Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please - Mark Twain
Posted 23 May 2013 - 03:00 AM
psyche101, on 22 May 2013 - 06:53 AM, said:
They would be more suited to producing more novels that come in handy when toilet paper is at a minimum.
Psyche, old mate, that made me think of Evangium...
Evangium, on 20 August 2009 - 02:10 PM, said:
2. If Mr 'Badeskov' is incessantly ranting, I must be satan himself to you then, since I'm publically on the record as stating that Mr. Bragalia's "research" into Roswell has about has about the same literary value as toilet paper. And since it's obviously in 'Witness to Roswell' redux... I'm sure you can figure it out for yourself.
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention to arrive safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming: Wow!! What a ride!". Said to to Dean Karnazes by a running buddy.
We really need to have some factual evidence and High quality Video`s and Film of ,Say a Ten Mile across Mother in Low Atmosphere like 5,000 feet MSL without a peep,noise, AKA District 9 movie. Then we might quiver in our boots a bit?
UFO's are simply undentified flying objects..that's the criteria. However, they are often military craft [California] and they can be border patrol in the sky in places such as Arizona, Texas and New Mexico. Most UFO aren't associated with any alien sightings. That's something different entirely.
But I did have something to add, and it was not a cheque.
Can you answer my question earlier and explain why none of those UFO`s were spotted while entering our Earths atmosphere? (pictures of meteorites will not be accepted).
Actually I recall reading several cases where a person described a streak across the sky and then a craft approach. Allagash may be one of the cases. Also if you are dealing with an advanced race it's rather arrogant to assume they can't enter earths atmosphere undetected.
Edited by topsecretresearch, 23 May 2013 - 04:51 AM.
The terms atomic battery, nuclear battery, tritium battery and radioisotope generator are used to describe a device which uses energy from the decay of a radioactive isotope to generate electricity. Like nuclear reactors they generate electricity from atomic energy, but differ in that they do not use a chain reaction. Compared to other batteries they are very costly, but have extremely long life and high energy density, and so they are mainly used as power sources for equipment that must operate unattended for long periods of time, such as spacecraft, pacemakers, underwater systems and automated scientific stations in remote parts of the world.
Do the ET craft also use Plasma Motors? Plasma (the glowing effect) is observed in UFO sightings.
I tried to enter my favorite quote but the data limit was breached so you get this. Pretty anti-climatic isn't it?
Posted 23 May 2013 - 06:09 AM
You might be on to something here, but if E.T. tech is 1000+ years ahead of us I speculate that they may have surpassed the lowly nuclear powered vehicle. I think they may harness dark energy drives or internal gravity wells to propel their ships.
I suspect that from the way they're reported to behave, it would suggest that they'd be able to manipulate gravity in some way. What power source they'd use for that is of course open to speculation, but I wonder perhaps if it might be some form of fusion reactor. Of course, they might not need an internal power supply at all (for propulsion at anmy rate), and maybe they can 'sail' upon gravity like how we can sail ships using only thje wind.
Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.