OverSword, on 28 November 2012 - 08:50 PM, said:
Is it more offensive to offend the president of 300,000,000 people or the religious focus of nearly 40% of the world? If you use logic this painting is actually more offensive than the obama bobblehead in urine.
Pot stirred. Go!
I am not a religious follower, so its no offense to me personally, but it does show the difference in the religious cults of our world.
I would like to see Michael D`antuano do one of mohammed, and see how many museums put it up without having a death thread on their door step before they can say "can you just straighten it up a little, its wonky"
Edited by freetoroam, 28 November 2012 - 09:49 PM.
In an ideal World a law would be passed were NO guns were allowed and all those out there destroyed, trouble is the law makers are not going to take a risk of trying to pass that without making sure they are armed first.