tapirmusic Posted January 18, 2013 #1 Share Posted January 18, 2013 (edited) "After trotting out young children as the backdrop for his gun control rollout yesterday, the White House released videos today of young children reading anti-gun letters to the camera. “No guns, no guns, no guns, no guns!” pleads one little girl, Hinnah. “My opinion is it should be very hard for people to buy guns,” says little Julia. “It’s a free country, but I recommend there needs to be a limit with guns,” says little Grant. “I thought I would write to you to stop gun violence,” reads little Taejah. It was already despicable for Obama to exploit children as a backdrop for his political posturing, implying that his opposition on useless gun control laws somehow cares less about children. Now he’s taken the next step, trotting children out as spokespeople for his agenda." [media=] http://www.breitbart...ore-gun-control Edited January 18, 2013 by tapirmusic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tapirmusic Posted January 18, 2013 Author #2 Share Posted January 18, 2013 (edited) Edited January 18, 2013 by tapirmusic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted January 18, 2013 #3 Share Posted January 18, 2013 yeah, this is getting creepy, and unsettlingly into Stalinist/Hitlerean propaganda territory. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Order66 Posted January 18, 2013 #4 Share Posted January 18, 2013 It stands to reason that if you oppose Obama, then you must oppose childrens. The two are linked in my mind, like a trained dog that salivates when he hears the bell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsteroidX Posted January 18, 2013 #5 Share Posted January 18, 2013 It stands to reason that if you oppose Obama, then you must oppose childrens. The two are linked in my mind, like a trained dog that salivates when he hears the bell. We use the term sheeple to describe that mentality. Think for yourself and do your homework instead of blindly following the Agenda to destroy the Constitution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David-C Posted January 18, 2013 #6 Share Posted January 18, 2013 We use the term sheeple to describe that mentality. Think for yourself and do your homework instead of blindly following the Agenda to destroy the Constitution. I, for one, am NOT a sheeple. When the Obamabots come to take away my guns I wish them good luck. I will, however, be more than happy to share the few thousand rounds of ammo I have with them. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cradle of Fish Posted January 18, 2013 #7 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I, for one, am NOT a sheeple. When the Obamabots come to take away my guns I wish them good luck. I will, however, be more than happy to share the few thousand rounds of ammo I have with them. Dude with that mentality you're going to be killed. No maybe about it. Not to mention you're willing to kill other Americans who are just doing their jobs. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasina Posted January 18, 2013 #8 Share Posted January 18, 2013 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+HerNibs Posted January 18, 2013 #9 Share Posted January 18, 2013 (edited) Of course the "other side" would never stoop to using kids as an emotional trigger to get what they want... https://www.youtube....h?v=zKLA3BODXr0 Nibs Edited January 18, 2013 by HerNibs 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corp Posted January 18, 2013 #10 Share Posted January 18, 2013 (edited) I, for one, am NOT a sheeple. When the Obamabots come to take away my guns I wish them good luck. I will, however, be more than happy to share the few thousand rounds of ammo I have with them. Don't worry tough guy they're not coming for your guns, despite how often the lie gets dragged out. Edited January 18, 2013 by Corp 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohio traveler Posted January 18, 2013 #11 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I, for one, am NOT a sheeple. When the Obamabots come to take away my guns I wish them good luck. I will, however, be more than happy to share the few thousand rounds of ammo I have with them. Becareful dude. Remember Waco. Our government won't think twice about fire bombing your house and killing every man, woman, and child on your property. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grey14 Posted January 18, 2013 #12 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Yeah that is pretty low and an obvious ploy on emotions. I do think there should be some more gun regulations. Such as background checks for all gun purchases. However If someone wants to own an AR-15 with a 100 round drum (a little overboard i will say) then they should be able to do so. A gun is a tool, sure it is meant to shoot things but it is still a tool. The person wielding the tool is resposible for what it does. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
questionmark Posted January 18, 2013 #13 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Yeah that is pretty low and an obvious ploy on emotions. I do think there should be some more gun regulations. Such as background checks for all gun purchases. However If someone wants to own an AR-15 with a 100 round drum (a little overboard i will say) then they should be able to do so. A gun is a tool, sure it is meant to shoot things but it is still a tool. The person wielding the tool is resposible for what it does. and responsible for the tool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cradle of Fish Posted January 18, 2013 #14 Share Posted January 18, 2013 A gun isn't a tool, it is a weapon. They always have been and always will be. The debate can't go anywhere if you deny such a basic and crucial fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
questionmark Posted January 18, 2013 #15 Share Posted January 18, 2013 A gun isn't a tool, it is a weapon. They always have been and always will be. The debate can't go anywhere if you deny such a basic and crucial fact. A weapon is also a tool, ask any subsistence hunter., 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafterman Posted January 18, 2013 #16 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Of course the "other side" would never stoop to using kids as an emotional trigger to get what they want... https://www.youtube....h?v=zKLA3BODXr0 Nibs Pity that you can't see the difference between the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yamato Posted January 18, 2013 #17 Share Posted January 18, 2013 "No guns! No guns! No guns! No guns! No guns!" Obama: "Now that's a pretty smart letter from a pretty smart young person." "I think there should be a limit to how many guns people can own." Obama: " Well there's a pretty smart kid right there. If we limit the number of guns people can own to say....five, we can prevent the next Newtown." "Please don't let people have machine guns." Obama: "Why didn't I think of that? I'll put this idea on my website, since machine guns are legal right now." "I beg you to make guns not allowed for the whole United States." Obama: "That's right Julia. I'll do just that while I remain the greatest arms proliferator in the world because those kids don't need to worry about guns, just you." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+HerNibs Posted January 18, 2013 #18 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Pity that you can't see the difference between the two. Not sure what you mean? Both are using kids as an emotional trigger. Regarding the NRA ad, yeah, I think my kids are just as important as the Presidents but in all reality, if mine are kidnapped or shot we aren't going to war over it. Besides, President Obama isn't trying to take anyone's guns or outlaw a person carrying them/owning them for protection. Nibs 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohio traveler Posted January 18, 2013 #19 Share Posted January 18, 2013 If anything, it's very unfair to the kids. Kids that age are easily influenced and don't realize that what they are doing now will be with them for the rest of their lives. They're being used as pawns and have no idea of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+HerNibs Posted January 18, 2013 #20 Share Posted January 18, 2013 If anything, it's very unfair to the kids. Kids that age are easily influenced and don't realize that what they are doing now will be with them for the rest of their lives. They're being used as pawns and have no idea of that. I agree. Both sides are using emotional blackmail. Nibs 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supervike Posted January 18, 2013 #21 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Yeah that is pretty low and an obvious ploy on emotions. I do think there should be some more gun regulations. Such as background checks for all gun purchases. However If someone wants to own an AR-15 with a 100 round drum (a little overboard i will say) then they should be able to do so. A gun is a tool, sure it is meant to shoot things but it is still a tool. The person wielding the tool is resposible for what it does. I agree with what you are saying. But, if a gun is just a tool, why can't I own (legally) a completely automatic m-16, with armor piercing rounds. What about one of those cool gatling guns that fire 1000's rounds per second? I guess my question is where does our Right to bear arms stop? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bavarian Raven Posted January 18, 2013 #22 Share Posted January 18, 2013 A weapon is also a tool, ask any subsistence hunter. every weapon is a tool, and any tool can be used as a weapon. it depends on the person using it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beckys_Mom Posted January 18, 2013 #23 Share Posted January 18, 2013 (edited) I agree. Both sides are using emotional blackmail. Nibs Nah never.. Only Obama and his party would ever do that..lol I would like to know where exactly does it state that Obama has in fact confirmed that every last gun owner will have their guns taken from them?? I am asking because someone on the first page of this thread mentioned about how he will stop them from taking his guns away.. I thought why say that?? Was there actual news to say guns will go ? Edited January 18, 2013 by Beckys_Mom 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+HerNibs Posted January 18, 2013 #24 Share Posted January 18, 2013 (edited) Nah never.. Only Obama and his party would ever do that..lol I would like to know where exactly does it state that Obama has in fact confirmed that every last gun owner will have their guns taken from them?? I am asking because someone on the first page of this thread mentioned about how he will stop them from taking his guns away.. I thought why say that?? Was there actual news to say guns will go ? Nope. No such order or law has been passed. Nibs ETA - All that has been done are some proposed ideas and some executive actions that clarify current laws. Here I think they are pretty common sense. Edited January 18, 2013 by HerNibs 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohio traveler Posted January 18, 2013 #25 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I agree with what you are saying. But, if a gun is just a tool, why can't I own (legally) a completely automatic m-16, with armor piercing rounds. What about one of those cool gatling guns that fire 1000's rounds per second? I guess my question is where does our Right to bear arms stop? I think a fair argument would be that we should have the right to arm ourselves on par with local law enforcement. We ( I ) face the same threats as they do from thugs, gangs, criminals, or basically anyone wishing to do us harm. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now