Attached Files
-
Ghost Hand.jpg 223.92K
89 downloads
1
1 votes
ghost hand
Started by
alanvat
, Nov 21 2012 03:17 PM
8 replies to this topic
#1
alanvat
-
- Member
-
- 10 posts
Alien Embryo
- Joined:22 Sep 2007
- Gender:Female
- Location:south wales
Posted 21 November 2012 - 03:17 PM
A few years ago a friend of mine had to have his house exorcised,according to him they had seen lots of ghosts and had lots of strange things happening,well things went quiet for a while but recently they started back up again,my daughter stayed there a few weeks ago and like all teenage girls was taking photos on her phone and she caught this,let me know what you think
#2
Kasey2601
-
- Member
-
- 3,549 posts
Voted Most Likely to Steal Ketchup from the Office
- Joined:17 Jan 2008
- Gender:Not Selected
-
Dishonest and stupid. Feel free to ignore everything I say.
Posted 21 November 2012 - 03:23 PM
Looks like a double exposure of some kind. Cell phone cameras aren't exactly the best. I mean more than half the device is dedicated to other tasks.
Illegal immigration isn't a new concept in the US. Just ask the Native Americans.
"...it is the fault of our science that it wants to explain all; and if it explain not, then it says there is nothing to explain."
"...it is the fault of our science that it wants to explain all; and if it explain not, then it says there is nothing to explain."
#3
DancingCorpse
-
- Member
-
- 615 posts
Remote Viewer
- Joined:16 Jul 2011
- Gender:Male
- Location:Castle Discordia
-
Finite to fail, infinite to venture!
Posted 21 November 2012 - 04:54 PM
Could be double exposure, could be manipulated photo, sometimes mobile phone cameras can blur and catch things in different places, could be a curious spirit! There's pretty much no way to figure it out now technology allows us to play around with images etc. The activity in the house might be related, children are full of energy and can provoke and intrigue active ghosts. Interesting shot either way 
Edited by DancingCorpse, 21 November 2012 - 04:55 PM.
Overhead the albatross hangs motionless upon the air,
And deep beneath the rolling waves, in labyrinths of coral caves,
The echo of a distant tide comes willowing across the sand,
And everything is green and submarine...
And deep beneath the rolling waves, in labyrinths of coral caves,
The echo of a distant tide comes willowing across the sand,
And everything is green and submarine...
#4
scowl
-
- Member
-
- 1,905 posts
Photographic Phraud
- Joined:17 Nov 2010
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portland, OR
Posted 21 November 2012 - 04:57 PM
Here's how to reproduce this. It's a classic...
The flash is set for fill flash. That means that what we see in the photo is a combination of the light of the flash and the ambient light. Note that in this photo the light from the flash and the ambient light are just about even. This is not a powerful flash at all. To compensate for the weak flash, the shutter speed is slow to gather as much ambient light as possible.
Someone put a hand on the girl's shoulder when the flash went off then quickly pulled their hand back right after it went off. The girl stood still for the rest of the exposure which allowed the dim ambient light from her shoulder (where the hand was) to fill in that area. They removed their hand quickly enough so that, after the flash, there's no trace of this motion.
[Looking closer, there does appear to be a blurriness to the hand that indicates motion.]
The flash is set for fill flash. That means that what we see in the photo is a combination of the light of the flash and the ambient light. Note that in this photo the light from the flash and the ambient light are just about even. This is not a powerful flash at all. To compensate for the weak flash, the shutter speed is slow to gather as much ambient light as possible.
Someone put a hand on the girl's shoulder when the flash went off then quickly pulled their hand back right after it went off. The girl stood still for the rest of the exposure which allowed the dim ambient light from her shoulder (where the hand was) to fill in that area. They removed their hand quickly enough so that, after the flash, there's no trace of this motion.
[Looking closer, there does appear to be a blurriness to the hand that indicates motion.]
Edited by scowl, 21 November 2012 - 05:01 PM.
#5
JGirl
-
- Member
-
- 4,707 posts
Pajama Goddess
- Joined:23 Sep 2010
- Gender:Female
- Location:British Columbia Canada
-
hell, yeah
Posted 21 November 2012 - 05:03 PM
i think the girl in the background is scarier
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it and ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.
Winston Churchill
#6
scowl
-
- Member
-
- 1,905 posts
Photographic Phraud
- Joined:17 Nov 2010
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portland, OR
Posted 21 November 2012 - 05:05 PM
JGirl, on 21 November 2012 - 05:03 PM, said:
i think the girl in the background is scarier
It the poster had said that no one saw the girl in the background and they don't know who she is, then that's a house I wouldn't sleep in!
#7
ouija ouija
-
- Closed
-
- 6,080 posts
Majestic 12 Operative
- Joined:20 Oct 2011
Posted 21 November 2012 - 06:50 PM
What is the curved white line in the top quarter of the photo?
#8
scowl
-
- Member
-
- 1,905 posts
Photographic Phraud
- Joined:17 Nov 2010
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portland, OR
Posted 21 November 2012 - 07:45 PM
The photo looks like they were taking a picture of themselves in a mirror. Not only does the mirror have a curved cut at the bottom, it looks like two mirrors with curved cuts hung together (very artistic). The white curve is the small gap of wallpaper between the two mirrors. You can see the fancy wallpaper at the bottom of the photo.
That would also explain why the flash was so weak. It was being bounced off of the mirror(s) and the wallpaper.
That would also explain why the flash was so weak. It was being bounced off of the mirror(s) and the wallpaper.
#9
Archimedes
-
- Member
-
- 1,336 posts
Saint of Killers
- Joined:11 Jun 2011
- Gender:Not Selected
- Location:Somewhere where I don't know where I am
Posted 21 November 2012 - 08:10 PM
scowl, on 21 November 2012 - 04:57 PM, said:
Here's how to reproduce this. It's a classic...
The flash is set for fill flash. That means that what we see in the photo is a combination of the light of the flash and the ambient light. Note that in this photo the light from the flash and the ambient light are just about even. This is not a powerful flash at all. To compensate for the weak flash, the shutter speed is slow to gather as much ambient light as possible.
Someone put a hand on the girl's shoulder when the flash went off then quickly pulled their hand back right after it went off. The girl stood still for the rest of the exposure which allowed the dim ambient light from her shoulder (where the hand was) to fill in that area. They removed their hand quickly enough so that, after the flash, there's no trace of this motion.
[Looking closer, there does appear to be a blurriness to the hand that indicates motion.]
The flash is set for fill flash. That means that what we see in the photo is a combination of the light of the flash and the ambient light. Note that in this photo the light from the flash and the ambient light are just about even. This is not a powerful flash at all. To compensate for the weak flash, the shutter speed is slow to gather as much ambient light as possible.
Someone put a hand on the girl's shoulder when the flash went off then quickly pulled their hand back right after it went off. The girl stood still for the rest of the exposure which allowed the dim ambient light from her shoulder (where the hand was) to fill in that area. They removed their hand quickly enough so that, after the flash, there's no trace of this motion.
[Looking closer, there does appear to be a blurriness to the hand that indicates motion.]
More useful knowledge for future use. Thanks scowl.
Edited by Archimedes, 21 November 2012 - 08:13 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
