Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

More planets could harbour life


Waspie_Dwarf

Recommended Posts

More planets could harbour life

New computer models suggest there could be many more habitable planets out there than previously thought.

Scientists have developed models to help them identify planets in far-away solar systems that are capable of supporting life.

Estimates of habitable planet numbers have been based on the likelihood of them having surface water.

But a new model allows scientists to identify planets with underground water kept liquid by planetary heat.

The research was presented at the British Science Festival in Aberdeen.

Water is fundamental for life as we know it.

arrow3.gifRead more...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Fascinating!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The view that life can only be supported by liquid water is quite limiting to the idea of life. There could be creatures made of silicon that evolved naturally, or gaseous creatures that feed on nothing more then stray atoms.

But, I can understand looking at these places first, we'll recognize these creatures easier then we would anything else.

Edited by Hasina
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The view that life can only be supported by liquid water is quite limiting to the idea of life. There could be creatures made of silicon that evolved naturally, or gaseous creatures that feed on nothing more then stray atoms.

But, I can understand looking at these places first, we'll recognize these creatures easier then we would anything else.

And there could be an invisible pixie at the bottom of my garden... but it is unlikely.

Silicon based life is a nice science fiction idea, but the reality is that it is virtually impossible to make the complex molecules necessary for life with silicon. Carbon forms complex molecules extremely easily, there are more organic (carbon based) molecules in the universe than there are inorganic.

The properties of water are also unique. The likelihood of life being able to form where there is no liquid water is vanishingly small.

When scientists say that water is probably necessary for life they do so not because they are limited in the way they think, they do so because they understand the chemistry and the limitations THAT imposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And there could be an invisible pixie at the bottom of my garden... but it is unlikely.

Silicon based life is a nice science fiction idea, but the reality is that it is virtually impossible to make the complex molecules necessary for life with silicon. Carbon forms complex molecules extremely easily, there are more organic (carbon based) molecules in the universe than there are inorganic.

The properties of water are also unique. The likelihood of life being able to form where there is no liquid water is vanishingly small.

When scientists say that water is probably necessary for life they do so not because they are limited in the way they think, they do so because they understand the chemistry and the limitations THAT imposes.

It's basically the same argument everyone uses to support the idea of alien life in the first place; the Universe is a vast, vast place, just because the limitations are there doesn't mean it's impossible. As I do agree with you, carbon molecules, the ones we call organic, are just the more obvious choices because they combine easier with each other. I'll concede the point that silicon life is the stuff of science fiction, no doubt there. But extremophiles were the things of science fiction once as well, anaerobic that don't require oxygen to reproduce, or alkaliphile's who have optimal reproduction in pH's of 9 to 11; true, these are all carbon based organisms, but they show the amazing aptitude for life itself. If there's a sliver of a chance any molecule bonding like carbon or similar to it, I bet it might have happened somewhere at sometime. Will we ever find it? Probably not since it's probably even rarer then carbon life.

Edited by Hasina
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am going to toss this question out while some brains are looking. Could life exist as plasma?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the criteria for something to be life.

1. It reproduces

2. It metabolizes

What else makes something alive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arsenic based is highly likely also. More experiments need to be done but the idea almost became a proven reality from a natural source in California. Though thelady scientist who discovered them is under intense peer review/ scrutiny by the scientific community. We will wait to see how it progresses. She almost threw her career away by publishing too soon.

Pretty sure it was arsenic based may have been sulphur based but I'm very confident that my memory serves me right. Iirc arsenic can be interchangeable with carbon molecules... but deadly to us carbon based....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.