Big Bad Voodoo Posted September 6, 2013 #1 Share Posted September 6, 2013 "If a warhead, by design or by chance, were to hit the Miniature Neutron Source Reactor (MNSR) near Damascus, the consequences could be catastrophic," Aleksandr Lukashevich said in a Wednesday statement. http://rt.com/news/syria-strike-nuclear-disaster-427/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsec Posted September 7, 2013 #2 Share Posted September 7, 2013 Oh yeah, that's all we needed! Let's hope there won't be any attack in the first place 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted September 7, 2013 #3 Share Posted September 7, 2013 That's a really scary thought.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donnie Darko Posted September 7, 2013 #4 Share Posted September 7, 2013 It's very scary and well, I think The Bible mentions something about Damascus being destroyed. I hope it doesn't happen, but nobody wants to play nice. Too bad we've got a lot of crazies in power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted September 8, 2013 #5 Share Posted September 8, 2013 It's very scary and well, I think The Bible mentions something about Damascus being destroyed. I hope it doesn't happen, but nobody wants to play nice. Too bad we've got a lot of crazies in power. Isaiah 17 - also called "the burden of damascus" Damascus is to be utterly left in a ruinous heap -OVERNIGHT - and will be left uninhabitable by humans. Of course it hasn't happened yet but if there ever was a time that seemed likely - this is it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pallidin Posted September 8, 2013 #6 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I seriously doubt that there would be an intentional, or even "accidental", strike on that facility. Too far removed from the strike targets in question, that's for sure. And no reason anyway. I see it as Russian propaganda to scare people. Even still, this whole dang thing is a mess. Likely a strike will cause a VERY wide-spread regional war, eventually turning into international involvement, AKA WW3. I don't know, I just hate this whole damn thing. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acidhead Posted September 8, 2013 #7 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Russia created Israel. Everything were hearing is BS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acidhead Posted September 8, 2013 #8 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Isaiah 17 - also called "the burden of damascus" Damascus is to be utterly left in a ruinous heap -OVERNIGHT - and will be left uninhabitable by humans. Of course it hasn't happened yet but if there ever was a time that seemed likely - this is it. You lil war mongorer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bad Voodoo Posted September 8, 2013 Author #9 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Russia created Israel. Everything were hearing is BS. How come? Big Bad Voodoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acidhead Posted September 8, 2013 #10 Share Posted September 8, 2013 How come? Big Bad Voodoo Who won ww2... whatvwas the result of ww2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bad Voodoo Posted September 8, 2013 Author #11 Share Posted September 8, 2013 (edited) Who won ww2... whatvwas the result of ww2? UK, USA, China, Russia, France, Brazil... Big Bad Voodoo Edited September 8, 2013 by Big Bad Voodoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acidhead Posted September 8, 2013 #12 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Two thibgs happened.. the UN was formed and Israel was created. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bad Voodoo Posted September 8, 2013 Author #13 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Two thibgs happened.. the UN was formed and Israel was created. Yes but to claim that Russia created Israel I thought you have some evidence that specificly Russia created it. To me is obscure. Because during 6 day war and onwards we know Russia supported Egypt and Syria. Big Bad Voodoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted September 8, 2013 #14 Share Posted September 8, 2013 You lil war mongorer To reject something without investigating it is the very definition of laziness or bias. Even if Damascus was destroyed by a nuke next week, you (and to be fair -MOST) would STILL refuse to acknowledge the prophetic aspect of it. But that refusal doesn't make God's word any less real OR inaccurate. If that makes me a war monger then I accept the title. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gromdor Posted September 9, 2013 #15 Share Posted September 9, 2013 It's not prophetic if you go out of your way to make it happen. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted September 9, 2013 #16 Share Posted September 9, 2013 It's not prophetic if you go out of your way to make it happen. That's an interesting point but why exactly does it invalidate it? Are there rules of what constitutes prophetic fulfilment or is this just your opinion? And if this IS the case then why hasn't it happened before now? Up til now mankind has had to take it on faith. If it actually happens then I think it would be foolish and a bit insincere to reject it for such a reason - just my 2p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yamato Posted September 9, 2013 #17 Share Posted September 9, 2013 That's an interesting point but why exactly does it invalidate it? Are there rules of what constitutes prophetic fulfilment or is this just your opinion? And if this IS the case then why hasn't it happened before now? Up til now mankind has had to take it on faith. If it actually happens then I think it would be foolish and a bit insincere to reject it for such a reason - just my 2p The rules of prophetic fulfillment consist of one rule - it's complete and total BS. When you start playing politics with it, and you always do, it becomes a multi-layered BS mixed with politics and religion that has no foundation in reality. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yamato Posted September 9, 2013 #18 Share Posted September 9, 2013 I seriously doubt that there would be an intentional, or even "accidental", strike on that facility. Too far removed from the strike targets in question, that's for sure. And no reason anyway. I see it as Russian propaganda to scare people. Even still, this whole dang thing is a mess. Likely a strike will cause a VERY wide-spread regional war, eventually turning into international involvement, AKA WW3. I don't know, I just hate this whole damn thing. Too far from what strike targets "for sure"? What do you know? Nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spartan max2 Posted September 9, 2013 #19 Share Posted September 9, 2013 Personally if I wanted to make sure my **** didnt get bombed by the U.S then I would move it to somewhere that they Wouldent bomb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted September 9, 2013 #20 Share Posted September 9, 2013 The rules of prophetic fulfillment consist of one rule - it's complete and total BS. When you start playing politics with it, and you always do, it becomes a multi-layered BS mixed with politics and religion that has no foundation in reality. So the fact that Yam doesn't believe in prophecy is the last word on the subject, eh? What arrogance you display. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asadora Posted September 9, 2013 #21 Share Posted September 9, 2013 This too shall pass. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spud the mackem Posted September 9, 2013 #22 Share Posted September 9, 2013 The POST heading says "Russia warns of Nuclear disaster etc", ok so why do people start bringing religeon and prophesies into the thread ?, The U.S. wont use Nukes if they do go ahead and hit Syria,the Ruskies wont use them either,so who are we debating is going to use Nukes ? From the pictures I've seen Damascus is allready a heap of rubble,due to Assads rag-tag army and guerillas running around blasting everything.The horrible thing is that Syrians are killing Syrians and should get around a PEACE table and sort things out in a civilised manner.At the moment both sides are losers,and its the wives and kids who are suffering. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted September 9, 2013 #23 Share Posted September 9, 2013 (edited) I`m not one for prophesies of the Bible to be true, but if there are Jesus`s could be , since he appeared to see the future. When you see this abomination of desolation standing in a holy place run into the hills of Judea,or no flesh shall be saved. Could it be if the US hits Syria, Iran would hit Isreal.What about the redline on Iran`s nukes? Edited September 9, 2013 by docyabut2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asadora Posted September 9, 2013 #24 Share Posted September 9, 2013 I`m not one for prophesies of the Bible to be true, but if there are Jesus`s could be , since he appeared to see the future. When you see this abomination of desolation standing in a holy place run into the hills of Judea,or no flesh shall be saved. Could it be if the US hits Syria, Iran would hit Isreal.What about the redline on Iran`s nukes? I think that 'redline' regarding Iran's nukes has faded to pink. I don't think anyone is gonna touch that one anytime soon. ( Normally I would put a disclaimer here stating that this is my opinion; however, it seems even that isn't safe from ridicule this days.) Kind Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.United_Nations Posted September 9, 2013 #25 Share Posted September 9, 2013 The POST heading says "Russia warns of Nuclear disaster etc", ok so why do people start bringing religeon and prophesies into the thread ?, The U.S. wont use Nukes if they do go ahead and hit Syria,the Ruskies wont use them either,so who are we debating is going to use Nukes ? From the pictures I've seen Damascus is allready a heap of rubble,due to Assads rag-tag army and guerillas running around blasting everything.The horrible thing is that Syrians are killing Syrians and should get around a PEACE table and sort things out in a civilised manner.At the moment both sides are losers,and its the wives and kids who are suffering. No the thread is about a nuclear facility near Damascus 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now