Paxus, on 30 January 2011 - 02:49 PM, said:
Like you, I feel this is just far too big a subject to start posting about... all over again.. this is why I hoped you could giev me a few that were satisfactorily debunked...
Well, a few of these that you've listed have been satisfactorily explained. I wouldn't use the word debunk, because much of this so called evidence is open to a wide variety of interpretations.
Paxus, on 30 January 2011 - 02:49 PM, said:
Off the top of my head:
* Ancient incl. cave paintings haven't changed - i know they're open to interpretation but they are but a piece of a puzzle.
There aren't any cave paintings I've seen that can be definitively interpreted to represent alien visitation. But AA hypothesizers certainly do love the ambiguity that our ancestors left behind in scratched or painted circles and whatnot.
Paxus, on 30 January 2011 - 02:49 PM, said:
* The map (forget name of it) that could not have been made without access to flight (i think it was 5000ft, which on top of it's accuracy showed land mass under ice before sonar/radar(again, i forget which you use to scan land mass under ice) was invented.
You are talking about the Piri Reis map I would assume? It doesn't show Antarctica, despite the many people who claim it does. There are numerous references here on UM about this. For
example.
Paxus, on 30 January 2011 - 02:49 PM, said:
* Giant drawings are for ?
What giant drawings are you referring to?
Paxus, on 30 January 2011 - 02:49 PM, said:
* Giza and other things like an upside down pyramid or massive rocks over massive areas that were simply melted into desires steps etc were simply not made like that by us! I'm sorry but they weren't
People say all sorts of things but none of them really gel. I even read people here on UM saying, oh but they could melt rock... I doubt it but even if ancient man could, they certainly couldn't do it to rock faces over big areas (talking like 10 meter steps etc)....
Some ancient structures are certainly intriguing, but not outside the capability of man to build. I wouldn't say that the ancients could melt stone, but just because it looks like it was melted does not mean that it was melted.
Paxus, on 30 January 2011 - 02:49 PM, said:
There is FAR too much to write out here that simply does not add up - for example people hardly ever even mention that it's odd that dislocated people all come up with pyramid design all over the world (Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, the Far East, and in North and South America), or sheet of Mica in the upper tiers and 400 meters down the avenue of the Pyramid - what the?!!? (Mica is no good for building but it is good for shielding electromagnetic radiation or radio waves - not to mention the Mica was traced to South America... How did they get these large sheets to Egypt?)
Pyramid type structures around the world actually bear very little resemblance to each other. I haven't heard about this mica bit before, perhaps you can elaborate on that bit?
Paxus, on 30 January 2011 - 02:49 PM, said:
* Writings of the the Bible, the Koran, the Mahabharata... (again, i'm not saying they're not just stories, but that this is just another piece of a puuzzle)
I think we'd have to get pretty specific about particular texts to even begin discussing this part.
Paxus, on 30 January 2011 - 02:49 PM, said:
* Ancient races ridiculously accurate knowlede of all sorts of astronomy - how? why?
They looked at the sky. All the time. Why wouldn't they be familiar with the movements of celestial bodies? It isn't as though they had a lot of distractions after the sun went down like we do.
Paxus, on 30 January 2011 - 02:49 PM, said:
No worries mate. There are many disjointed puzzle pieces that AA hypothesizers have attempted to pull together. This generates an illusion of substance where there really is none.
4
