I'm gunna take a wild guess that if I go visit that website, not one of the many links it may contain is to any sort of real analysis. Am I right, Ciriuslea? Feel free to embarrass me by contradicting that... And if you can't, what would you infer from that strange omission?
I'd be delighted to address any real evidence. I'd be delighted to look at any circle designs that are claimed to be 'too difficult' for humans.. But that offer/request seems to have been ignored in favour of more handwaving and complaints about alleged insults. Which seems like a very convenient way of avoiding the request that claimants actually support their claims. How about supplying evidence and analysis instead of trying to avoid those topics?
You seem to have got carried away with trying to debunk all claims that you don't agree with, we can all provide links to sites saying all kinds of stuff, you have a link to a site that claims all circles are done by hoaxers, I found one that says they can determined those that have different characteristics to those known to be hoaxed, I don't know who makes them, you seem to so then I guess that's the end of the issue.
Whats with all the sarcasm and stuff do you have somekind of online ego to stroke or are you showing off to merton?,
I have no intention of embarrassing anyone funny you should say something like that after jumping all over my initial comment and by the manner of your replies.