10148 replies to this topic

[topsecretresearch]

[Slave2Fate]

topsecretresearch, what exactly is the correlation between the different ideas that you have presented? Where is the evidence, or at least logic that takes you from point 'A' to point 'B'? Flooding the thread with pics isn't getting your point across I'm afraid.

[topsecretresearch]

[topsecretresearch]

Slave2Fate, on 26 January 2013 - 10:13 AM, said:

topsecretresearch, what exactly is the correlation between the different ideas that you have presented? Where is the evidence, or at least logic that takes you from point 'A' to point 'B'? Flooding the thread with pics isn't getting your point across I'm afraid.

There may be a correlation between the aliens described today and what ancients considered God. The Egyptian solar disc and a flying saucer. Harthor who represented fertility and alien abduction and cattle mutilation where alien-human hybrids are described.

[TheOtherSide1945]

I stopped believing in Reptilian Shapeshifting Cockroach Jews when Jesse Ventura blew them up.

[Sir Wearer of Hats]

and here was me thinking that the Egyptians dipicted the sun as a disk because they worked their art in a stylised two-dimensiions.

[seeder]

topsecretresearch, on 26 January 2013 - 09:40 AM, said:

Cloning Red Herrings By David Longtin and Duane C. Kraemer.

hehe, great name for a book!!   I shall sharpen my pencil and be back later for that one

[seeder]

topsecretresearch, on 26 January 2013 - 10:18 AM, said:

There may be a correlation between the aliens described today and what ancients considered God. The Egyptian solar disc and a flying saucer. Harthor who represented fertility and alien abduction and cattle mutilation where alien-human hybrids are described.

I'll tell you what, you presented a bunch of pics but which is the one(s) that you feel connects ancient aliens to them?  Or are ancient aliens? You do know we have some surgical-striking skeptics on this thread dont you?

Edited by seeder, 26 January 2013 - 01:26 PM.

[seeder]

TheOtherSide1945, on 26 January 2013 - 11:06 AM, said:

I stopped believing in Reptilian Shapeshifting Cockroach Jews when Jesse Ventura blew them up.

Now he's the MAN!  But he needs to do something with that pony tail - its so soppy for an ex seal

I dont why but your choice of words made me laugh

Edited by seeder, 26 January 2013 - 01:22 PM.

[DingoLingo]

zoser.. please come back.. at least you come across a little more intelligent then TSR..

[Babe Ruth]

Lord Vetinari, on 24 January 2013 - 03:27 PM, said:

Ley lines could not, perhaps, be a modern name (and interpretation) for something that's been there all along? So you assume that it's all a load of mumbo Jumbo because a source online (i.e. Wikky Pedia) suits the conclusion that you have already arrived at, and refers to a couple of boooks that agree with that preconception? That doesn't seem very open minded. See, that's the trouble with this forum; if anyone even mentions anything outside of what mainstream convention agrees on, then instantly it's rubbished (complete with quotes from Wookie Pedia) as a load of mumbo Jumbo.
Anyway, did I say it was my theory? Just that is what the theory basically seems to say, and however much people may wish to rubbish it I still think it's interesting.

You are so right about Wikky Pedia and orthodox 'science'.  Wikky can certainly be useful, but its accuracy is highly suspect in my book.  Orthodox science is more about patting each other on the back than finding answers and explanations.

[seeder]

Babe Ruth, on 26 January 2013 - 02:17 PM, said:

You are so right about Wikky Pedia and orthodox 'science'.  Wikky can certainly be useful, but its accuracy is highly suspect in my book.  Orthodox science is more about patting each other on the back than finding answers and explanations.

wasnt it Myles who stated 20 universities check the accuracy of Wiki?

[seeder]

Myles, on 24 January 2013 - 04:22 PM, said:

You must understand that Seeder did present some facts.   To rebut, you must do the same.

I see you like to bash Wikipedia.   Although there are accuracy issues here and there, it is correct nearly all of the time.  After looking into it, I found that there are 20 universities that do nothing but check new enteries for accuracy.

[Oniomancer]

Wearer of Hats, on 26 January 2013 - 11:48 AM, said:

and here was me thinking that the Egyptians dipicted the sun as a disk because they worked their art in a stylised two-dimensiions.

And here I though it was because that's how it actually looks from earth.

[Colonel Rhuairidh]

seeder, on 26 January 2013 - 02:30 PM, said:

wasnt it Myles who stated 20 universities check the accuracy of Wiki?

perhaps if they didn't have this, to be honest, gimmick that it's The Encyclopaedia that Anyone can Edit, and they allowed people to contribute articles but had them checked & edited to a uniform style (which is another Bug bear of Wikipedia) before putting them up, they wouldn't need to have a crack team of no fewer than 20 Universities checking them, when I'm sure they could be doing something else with their time.