10148 replies to this topic

[zoser]

zoser, on 09 December 2012 - 05:02 PM, said:

How and why was this constructed at this angle?  Incredible.  Further more how can such a construction like the following actually be planned?



We chiefly use cuboid blocks in construction to avoid planning and unique shaping.  Yet it presented little problem for these builders. How?  How was it all planned?  How were the blocks offered together to get an initial match?  Did they cut one block then use a mould to get a mirror image then create a match?

The complexity of it all is stunning.

[Colonel Rhuairidh]

yay, the twit with the stupid hair makes an appearance again.

[zoser]

747400, on 09 December 2012 - 05:15 PM, said:

yay, the twit with the stupid hair makes an appearance again.

Then try explaining the above for a start.

[JGirl]

zoser, on 09 December 2012 - 04:35 PM, said:

Sure; the reasons are:

In South America (Peru) the precision of the megalithic sites at Cuzco, Sacsayhuaman, Ollantaytambo.  How was the precision fit achieved over such massive blocks?

In Bolivia the inexplicable carvings at Puma Punku.  A demonstration of precision stonework totally unparalleled. How was parallelism achieved on these blocks.  How were the inlaid precision corners and holes achieved in such incredibly hard stone?

In Egypt, how was precision achieved all throughout the GP's construction (the descending passage is accurate to 0.25 inch)?  The alignment to the cardinal points, and at precisely 30 deg N.  How were the KC and QC 'ventilaltion' shafts constructed?  How could it all have been achieved without detailed plans?  And yet language spoken and written were supposed to be only in a very primitive form.  Why is there an uncanny match with the dimensions of the pyramid to mathematical constants such as pi and phi?  Where did that come from?

Why is folklore persistent in these cultures regarding advanced visitors?  Races that have supposedly never been in contact with each other separated by oceans.

It certainly keeps the mind busy.

these aren't reasons, they're questions.

[zoser]

JGirl, on 09 December 2012 - 05:18 PM, said:

these aren't reasons, they're questions.

Nice little quotation for you:

"How were such titanic blocks of stone brought to the top of the mountain from the quarries many miles away? How were they cut and fitted? How were they raised and put in place? Now one knows, no one can even guess. There are archaeologists, scientists, who would have us believe that the dense, hard andesite rock was cut, surfaced and faced by means of stone or bronze tools. Such an explanation is so utterly preposterous that it is not even worthy of serious consideration. No one ever has found anywhere any stone tool or implement that would cut or chip the andesite, and no bronze ever made will make any impression upon it."

A. Hyatt & Ruth Verrill ----America's Ancient Civilizations

[zoser]

Looks like quite a few people have serious questions about orthodox archaeology!

[JGirl]

zoser, on 09 December 2012 - 05:21 PM, said:

Nice little quotation for you:

"How were such titanic blocks of stone brought to the top of the mountain from the quarries many miles away? How were they cut and fitted? How were they raised and put in place? Now one knows, no one can even guess. There are archaeologists, scientists, who would have us believe that the dense, hard andesite rock was cut, surfaced and faced by means of stone or bronze tools. Such an explanation is so utterly preposterous that it is not even worthy of serious consideration. No one ever has found anywhere any stone tool or implement that would cut or chip the andesite, and no bronze ever made will make any impression upon it."

A. Hyatt & Ruth Verrill ----America's Ancient Civilizations

i suggest you apply the parts of that quote i bolded to your own theory.

[zoser]

JGirl, on 09 December 2012 - 05:28 PM, said:

i suggest you apply the parts of that quote i bolded to your own theory.

I'm more than happy with that.  Not knowing is far better than grafting in some fairy tale about granite pounders, bronze axes and bow drills in shear desperation.

[bmk1245]

zoser, on 09 December 2012 - 05:33 PM, said:

I'm more than happy with that.  Not knowing is far better than grafting in some fairy tale about granite pounders, bronze axes and bow drills in shear desperation.

It WAS done by researchers (real ones, not those ignorant fools from AA),
You are demonstrating outstanding sheer ignorance on the daily basis.

Edited by bmk1245, 09 December 2012 - 05:50 PM.

[zoser]

Here's the other part of Brien's video on the remote megalithic site:

I believe that this was not created by the Inca:

[JGirl]

zoser, on 09 December 2012 - 05:33 PM, said:

I'm more than happy with that.  Not knowing is far better than grafting in some fairy tale about granite pounders, bronze axes and bow drills in shear desperation.

lol
but your theory of alien intervention is so logical, based on...oh wait, you aren't basing it on anything, that's right...

[zoser]

JGirl, on 09 December 2012 - 06:06 PM, said:

lol
but your theory of alien intervention is so logical, based on...oh wait, you aren't basing it on anything, that's right...

[JGirl]

zoser, on 09 December 2012 - 06:34 PM, said:

and?

[zoser]

JGirl, on 09 December 2012 - 06:37 PM, said:

and?

How was it done with stone age methods?

[badeskov]

zoser, on 09 December 2012 - 06:45 PM, said:

How was it done with stone age methods?

Time, man power and simple tools.

Cheers,
Badeskov