Arbitran, on 15 April 2012 - 07:45 AM, said:
Well, my assertions are anything but "baseless". I wouldn't believe them if they were.
This I will not comment on based on your previous posts and beliefs here.
Quote
I maintain that the evidence from Titan is good evidence for the existence of extraterrestrial life there. Do you disagree?
That is your prerogative and I respect you opinion on this matter. However, that was not what I contesting. I was contesting your notion that the scientists seemingly found it probable.
Arbitran, on 14 April 2012 - 11:12 PM, said:
...but I, and seemingly the scientists, believe that life is the most probable answer.
That is an outright fabrication on behalf of the scientists made to bolster your argument and make it look like the scientists are agreeing with you. In fact, the scientists did not assign probabilities at all - on purpose I am guessing, because they simply do not know. And neither do you.
Are you so naive that you thought that we would not see that or do you simply not understand what the article states? In fact, you didn't read it at all, did you? You Googled some key words, took what looked best from the titles and posted those, didn't you? Frankly, I think the latter given the next part. I don't even think you read it, to be honest.
Quote
I have already requested that you offer an alternative, if you believe you have one that is more probable based on the facts.
There could be many alternatives I am sure (e.g., geological factors and poor understanding of the Titan atmosphere), but I have no idea what they could be besides some guesses. That, however, is completely beside the point. You were asked to prove your point that
Arbitran, on 13 April 2012 - 01:13 AM, said:
1Ophelia, on 12 April 2012 - 11:46 AM, said:
I'm asking for everyone's opinion wether or not you believe any other life source exsists beyound planet earths atmosphere?
Absolutely yes. Every place where life can take root, it will evolve and adapt to that environment. Not all life results in intelligent life; and not all intelligent life results in space-faring races. But even so, there are millions of space-faring races; far more intelligent species; and billions upon countless billions of worlds where the seeds of life have sprouted.
and you replied
Arbitran, on 14 April 2012 - 02:57 AM, said:
These turned out not to be the absolute evidence of life that you claim existed, which has now been pointed out numerous times by several posters here. But just to emphasize, here is another snippet from one of the references you provided:
Quote
"If these signs do turn out to be a sign of life, it would be doubly exciting because it would represent a second form of life independent from water-based life on Earth."Professor John Zarnecki, of the Open University, added: "We believe the chemistry is there for life to form. It just needs heat and warmth to kick-start the process.
"In four billion years' time, when the Sun swells into a red giant, it could be paradise on Titan."
So clearly this is just evidence that life could exist, not that it actually does. As stated before. But more importantly:
Quote
They warned, however, that there could be other explanations for the findings.
But taken together, they two indicate two important conditions necessary for methane-based life to exist.
Please take the time and read the bolded part. Slowly and carefully. And please ask questions if there is something you do not understand in that part, I am sure many are more than willing to help you understand it. As stated above, I have no idea what other explanations there could be, so I am just guessing. However, the scientists themselves states this so it is not upon my shoulders to come up with explanations for you because you do not read or cannot understand what is actually written. You claimed an absolute, we asked for evidence and you did not provide. The burden of proof is upon you given your claims. Not upon me, as I (as have others) have thoroughly torn your evidence apart and shown that it is not evidence of what you purported it to be (nor did the scientists writing said articles).Now, you can retract and acknowledge that you were wrong with respect to the statement of evidence, that actually commands respect. You can still hold your own, personal opinion and nobody would fault you for that. Or you can continue down the path you have trodden so far, but that is not going to earn you any credibility, rather the opposite. Your choice.
Cheers,
Badeskov
Edited for layout.
Edited by badeskov, 15 April 2012 - 09:20 PM.
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention to arrive safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming: Wow!! What a ride!". Said to to Dean Karnazes by a running buddy.