LOL, peer reviewed? An abuse of the term. Every so-called peer-reviewed article has been published in their own “peer reviewed” journal (BIO-Complexity), based on “research” from their own creation science lab (Biologic Institute), and then promoted by their own “peer reviewed” vanity press operation (Discovery Institute Press).
From the provided extract:
Information signal? But where is this message? It seems they did not actually find one to support the claim. What they did find was some organisation, like we see in the periodic table of elements, which I do feel is hardly proof of intelligent design. It's just creationist claptrap peer reviewed by creationists. You have to pay to read the entire thing, so I'll only bother with the extract for the moment. If anyone wants to pay for this (Zoser? Nah, that would be reading, something akin to learning) I do not mind having a red hot crack at tearing holes right through the entire article when time permits.
I have linked the above places (I'll refrain from using an adjective associated with learning for the moment) that "peer reviewed" this article, I suggest everyone has a click and a read. It's Zoser level garbology mate. All anti Darwin and Deity driven nonsense.
Edited by psyche101, 05 April 2013 - 03:56 AM.