Stephen Treehorn: Quite a combination you might think, but having read the writings of both it does seem they expound almost identical knowledge. Almost. Perhaps the most well known 'fact' about David Icke is his belief that the Queen, amongst others, is a great big lizard. What he actually states is that through genetic manipulation there is a bloodline network which pretty much controls the world. This bloodline, sometimes referred to as the blue blood, has a strong reptilian genetic element which allows for the human subjects to be 'possessed' by a reptilian race. Through this possession the rest of humanity is subjected to perpetual war, banking scams, famine etc etc.
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please - Mark Twain
Posted 28 June 2013 - 04:46 AM
Rlyeh, on 27 June 2013 - 05:50 AM, said:
Do people get paid for writing this crap?
The ultimate tribute to the internet, sigh....
PS: I do not hope they get paid, but fear that I am wrong...
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention to arrive safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming: Wow!! What a ride!". Said to to Dean Karnazes by a running buddy.
I'm very skeptical about every word that comes out of his mouth, not only because of his ridiculous theories but also because he has been proven to be a blatant liar time and again. I seriously doubt he has had any sort of spiritual experiences ever.
The Nagas are mythological creatures, likewise David Icke's reptiles or Anunnaki. They both make for great fiction reading, but to take them seriously is the height of credulity.
If I had less scruples, I could come up with an equally new mythological conspiracy theory and bilk millions out of their hard earned money too. It seems the way to to go these days. Watch out Graham Hancock. here I come !
"It is wrong, everywhere and for every one, to believe anything on insufficient evidence". - W. K. Clifford