Jump to content


- - - - -

100-million-year-old oyster to be scanned

oyster pearl

  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1    Still Waters

Still Waters

    Deeply Mysterious

  • 31,990 posts
  • Joined:01 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • Que Sera, Sera - Whatever will be, will be..

Posted 07 June 2012 - 02:15 PM

Quote

A gigantic oyster fossil that was accidentally trawled up by fishermen is to be MRI-scanned to see if it contains an enormous pearl.

The prehistoric mollusc is more than 100million years old and is ten times bigger than a regular oyster shell.

It was hauled up in the Solent and found in the nets of the trawler boat when it returned to port.

After layers of mud were washed off, it was clear the item was a huge fossilised shell that measured seven inches wide and three inches thick.

http://www.dailymail...gest-pearl.html
Posted Image

#2    ThePhantomFlanFlinger

ThePhantomFlanFlinger

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,313 posts
  • Joined:22 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 07 June 2012 - 02:29 PM

Id love to see someone try to swallow that down whole....

#3    Old Man Waffles

Old Man Waffles

    Psychic Spy

  • Closed
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,474 posts
  • Joined:01 May 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 07 June 2012 - 03:24 PM

:D I WANT THAT PEARL ON A NECKLACE.

#4    Paracelse

Paracelse

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,074 posts
  • Joined:02 Mar 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:France

Posted 07 June 2012 - 03:26 PM

View PostInsightful Waffles, on 07 June 2012 - 03:24 PM, said:

:D I WANT THAT PEARL ON A NECKLACE.
Women pfuiiiiiiiiiii :P :whistle: :whistle:
Those who would sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither Benjamin Franklin
République No.6
It's time for a sixth republic.

#5    cenobite

cenobite

    Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 962 posts
  • Joined:28 Apr 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:england

  • old age and treachery will always overcome youth and enthusiasm

Posted 08 June 2012 - 03:07 PM

Ive given a few pearl necklace's in my time

#6    pallidin

pallidin

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,613 posts
  • Joined:09 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere south of the North Pole

  • "When life gets you down... swim with a dolphin"

Posted 08 June 2012 - 04:45 PM

How can something that's a secretion over an irritant be valuable?
Oh wait, I forgot about amber.

#7    Troublehalf

Troublehalf

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 84 posts
  • Joined:08 Feb 2012

Posted 08 June 2012 - 05:47 PM

Not only will the oyster be shut solid, anything inside will be inedible.....

If there is a gem inside, it will be the biggest jewellery worthy pearl in the world. There are two types, iridescent (which means rainbow coloured/flux) and ones like the Pearl of Allah which is technically a pearl but is not used in jewellery due to it not having the iridescent (by not being covered in Mother of Pearl) and also being ugly anyway. Pearl of Allah is 14lb (Shame America uses this system, it's outdated and stupid) which is 6350g (6.35kg)... This one could make a great centre gem for a necklace or a ring or something. Wonder if it'll be sold or donated somewhere.

#8    pallidin

pallidin

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,613 posts
  • Joined:09 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere south of the North Pole

  • "When life gets you down... swim with a dolphin"

Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:04 PM

I agree. The Pearl of Allah, in the pic I saw, is one ugly piece of oyster vomit.
$60 million? I wouldn't give 60 cents.

#9    Likely Guy

Likely Guy

    Undecided, mostly.

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,579 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Likely, B.C., Canada

  • "What we've got here is failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach." - Strother Martin

Posted 09 June 2012 - 02:06 AM

So which came first, the oyster or the pearl?

#10    Englishgent

Englishgent

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,909 posts
  • Joined:24 Sep 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bangkok Thailand

  • all dinosaurs are thin at one end, much, much thicker in the middle, then thin again at the far end -- Monty Python

Posted 09 June 2012 - 02:24 AM

Just a couple of things here.
Firsty, only one in a thousand (approx) oysters contains a pearl so the chances of this fossil having one are slim.
Secondly, if there was a pearl inside, then I doubt it would be in very good condition having undergone fossilisation.  I could be wrong on this one.  Still be worth something though :)

In answer to Palladin, Amber is not really a secretion over an irritant, unless you could call a break, fracture or cut in the tree's bark (which allowed the secretion of sap millioins of years ago which then formed amber)  But I am sure you know this already :)

#11    Shrine Builder

Shrine Builder

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 527 posts
  • Joined:18 Apr 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lancaster, SC

  • Warning: Posts may contain the lack of sanity, alcoholism, sexism, and overall offensive materials.

Posted 09 June 2012 - 02:53 AM

I can't be the only one that thinks it's wrong to crack the oyster open.  I mean, christ, it's 100 millions years old.  Keep it preserved.

Posted Image

Follow the footsteps and unlock the door
The giant you face has awakened


#12    Likely Guy

Likely Guy

    Undecided, mostly.

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,579 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Likely, B.C., Canada

  • "What we've got here is failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach." - Strother Martin

Posted 09 June 2012 - 03:46 AM

View PostShrine Builder, on 09 June 2012 - 02:53 AM, said:

I can't be the only one that thinks it's wrong to crack the oyster open.  I mean, christ, it's 100 millions years old.  Keep it preserved.
I agree. After all, it's totally inedible. Then again, I find fresh oysters gross.Unless, of course there's copious amounts of butter and garlic involved. But, then again, considering the oyster is 100 million y.o., there isn't enough butter and garlic in the world.Tough call.

#13    csspwns

csspwns

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 636 posts
  • Joined:07 Apr 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Francisco, CA

  • "Give a man a fish, and you'll feed him for a day; give him a religion, and he'll starve to death while praying for a fish."

Posted 09 June 2012 - 03:58 AM

why are pearls worth so much? imo amber should be worth more cuz its pretty ;)

#14    Englishgent

Englishgent

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,909 posts
  • Joined:24 Sep 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bangkok Thailand

  • all dinosaurs are thin at one end, much, much thicker in the middle, then thin again at the far end -- Monty Python

Posted 09 June 2012 - 04:21 AM

View Postcsspwns, on 09 June 2012 - 03:58 AM, said:

why are pearls worth so much? imo amber should be worth more cuz its pretty ;)

I agree. I have never liked pearls but I love amber, specially with an insect embedded inside. It is much nicer to look at too.
Actually, amber is probably worth more than cultured/fram pearls, whcih are still natural pearls except that an irritant is introduced in order to form a pearl whereas what I would call 'real' pearls are much harder to find hence the higher price. :)

#15    Lava_Lady

Lava_Lady

    Hypochondriac Extrodinaire

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,128 posts
  • Joined:20 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Hawai'i

  •  I will not stand idly by while you abrogate my plans! You shall rue this day!... Well, go on, start ruing! -Stewart Gilligan Griffin

Posted 14 June 2012 - 08:49 AM

Quote

Pearl of Allah is 14lb (Shame America uses this system, it's outdated and stupid) which is 6350g (6.35kg)... This one could make a great centre gem for a necklace or a ring or something. Wonder if it'll be sold or donated somewhere.

Who, in their right mind, would want to wear a 14lb pearl as a center gem for a necklace or ring or anything?  I dont think even Mr. T would want something like that.

"The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function."  - F. Scott Fitzgerald






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users