Jump to content

Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.

- - - - -

Inflatable spacecraft is missing

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1    Althalus


    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,906 posts
  • Joined:12 Jan 2002
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England

Posted 23 July 2002 - 11:25 AM

An experimental spacecraft with an inflatable heat shield has disappeared during its return to Earth on the remote Kamchatka peninsula in eastern Russia.
"Our landing zone is very big and the craft is very small," says Lionel Marraffa, lead European Space Agency engineer for the project. "The area is populated by only 100 bears and a few soldiers so it may take us days or even weeks to find it."

The experimental craft, which looks like a giant shuttlecock, is designed to massively reduce costs by cutting launch weight and size. Engineers also hope that the craft could form the basis for "lifeboats" on the International Space Station or even escape pods for burning skyscrapers.

Normal spacecraft use thick metal or ceramic heat shields to protect the vehicle during re-entry to the Earth's atmosphere and massive parachutes to slow it down. But these are heavy and bulky.

Instead, the new craft uses an inflatable heat shield made from ceramic fibres and a silicon-based rubber. This also acts as a parachute, slowing descent to a "landing" speed of 50 km/h.

Submarine launch

A Russian submarine launched the Inflatable Re-entry and Descent Technology (IRDT) mission on 12 July. It successfully separated from the launch vehicle at an altitude of 200 km and should then have began its descent to Earth.

But just after separation, controllers from the European and Russian space agencies lost sight of the craft. It is not unusual to lose contact with a spacecraft at this stage as debris, heat and electromagnetic fields can obscure the returning vehicle.

Assuming the craft survived separation, the first stage of the heat shield should then have inflated. It is designed to withstand a re-entry speed of 7 km per second, which generates temperatures in excess of 1000 C. The second stage should have deployed 30 seconds later to further reduce re-entry speed and - in theory - bring the craft to a gentle landing in the target zone.

But engineers fear that the shield may have failed, causing the craft to burn up during re-entry. The first IRDT test craft, launched in February 2000, returned to Earth intact, but at a lower re-entry speed.

"We still have a lot of data to analyse and homework to do," Marraffa told New Scientist . "We're still studying the data to see if we have actually lost contact with the craft. Its signals would be faint and difficult to detect anyway. The search is continuing."

"We make choices everyday, some of them good, some of them bad. And - if we are strong enough - we live with the consequences."
David Gemmell

#2    SpaceyKC


    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,349 posts
  • Joined:06 Mar 2001
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:United States

  • Thank you TO

Posted 23 July 2002 - 04:42 PM

         That sounds like a great idea!  I hope they find it soon!
"The area is populated by only 100 bears and a few soldiers"

         I wonder when the last count was taken?   :s9

"Science may have found a cure for most evils;  but it has
         found no remedy for the worst of them all --- the apathy of human beings."
                                                     Helen Keller

#3    Kira


    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,183 posts
  • Joined:12 Jan 2002
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Leicester England.

  • Sexiest,
    Elf Member of the
    Six Worst Men of the Apfelschnaps.

    Thanks TO xx

Posted 23 July 2002 - 05:08 PM

I t does sound good but this bit worries me:
We're still studying the data to see if we have actually lost contact with the craft.

So they don't know if they've lost it ???
kinda of reminds me of Hunt for Red October 'we think one our subs is missing!? :s01

We do what we do because of who we are. If we did otherwise, we would not be ourselves.

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users