110 replies to this topic

[turbonium]

Frank Merton, on 03 March 2013 - 11:07 AM, said:

Oh is that what this is about; sorry Mac, you are barking up the wrong tree   The man risks his life and has a great historical achievement and some fool tells him he's lying about it.  Yea -- any normal person would haul off and let him have it right between the eyes.

Don't insult your brave hero, because he can't handle the pain!!

I can imagine it now...

'How dare you insult me, The World-Reknown Space Hero!! I shall strike you down for your blasphemies!'

Now everybody bow down and worship Buzz, and all the other Apollo deities.

[skyeagle409]

turbonium, on 03 March 2013 - 11:00 AM, said:

Apollo is 100% genuine, a proven fact?

That is correct! After all, there are countries that have tracked the Apollo moon missions and photographed the Apollo landing sites as well.

[skyeagle409]

turbonium, on 03 March 2013 - 11:55 AM, said:

Some of the Apollo astronauts are very poor liars. They immediately fall apart when they're accused of lying.

In reality, the Apollo astronauts have facts and evidence that back them up.

Quote

SELENE photographs

In 2008, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) SELENE lunar probe obtained several photographs showing evidence of Moon landings

Edited by skyeagle409, 03 March 2013 - 02:00 PM.

[turbonium]

The lunar images show a distinct ohysical feature which is not found in the Apollo close-up images.

Which means Apollo is a fake.

Well done!

[skyeagle409]

turbonium, on 03 March 2013 - 03:09 PM, said:

The lunar images show a distinct ohysical feature which is not found in the Apollo close-up images.

Which means Apollo is a fake.

Well done!

On the contrary, the images confirmed the reality of the Apollo  moon missions. In addition:



So once again, you have been proven wrong.

Edited by skyeagle409, 03 March 2013 - 03:42 PM.

[turbonium]

skyeagle409, on 03 March 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:

On the contrary, the images confirmed the reality of the Apollo  moon missions. In addition:



So once again, you have been proven wrong.

No, the Apollo close-up images prove you're wrong.

LM area lacks the distinct physical feature seen in the orbit images. It proves Apollo was fake

Anyway, let's get back to the issue...


I'm waiting for Czero's proof of Sibrel assaulting Aldrin, etc.

So where is it?

Edited by turbonium, 08 March 2013 - 04:16 AM.

[Czero 101]

turbonium, on 08 March 2013 - 04:00 AM, said:

I'm waiting for Czero's proof of Sibrel assaulting Aldrin, etc.

So where is it?

And I'm waiting for your proof of ANYTHING you have claimed....

So where is it, Mr. Hypocrite-pants...?




Oh, and just in case you were too distracted by your own ignorance - AGAIN - its not my opinion that Sibrel was assaulting Mr. Aldrin, IT WAS THE COURT'S OPINION, so take it up with them.





Cz

Edited by Czero 101, 08 March 2013 - 05:03 AM.

[skyeagle409]

turbonium, on 08 March 2013 - 04:00 AM, said:

No, the Apollo close-up images prove you're wrong.

On the contrary, they proved you wrong. Fact of the matter is, you continue to prove yourself wrong and others have noticed as well.

[turbonium]

Czero 101, on 08 March 2013 - 05:03 AM, said:

And I'm waiting for your proof of ANYTHING you have claimed....

So where is it, Mr. Hypocrite-pants...?




Oh, and just in case you were too distracted by your own ignorance - AGAIN - its not my opinion that Sibrel was assaulting Mr. Aldrin, IT WAS THE COURT'S OPINION, so take it up with them.

Is this a permanent state of childhood regression?

Let's see now..

You never support your claims, because you say I haven't supported mine. You never list any of the claims. You must think I have telepathic powers!

A few emoticons, mix in various loudmouth fonts and mindless insults.  

The only reply on topic shows you lack any proof.

You failed to show that Sibrel assaulted Aldrin.  

You failed to prove Sibrel sued Aldrin.

You say a court dismissed the case, but still show no proof.

[Iron_Lotus]

turbonium, on 09 March 2013 - 01:52 PM, said:

Is this a permanent state of childhood regression?

Let's see now..

You never support your claims, because you say I haven't supported mine. You never list any of the claims. You must think I have telepathic powers!

A few emoticons, mix in various loudmouth fonts and mindless insults.  

The only reply on topic shows you lack any proof.

You failed to show that Sibrel assaulted Aldrin.  

You failed to prove Sibrel sued Aldrin.

You say a court dismissed the case, but still show no proof.

is this all you do now is dodge and run away from questions posed to you?

Edited by Iron_Lotus, 09 March 2013 - 03:14 PM.

[Chrlzs]

I can only judge by what others post (having blocked turbonium ages ago) but it seems we can now add the simple term "assault" to those turbonium doesn't understand.  From Cornell..

Quote

ASSAULT
1.  Intentionally putting another person in reasonable apprehension of an imminent harmful or offensive contact.  No intent to cause physical injury needs to exist, and no physical injury needs to result.  So defined in tort law and the criminal statutes of some states.

2.  With the intent to cause physical injury, making another person reasonably apprehend an imminent harmful or offensive contact.  Essentially, an attempted battery.  So defined in the criminal statutes of some states.

3.  With the intent to cause physical injury, actually causing such injury to another person.  Essentially, the same as a battery.  So defined in the criminal statutes of some states, and so understood in popular usage.

Note the bolded parts...  Turbonium, why do you think the legal term "battery" exists?


I don't post on forums where I don't know the topics at hand - I know very little about, oh say, quantum physics or neurosurgery..  I might go there to ask a question or for references, but I'd rather NOT make a fool of myself by suggesting that neurosurgery was imaginary or quantum entanglement was a hoax and that I knew more than those who were experts - I would simply be revealing my ignorance/delusions.   Even if I did try it, I would take a hint from a total lack of support...

I wonder what we can learn from that?

[Czero 101]

turbonium, on 09 March 2013 - 01:52 PM, said:

Is this a permanent state of childhood regression?

Let's see now..

You never support your claims, because you say I haven't supported mine. You never list any of the claims. You must think I have telepathic powers!

A few emoticons, mix in various loudmouth fonts and mindless insults.  

The only reply on topic shows you lack any proof.

You failed to show that Sibrel assaulted Aldrin.  

You failed to prove Sibrel sued Aldrin.

You say a court dismissed the case, but still show no proof.

Turbs... read this post again... this time with your eyes open... it contains something you're not familiar with: E - V - I - D - E - N - C - E

As for the things you haven't proven...  PICK A TOPIC....any one of them...





Cz

[Colonel Rhuairidh]

Heavens, this thread has become a real testimony to the effects of monomania, hasn't it. One person with an unending obssession has managed to hijack it quite effectively in order to continue to pursue their endless obssession.

[flyingswan]

Lord Vetinari, on 10 March 2013 - 08:15 AM, said:

Heavens, this thread has become a real testimony to the effects of monomania, hasn't it. One person with an unending obssession has managed to hijack it quite effectively in order to continue to pursue their endless obssession.

Maybe he took the title of the thread as a challenge?  If he's equating "worst" to "the one with the weakest arguments", he's certainly making himself a candidate.

[tyrant lizard]

turbonium, on 15 February 2013 - 04:42 AM, said:

Why be so emotional if you've got nothing to hide, or reputation as 'hero' to lose?

So what you're saying is that the only people who are allowed be angry at being called a liar are the people who ARE lying? And the ones who are telling the truth should be quite happy about it? A moronic statement to go with most of your other one's regarding this case