docyabut2 Posted January 6, 2012 #1 Share Posted January 6, 2012 http://life-tabernacle.net/JoeBrandt.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted January 6, 2012 #2 Share Posted January 6, 2012 Very interesting and even chilling. I believe we are spoken to in dreams but whether this account is real? Who can say. Thanks for sharing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted January 6, 2012 Author #3 Share Posted January 6, 2012 (edited) Very interesting and even chilling. I believe we are spoken to in dreams but whether this account is real? Who can say. Thanks for sharing. I would say maybe Joe Brandt read Cayce on the Calif quake before him and it was just suggestion dreams, but dang how did a guy back in 1937 know women would wear really short skirts and men earings? And what about the president that was bushey with big ears. Edited January 6, 2012 by docyabut2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted January 6, 2012 Author #4 Share Posted January 6, 2012 (edited) Here is the whole vision http://www.placesofrefuge.com/main/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=22&Itemid=2 Edited January 6, 2012 by docyabut2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted January 6, 2012 Author #5 Share Posted January 6, 2012 I realize people in alter states can see everything in fast motion, as Cayce said these earth changes would all happen gradully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted January 6, 2012 #6 Share Posted January 6, 2012 How did a guy in 1937 know some day men would wear earings?Because they already did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted January 7, 2012 Author #7 Share Posted January 7, 2012 Because they already did. In 1937? Maybe a few, but not like Brant had described many, more like today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
libstaK Posted January 7, 2012 #8 Share Posted January 7, 2012 You know it almost reads like he had a vision of the movie 2012 - the actual movie not a real life event at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sensible Logic Posted January 8, 2012 #9 Share Posted January 8, 2012 There is a discrepancy between the two versions the first says he thought the paper said 1969 but in the second he doesn't say that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now