TheMacGuffin, on 08 July 2012 - 02:35 AM, said:
Yes, I did, when I was in the Army. I'd say their eyes were almond-shaped, but I only saw their heads and upper bodies in the pictures. I can't tell you how many knees they had or anything like that. I didn't see full body pictures or any report of an examination or autopsy, just pictures of them dead.
They looked like they had broken their necks from the impact. At least, if they were human that's what I would have said.
The eyes were something like these, but here again the head and cranium are too large and out of proportion.

Mac this is interesting to put it mildly.
First I am impressed that in light of your claim, no one here has flamed you. That's something I admire about the members (in general) on this forum.
I have questions about this:
What was your job in the army that would require you to have a need to know about this? and what clearance level was this given?
What was the general subject of this lecture when you were informed of this?
I am curious about how widely the army would disseminate this information, so how many others would have attended this lecture?
I'm not asking these questions because I doubt you. I am just curious that you have presented your experience here in such a matter-of-fact or no-big-deal manner.
Edited by synchronomy, 12 September 2012 - 06:00 PM.
At the heart of science is an essential balance between two seemingly contradictory attitudes--an openness to new ideas, no matter how bizarre or counterintuitive they may be, and the most ruthless skeptical scrutiny of all ideas, old and new.
This is how deep truths are winnowed from deep nonsense. -- Carl Sagan