Professor Buzzkill, on 29 November 2012 - 12:37 AM, said:
If it was legal in my country to use a gun for self defense (if you have displayed any interest in self defense you cannot own a gun) i wouldn't be firing warning shots. Either you have identified that the intruder is not an immediate threat, and hence you shouldn't shoot, or you haven't identified that the target isn't a immediate threat, hence you take no chances and you shoot at the intruder.
All this is acedemic for me, as my gun is locked in the attic and is only accessable with a ladder, so it's not very likely i can get to the gun, even if my life depended on it, but the law is the law.
bolding mine
You say you wouldn't fire warning shots. That for you, there are only two options. Identify the situation as a non threat and don't shoot or take no chances and shoot.
Not a threat would be like when your son locks himself out and comes in through a window at 3am. (I'm glad I wouldn't shoot him with my warning shot)
Otherwise, a non lethal threat would entail letting
a perp get close to me or all the way inside my home and wait until he makes his intentions known. I don't like this option, I plan on avoiding with warnings (vocal and gun if necessary), defense, escape route, dogs, etc.
Too many innocent people get accidentally shot by people who know them.
So I prefer more than two options.
Edited by QuiteContrary, 29 November 2012 - 01:23 AM.