Mr Walker, on 05 May 2012 - 01:50 AM, said:
Both those who have chosen to believe in god(s) and those who have chosen not to believe in god(s) have closed minds.(Along, I guess, with people like myself who know god is real, because knowledge closes off both the potential to believe or to disbelieve)
I'm sorry Mr Walker, but I don't buy into this at all. Like it says below my avatar, "You can't just choose to believe something". I did not choose to become an atheist! No matter how much you want to think I (atheists in general) did, I didn't. I didn't go "atheism"......"theism".....I think I'll pick "atheism". It just doesn't work that way.
Quote
That is how beliefs are formed in the absence of proofs or evidences. We chose a position, stick to it, and defend it. Our minds are closed to other alteratives Only agnostics retain open minds on the issue of the existence of god(s),
Ps the belief that gods do not exist is, in fact, a part of a person's world view. It cannot be held independently of other elements of a world view. It will both be informed by, and in turn inform, many other elements of a person's world view. Atheism is not a religion in a theological sense, although it can be folowed religiously, as can footballl or patriotism. It is however a belief, in the exact same neurologial and semantic sense as theism is. And our minds form both beliefs in identical ways, using identical processes. We just chose to interpret the same data (or lack thereof) in differnt ways.
Again, there was no choosing.....none. My mind is not closed to other possibilities. Requiring proof does not equate to a closed mind. It means that we rationalize things.....look for the facts......give us something tangible and most of us will change what we believe. I can't prove that god exists or not, I just know that I've never experienced him. How am I supposed to "choose" to believe when I've never had any experiences with a deity?
I don't really think about atheism that much.....a few conversations with friends or when I'm involved with these threads is all.......so I certainly don't consider it a world view or a religion.
Agnostics to me fall into various categories......Those that don't want their views known, those that don't know which way to go on the issue, and those that just honestly don't care. I don't believe anyone is a straight up agnostic.....everyone leans one way or the other.....
Quote
That is true for people with no personal evidences of god. Those people who do have such personal evidences, apply that personal data to their thoughts and logic. There may be sufficient evidence to be highly suggestive that god (s) exist, or enough to prove it beyond doubt, using the same logic by which we establish the reality of anything.
Personal evidences only mean something to the believer and are not tangible to anyone else, not even another believer. "enough to prove it beyond doubt"....means that very little is required to believe. That opens up belief to a wide range of things......
Quote
A person with no personal evidences of god in their life will find it extremely difficult to communicate with, or understand, one who does. If they believe god does not exist then they are forced to also believe that anyone who caims to know god as a real physical being who intervenes in their life is wrong. Those with such a god god in their life, in turn, KNOW that disbelievers are wrong.
Not difficult to communicate exactly......but difficult to understand though. What's with all of the "wrong" stuff? I don't claim Christians or (pick religion) are wrong! I just honestly don't understand them. I will talk to believers and enjoy talking to some......I just wish someone had the correct words.......
Quote
One can only be polite and understanding in such instances.
Indeed!