joc, on 22 October 2012 - 01:09 PM, said:
Wikipedia? Really? Okay. I just have a different mind set I guess. I tend to think outside of the 'general information box'.
As i said, i used it because it happened to be the very first link and Google showed the first few lines and they happened to be what I knew virtually every other source of the definition would be, and i didn't want to search for "Stanford University's" definition just to make it somehow seem more relevant. It would have been the same thing.
If you believe there is a different definition then you are free to search for it. I already knew what the definition was and was only getting it because you didn't seem to understand what consciousness meant..
joc, on 22 October 2012 - 01:09 PM, said:
Consciousness isn't something produced by the brain...it is something that just Is. When we are in a conscious state...it means we are aware of our surroundings and processing information in real time...but Consciousness exists without the body, without the brain.
If consciousness exists without the body, then it obviously exists without the blood too.
joc, on 22 October 2012 - 01:09 PM, said:
I have other questions. Again, we have a corpse and we have living oxygenated blood. Now, we all know that blood can be frozen, and re transfused into a living patient. But how do we know that if it is living and oxygenated that it is not experiencing consciousness? Without the blood...the brain doesn't function. Yet, without the brain, the blood can function.
Blood "functions" only by the fact that it is not "dead." A liver can also "function" without the brain as can a heart or kidney or anything else that can be put in another living human being. Heck, the recent 'transplant" of a face show that a face can still function without a brain. Skin grafts are almost the same thing as blood transfusions.
joc, on 22 October 2012 - 01:09 PM, said:
Pehaps the blood IS the living entity. Perhaps the blood is not just the carrier of nutrients and oxygen to the brain. Perhaps the soul purpose of the body and brain is to house the Blood. There are many other questions...but I will just say now that the studies are inconclusive.
Well, belief that if you wish. As i said before that is crazy and would take too long to counter and would be a colossal waste of time to try. If you are enamored with that idea then that's great. I'm not looking to win any arguments. I am only looking to add to this discussion wherever I might prove to have something to add. Talking about blood having consciousness is definitely not worth my spending any more time on.
joc, on 22 October 2012 - 01:09 PM, said:
I just had a wild thought. What if...the 'other side' is the actual 'real world' and we are numb to it by our addiction to oxygen? And what part does Gravity play in Conscious Awareness?
There are other questions.
Short answers that echo my personal convictions and those of countless accomplished mystics throughout history (so take them or leave them as you wish):
The "other side" IS the "real word" (which is why almost all near-death experiencers describe a "hyper-reality" that makes our existence here seem like a dream rather than reality). And "addiction to oxygen" plays no part other than until we stop breathing we will never understand that (unless "death" is experienced prior to that via NDE or mystical pursuits).
"Gravity" has nothing to do with consciousness.
.
Seeker79, on 22 October 2012 - 01:21 PM, said:
a receiver of conciousness. Much like a radio tuned in.
Seeker79, on 22 October 2012 - 01:21 PM, said:
a receiver of conciousness. Much like a radio tuned in.
Exactly.