collision.  
...

Patently false. You, as usual, overlaid it your own biased and flawed interpretation.

TheMacGuffin, on 07 September 2012 - 07:21 PM, said:

<snip>

In the video, Kaku denied it was an asteroid or comet.  Why did he say that?  Didn't he say that speed was too slow for an asteroid or comet?  That's why I posted the video, so Prof. Kaku could tell us that it wasn't a natural object.

Bolding mine. You put words in Michiu Kaku's mouth based on your own beliefs and lack of knowledge. You cannot get around that. You have AGAIN shown your bias and ability to overlay your own beliefs onto unknowns.

Cheers,
Badeskov

[badeskov]

TheMacGuffin, on 08 September 2012 - 06:05 PM, said:

For someone who claims to know a great deal about UFOs and ETs, you always end up saying very little.

Because I don't say what you like to hear, sure.

Quote

If you really know something, why don't you tell them about the small humanoids--the ones we came across first.

Because they are non-existent outside of your rather vivid imagination.

Quote

If you don't even know where it all started, then how can you claim to have a great deal of knowledge about this subject?

Oh, but I do...

Quote

Even I know about those, if not all the other types.

What are you smoking?

Cheers,
Badeskov

[badeskov]

bmk1245, on 08 September 2012 - 06:42 PM, said:

And another mishap/misreading on your side: the quote/link says February 10, 2009. Problems with numericals, huh? But hey, you always can put links to my posts to prove your points.

Great posts, BMK. Thanks for the info.

Cheers,
Badeskov

[bmk1245]

DONTEATUS, on 08 September 2012 - 06:25 PM, said:

ITs the air in here bmk, ITs makes the grey matter do strange things ! just Look at me !

Nah, it looks purplish to me... Of course, having in mind red wine consumed (beer-verbotten). OK, I see Big D... where is the cooker?