Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Is this the Loch Ness Monster?

loch ness monster nessie george edwards

  • Please log in to reply
115 replies to this topic

#76    Cyaneyed

Cyaneyed

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 363 posts
  • Joined:27 May 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kernow, England

  • Yeah, then you woke up with your head in your cornflakes.

Posted 11 August 2012 - 01:57 AM

What struck me reading this thread was: "Wow, people are still ripping on poor old DC?'

Edited by Cyaneyed, 11 August 2012 - 02:00 AM.



"Even real sounds like a zero to a brain in lip sync"


#77    orangepeaceful79

orangepeaceful79

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,461 posts
  • Joined:05 Jan 2012

Posted 11 August 2012 - 02:21 AM

View PostHelen of Annoy, on 10 August 2012 - 10:29 PM, said:

As one of the precious few, scientifically speaking, I can tell this thread contains a lot of “I wish I was making easy money” factor.
It’s almost like you are afraid there could be Nessie, because OMG, in that case that guy would totally make more money than me! And he already has better job than me, because I could cruise around with my boat and feel like I’m not doing anything.
Well, buy a boat then and start easy living.

That man didn’t fake anything. He filmed what he filmed, and it’s up to everyone to decide if that’s a log or Nessie or something else. Obviously. I could think it’s my grandma’s broomstick emerging like Excalibur. So what? What threat is my opinion to you if you have your, scientifically proven log? If I try to aggressively mock you into accepting my opinion, then you may feel threatened and return fire. Like I’m about to do. Because you can have your sceptic log, but you can’t have “lets bully them to reason” festival. Some people do not want it to be a log and you are not appointed to make them see the scientific light. Get over it.

Now, what proof do you have he intentionally advertised a log as Nessie? Being ready yourself to fake something is not a proof someone else is ready to do the same, and especially is not the proof he did it. Neither is guessing people are rotten on the average. Not proof. There are exceptions. Always.

So, how come you, who are so refined and defined proof seekers, are not bothered by the same scientific or legal standards when you are guessing, or channelling maybe, what was going on in someone’s mind at the moment he was filming something in the water?
Why is Nessie something to be proven, while actual human can be arbitrary dismissed as liar or crackpot without proving what exactly he believes he saw?

Nessie is not the issue, guys. Double standards are.

I can speak for myself only, and I was basically jackassing around with my commentary.  ;)


#78    Helen of Annoy

Helen of Annoy

    devil's aunt

  • Member
  • 21,746 posts
  • Joined:21 Jul 2008
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Croatia/Sucamore Beach

  • Where there's a will
    there's a way.

Posted 11 August 2012 - 11:15 AM

View Postorangepeaceful79, on 11 August 2012 - 02:21 AM, said:

I can speak for myself only, and I was basically jackassing around with my commentary.  ;)


I know, what I want is that you go jackass in, say, Goldman Sachs threads, leave guys who have to deal with ****en tourists for living alone.

Posted Image

The 5 millionth post was Junior Chubb's fault :D
Donnie Darko did nothing, but I had to mention him too.

#79    orangepeaceful79

orangepeaceful79

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,461 posts
  • Joined:05 Jan 2012

Posted 11 August 2012 - 03:07 PM

View PostHelen of Annoy, on 11 August 2012 - 11:15 AM, said:

I know, what I want is that you go jackass in, say, Goldman Sachs threads, leave guys who have to deal with ****en tourists for living alone.

All attempts at levity aside.  When it comes to stories like this, and phenomenon like Nessie in general, at the end of the day, there is simply NEVER enough proof to go around for anyone's standpoint.  Its easy enough to supply a motive that the photographer may have had to hoax a picture or even to just be an enthusiastic proponent of something misidentified, but motive is never enough to convict.  Similarly, eyewitness testimony is never enough to convict either.

So can any of us prove that the photographer hoaxed this photo - not likely.   However, it is my opinion that the burden of original proof lies with the photographer and his original claim.  We've had single photos of "something" in Loch Ness for years and years.  Why not a series of photos?  Why not video?  Almost every digital camera these days has the capability to shoot in burst mode, and to record video.  It seems hard to believe that someone with such a demonstrated interest and dedication to Nessie would spend 60 hrs a week on the water and not have provision to take more than one single photo of the beast if he sighted it.

I cannot say that the man hoaxed the photo with any certainty.  I will admit that easily.  Utimately it matters little one way or the other.  Neither side will ever be vindicated.  A body will never turn up, a creature will never be captured - those are the only things that would definitively prove its existence. On the flipside, believers will always hold out hope, which will be periodically buoyed by photos like this one turning up...just tantalizing enough for some to believe in.

I respect your viewpoint Helen, even if I won't go so far as to agree with it.  Perhaps in your life you've seen something enough to help you cross the line of belief.  If so, then I'm actually jealous of you as so far I've not seen enough to make me believe.

Edited by orangepeaceful79, 11 August 2012 - 03:09 PM.


#80    PlanB

PlanB

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 726 posts
  • Joined:12 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

  • Find out what you love and let it kill you.

Posted 13 August 2012 - 06:09 AM

I've always been a fan of Nessie. It was probably the gateway phenomena that led to my interest in the paranormal. Heck, it's probably the reason I learned to read. I cruised from library to library reading grabbing every book as a child and was CONVINCED that it's existence would be proven in my lifetime. Now that I'm old and cynical, it's easy to pass off stuff like this as a way to drum up tourist dollars. I'm torn with "evidence" like this. It's just tantalizing enough to get me holding on to what's left of my waning beliefs. Or maybe an excuse to.

Edited by PlanB, 13 August 2012 - 06:15 AM.


#81    DieChecker

DieChecker

    I'm a Rogue Scholar

  • Member
  • 17,888 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, Oregon, USA

  • Hey, I'm not wrong. I'm just not completely right.

Posted 13 August 2012 - 09:51 PM

View PostCyaneyed, on 11 August 2012 - 01:57 AM, said:

What struck me reading this thread was: "Wow, people are still ripping on poor old DC?'
Well, he was a bit fanatic about seeing Dragons everywhere and everywhen.

Here at Intel we make processors on 12 inch wafers. And, the individual processors on the wafers are called die. And, I am employed to check these die. That is why I am the DieChecker.

At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid. - Friedrich Nietzsche

Qualifications? This is cryptozoology, dammit! All that is required is the spirit of adventure. - Night Walker

#82    AREA__51

AREA__51

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 50 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2012

Posted 13 August 2012 - 10:40 PM

I havent read the whole thread, but the story says "he has even had the picture independently verified by a team of US military monster experts" What exactly is a military monster expert? For the loch ness monster to exist, it needs to reproduce, which would mean there should be hundreds of monsters there, which of course couldnt happen because there isnt a big enough food source to sustain a population of such large creatures.


#83    Night Walker

Night Walker

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,095 posts
  • Joined:23 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Where women glow and men plunder

  • We're all storytellers. We all live in a network of stories. There isn't a stronger connection between people than storytelling.

    J.M. Smith

Posted 22 August 2012 - 06:26 AM

View PostHelen of Annoy, on 10 August 2012 - 10:29 PM, said:

That man didn’t fake anything. He filmed what he filmed, and it’s up to everyone to decide if that’s a log or Nessie or something else. Obviously. I could think it’s my grandma’s broomstick emerging like Excalibur. So what? What threat is my opinion to you if you have your, scientifically proven log? If I try to aggressively mock you into accepting my opinion, then you may feel threatened and return fire. Like I’m about to do. Because you can have your sceptic log, but you can’t have “lets bully them to reason” festival. Some people do not want it to be a log and you are not appointed to make them see the scientific light. Get over it.

Now, what proof do you have he intentionally advertised a log as Nessie? Being ready yourself to fake something is not a proof someone else is ready to do the same, and especially is not the proof he did it. Neither is guessing people are rotten on the average. Not proof. There are exceptions. Always.
So, how come you, who are so refined and defined proof seekers, are not bothered by the same scientific or legal standards when you are guessing, or channelling maybe, what was going on in someone’s mind at the moment he was filming something in the water?

Why is Nessie something to be proven, while actual human can be arbitrary dismissed as liar or crackpot without proving what exactly he believes he saw?

Nessie is not the issue, guys. Double standards are.

UPDATE:

Posted Image
http://lochnessmyste...ards-photo.html

Steve Feltham:

Well that is the George Edwards nessie photograph solved.

Turns out he used a fibreglass hump which was being filmed for inclusion in the National Geographic documentary, "the truth behind the loch ness monster" . If you have a copy of this documentary then the first five minutes should be enough to show you what he did, and the final nail in his story is the shot 5.47minutes in that shows the fake hump on the front of his boat!

Add to this the fact that i now have this fake hump, which is an exact match for the one in his photo, and he is blown right out of the water.... Hoaxer.

Posted Image
Here is George Edwards fake hump in the water at a similar angle to how he had it. Note that it is a perfect match.

Posted Image
This is the actual fibreglass hump that George Edwards photographed, and then tried to pass off as a genuine nessie sighting.

http://www.facebook....s/141086595460/

Posted Image Yes! Canada's most fearsome predator. The Kodiak Marmoset – it's the world's largest smallest primate. "My God! He's killing us..."

The Yowie-ocalypse is upon us...

#84    Junior Chubb

Junior Chubb

    Brick by brick

  • Member
  • 4,989 posts
  • Joined:28 Nov 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

  • I am Junior Chubb, son of the Chubb, father of Chubb III

Posted 22 August 2012 - 10:36 AM

View PostNight Walker, on 22 August 2012 - 06:26 AM, said:

Well that is the George Edwards nessie photograph solved.

Turns out he used a fibreglass hump which was being filmed for inclusion in the National Geographic documentary, "the truth behind the loch ness monster" . If you have a copy of this documentary then the first five minutes should be enough to show you what he did, and the final nail in his story is the shot 5.47minutes in that shows the fake hump on the front of his boat!

Cheers Night Walker, nice to put a lid on things.

I've flown from one side of this galaxy to the other. I've seen a lot of strange stuff, but I've never seen anything to make me believe there's one all-powerful Force controlling everything. There's no mystical energy field that controls my destiny. Anyway, it's all a lot of simple tricks and nonsense.

#85    U. N.Owen

U. N.Owen

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 48 posts
  • Joined:07 Nov 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sometimes Central Russia, sometimes Central United Kingdom.

  • `I am too much of a sceptic to deny the possibilty of anything` T.H. Huxley

Posted 22 August 2012 - 11:51 AM

The first aspect of the photo that first alerted me to its suspicious nature was the strange reddish colour of the hump. I thought this was notable because not a single eye witness report that I can think of speaks of a reddish hue - it is always spoken of being black, grey and, very very rarely greenish.So here is an example of a Nessie -agnostic comparing the picture with alleged sightings -which I do give some credence to -and, that way, reaching a negative conclusion.

Before the career-cynics who dominate this sight rub their hands with glee too much, it is worth considering the following: the two people most responsible for unmasking this probable hoax are Steve Feltham, a dedicated Nessie hunter, and `Glasgow boy` the creator of an excellent pro-Nessie blog.

In fact there has been a history of `Nessie advocates` being the first ones to expose trickery and deceptions involving the monster.The pro-Nessie journalist Nicholas Witchell was quick to denounce the tomfoolery of `Nessie hunter` Frank Searle and his fake photographs.Then it was Martin Boyd, himself a Nessie witness, who wrote the pamphlet that has probably unmasked the (in)famous `Surgeon's Photo`.

Believing in Lake monsters, like getting married, is `a triumph of hope over expectation` - but people still get married.

Edited by U. N.Owen, 22 August 2012 - 11:53 AM.


#86    TheLastLazyGun

TheLastLazyGun

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,144 posts
  • Joined:08 Apr 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The edge of the West Pennine Moors, Northern England

Posted 22 August 2012 - 06:15 PM

View PostJunior Chubb, on 22 August 2012 - 10:36 AM, said:

Cheers Night Walker, nice to put a lid on things.

As someone who has been posting on this forum for many many years (under a different name) I have noticed that there are too many skeptics who, lately, have flooded onto this site and cannot wait to debunk any story or article or personal sighting that is posted.

Gone are the days when we could have fun discussions on UFOs, aliens, ghosts, cryptozoology, time travel and all the other fun things to talk about.  Instead these discussions are ruined by skeptics flooding threads and saying things like "It's just dust" or "It's someone in a Halloween mask" or "It's the wind."

These skeptics like to come onto sites such as this and debunk everything (or THINK they have debunked it).

For example, we have people who think they have proven that Nessie doesn't exist just because someone faked a Nessie photo.

I can't understand why skeptics bother posting on a site about things they aren't interested in.

Edited by TheLastLazyGun, 22 August 2012 - 06:16 PM.


#87    Myles

Myles

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,266 posts
  • Joined:08 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 August 2012 - 06:43 PM

View PostTheLastLazyGun, on 22 August 2012 - 06:15 PM, said:

As someone who has been posting on this forum for many many years (under a different name) I have noticed that there are too many skeptics who, lately, have flooded onto this site and cannot wait to debunk any story or article or personal sighting that is posted.

Gone are the days when we could have fun discussions on UFOs, aliens, ghosts, cryptozoology, time travel and all the other fun things to talk about.  Instead these discussions are ruined by skeptics flooding threads and saying things like "It's just dust" or "It's someone in a Halloween mask" or "It's the wind."

These skeptics like to come onto sites such as this and debunk everything (or THINK they have debunked it).

For example, we have people who think they have proven that Nessie doesn't exist just because someone faked a Nessie photo.

I can't understand why skeptics bother posting on a site about things they aren't interested in.
Being a skeptic does not mean that you are not interested in something.    Skeptics like to disect evidence.   A good scientist is a skeptic.   Believing in everything gets you nowhere.

Would you rather us respond to a statement from nopeda "I saw it on the history channel so it must be true" by typing.    Why yes, I think you are correct.  The History Channel said ancient aliens built the pyramids, so it must be true.


#88    Rafterman

Rafterman

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,578 posts
  • Joined:27 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate

Posted 22 August 2012 - 06:49 PM

It was obvious, wasn't it?

"You can't have freedom of religion without having freedom from the religious beliefs of other people."

#89    Rafterman

Rafterman

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,578 posts
  • Joined:27 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate

Posted 22 August 2012 - 06:52 PM

View PostTheLastLazyGun, on 22 August 2012 - 06:15 PM, said:


For example, we have people who think they have proven that Nessie doesn't exist just because someone faked a Nessie photo.



Like most believers, you have it backwards.

The proof lies with those making the claim.  If I come on here claiming that I routinely have flaming squirrels shooting out of my ass, it's up to me to provide evidence of that.  I can't simply sit back and say "prove that I don't" when someone questions me.

"You can't have freedom of religion without having freedom from the religious beliefs of other people."

#90    Myles

Myles

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,266 posts
  • Joined:08 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 August 2012 - 07:34 PM

View PostRafterman, on 22 August 2012 - 06:52 PM, said:

Like most believers, you have it backwards.

The proof lies with those making the claim.  If I come on here claiming that I routinely have flaming squirrels shooting out of my ass, it's up to me to provide evidence of that.  I can't simply sit back and say "prove that I don't" when someone questions me.
Does it hurt?





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users