78 replies to this topic

[aztek]

questionmark, on 31 January 2013 - 08:30 PM, said:

You got your New York City Permit in 96 and cannot tell us what you had to bring with you to apply? Short memory?

us???? don't speak for others, no one but you cares, , and even you don't care either, you asking to many question for the sake of asking not geting an answer.you also said guns in nyc were forbiden before 1998, and i got my permit in 96, so that proves you are full of hog wash.  pretty much what i've been saying all along.

[AsteroidX]

Now where kinda talkin the same language Q. I agree fully we got to clean the establishment up. Probably would make sense to do that first. Then lets see where we are with the gun debate. With a properly running moral government the need for guns would not be what it is today.

But yeah Im sure those scary areas would still exist.

[aztek]

AsteroidX, on 31 January 2013 - 08:43 PM, said:

But yeah Im sure those scary areas would still exist.

in 70s and 80s brighton\manhatten beach were rotten gettos, now it is russian area with $1-10mil. houses. getto inhabitants moved out.same was in 90's in atlantic city, it is clean now.in both cases it were not laws, or direct action of politicians that fixed it.in one case it was jewish \russian comunity, in others casinos, that made it happen.

[questionmark]

aztek, on 31 January 2013 - 08:41 PM, said:

us???? don't speak for others, no one but you cares, , and even you don't care either, you asking to many question for the sake of asking not geting an answer.you also said guns in nyc were forbiden before 1998, and i got my permit in 96, so that proves you are full of hog wash.  pretty much what i've been saying all along.

So, what documents did you have to bring?

If you can't tell me that I will have to suppose that you don't know what you are talking about. And us is because this is not a private conversation you are having with me. I am sure that a few more people are interested in this (especially those who really would like to see me not knowing what I am talking about once in their life).

[aztek]

questionmark, on 31 January 2013 - 08:50 PM, said:

So, what documents did you have to bring?

If you can't tell me that I will have to suppose that you don't know what you are talking about. And us is because this is not a private conversation you are having with me. I am sure that a few more people are interested in this (especially those who really would like to see me not knowing what I am talking about once in their life).

for the ppl interested i provided up to date link, for you personally, you isn't worth the effort,  think what you want, what do i care what arrogant liar thinks of me?

Yes I have proved you are one on many ocasions

Edited by aztek, 31 January 2013 - 08:59 PM.

[rashore]

I know the corruption in Chicago is horrible, probably one of the worst cities if not the worst in the nation. And I know hoods can change- Boystown is a good example of that.
But some of those hoods... I'm not sure any amount of corruption cleanup would help. I don't think there's enough good money that can move in to clean it up enough. And the bad hoods creep steadily into not so bad ones- increasing tags, increasing gunshots..
When I first moved into Andersonville, it was a really nice hood- by the time I moved out you could tell by the alleyways that the gangs had been using them as travelines. Just walking the few blocks to either the brown or red line could be a dangerous experience.

[questionmark]

aztek, on 31 January 2013 - 08:56 PM, said:

for the ppl interested i provided up to date link, for you personally, you isn't worth the effort,  think what you want, what do i care what arrogant liar thinks of me?

Yes I have proved you are one on many ocasions

I am not asking about now, I am asking about before '98, or before the licensing procedures were changed, that is not in the link.

And calling others names does not befit those who cannot answer simple questions that anybody who ever got a New York City gun license should be able to answer.

[AsteroidX]

Quote

I am not asking about now, I am asking about before '98, or before the licensing procedures were changed, that is not in the link.

And calling others names does not befit those who cannot answer simple questions that anybody who ever got a New York City gun license should be able to answer.

Thats so long ago its irrelevant. As you like to say in reference to the Constitution and Declaration of Independence. If it wasnt you that said those statements multiple times Q I apologize ahead of time. But to me thats hypocrisy.

[questionmark]

AsteroidX, on 31 January 2013 - 09:07 PM, said:

Thats so long ago its irrelevant. As you like to say in reference to the Constitution and Declaration of Independence. If it wasnt you that said those statements multiple times Q I apologize ahead of time. But to me thats hypocrisy.

It is not irrelevant if the guy calling you a liar evidently does not know the first thing about the theme and all he can come up with is a link to the New York City Firearms Dept.

[aztek]

questionmark, on 31 January 2013 - 09:04 PM, said:

I am not asking about now, I am asking about before '98, or before the licensing procedures were changed, that is not in the link.

And calling others names does not befit those who cannot answer simple questions that anybody who ever got a New York City gun license should be able to answer.

i'm not calling you names, i'm calling you what you are. there is a big difference.what makes you think lisencing procedures have changed??

[questionmark]

aztek, on 31 January 2013 - 09:09 PM, said:

i'm not calling you names, i'm calling you what you are. there is a big difference.what makes you think lisencing procedures have changed??

So still no answer? It may be in doubt for all who read this what I am, but surely they have an opinion about you by now.

[aztek]

questionmark, on 31 January 2013 - 09:09 PM, said:

It is not irrelevant if the guy calling you a liar

you are a liar, and i have proved it many times.

questionmark, on 31 January 2013 - 09:10 PM, said:

So still no answer? It may be in doubt for all who read this what I am, but surely they have an opinion about you by now.

lol, than say it, and prove it while you there, cuz i proved who you are.

[questionmark]

aztek, on 31 January 2013 - 09:10 PM, said:

you are a liar, and i have proved it many times.

Please continue.

[aztek]

questionmark, on 31 January 2013 - 09:10 PM, said:

So still no answer? It may be in doubt for all who read this what I am, but surely they have an opinion about you by now.

there is answer, in a form of question, just like you do.what makes you think procedure changed? have you gone thru it personaly??

[aztek]

questionmark, on 31 January 2013 - 09:11 PM, said:

Please continue.

i will , buddy, eveytime you spew a lie, and i see it. i will prove you are a liar. you can count on it.

but only if i have nothing better to do, cuz you know, you are on low priority list

Edited by aztek, 31 January 2013 - 09:14 PM.