- zero evidence that Vignola had to repeat the comments from Timmerman.
- zero evidence that Vignola or Timmerman are lying.
- refused to address a pertinent question regarding your claim.
- chosen to be wilfully ignorant to the very basic concept of interjection in an account.
You must understand that you need to give me reason to fall in line with your claim otherwise obviously it’s not going to happen. You have been given the opportunity to support what you believe with evidence and logic but instead have shut down with stubborn repetition of your base claim as your only defence. This is very telling and shows that your argument is poor; you cannot uphold your claim in honest discussion.
Quite honestly, I’d be running and hiding in your position too.