1528 replies to this topic

[zoser]

Chrlzs, on 03 November 2012 - 04:39 AM, said:

Thanks, Synch.  I apologise for initially not clarifying that my question was more directed at Zoser, who seemed to be claiming to have a new-found ability to enlarge the bejeebers out of images...

Thing is, these enlargements are indeed pretty much worthless.  Apart from the fact that they clearly *have* used an interpolation technique, which adds in pixels on a rough-guess basis, the image is almost certainly already compromised by the aforementioned issues like compression and sharpening/contrast enhancements, let alone being over- or digital-zoomed, out-of-focus and motion blurred...

Such enlargements are, 'forensically', worse than useless.  But (oft times) they can be great for folks who want to find 'detail' they can somehow add to their tantalisation..  And of course if the 'researcher' can then add on a bit of post processing, like additional sharpening, posterising, edge filtration ad infinitum, they can adjust the sliders to get pretty much anything they want...

Tell me if you agree with the findings.

[zoser]

zoser, on 03 November 2012 - 07:48 AM, said:

The video clip is on page 54.  Is this what you need?  Never mind I'll post it again:

The snapshot that I enlarged was at 30 seconds +/- 0.5

[zoser]

This is the object that appears towards the end of the clip in the top left and is descending.  Could this be a similar phenomena or is it something else?

[zoser]

Has anyone come across this object?  Is it one of ours?  Is it a hoax?






See 3:18 in the following clip:

[bee]

.

hey zoser....great to see you having some fun with images.....nice zoom in of the what-ever-it-is in the above post....

[zoser]

bee, on 03 November 2012 - 09:06 AM, said:

.

hey zoser....great to see you having some fun with images.....nice zoom in of the what-ever-it-is in the above post....

Yes; can't help thinking that that the last one is a hoax otherwise it would have been more widely publicised surely?

[bee]

zoser, on 03 November 2012 - 09:20 AM, said:

Yes; can't help thinking that that the last one is a hoax otherwise it would have been more widely publicised surely?

I don't know....there is so much on the internet (at the moment).... most of it will stay on the internet.

And won't get into the mainstream media.

the hoax possibility always has to be considered....that's the paranoia that has been created by the hoaxers (many who will be intelligence

service employees, IMO)....trying to muddy the waters and bury the good stuff.

.


edit...to be honest...it doesn't look like a hoax to me.

one of ours? one of theirs?.....

nice pic...cheers for that..

.

Edited by bee, 03 November 2012 - 10:00 AM.

[Hazzard]

zoser, on 03 November 2012 - 09:00 AM, said:

Has anyone come across this object?  Is it one of ours?  Is it a hoax?

Now THAT is the way this should be done. By falcification. Weeding out the mundane and the nonsense to see what is left.

[zoser]

Hazzard, on 03 November 2012 - 02:21 PM, said:

Now THAT is the way this should be done. By falcification. Weeding out the mundane and the nonsense to see what is left.

We are still left with a mystery though.  I can't find anything that says this is a hoax.  It isnt' ours either.  I'm beginning to think that the best evidence really is in these space clips.

[JimOberg]

I'm starting to think we should just declare this thread an adults-free zone and move on.

[booNyzarC]

zoser, on 03 November 2012 - 02:35 PM, said:

We are still left with a mystery though.  I can't find anything that says this is a hoax.  It isnt' ours either.  I'm beginning to think that the best evidence really is in these space clips.

Best evidence for what exactly zoser?  Are you shifting away from your previous thoughts:

zoser, on 02 November 2012 - 09:38 PM, said:

I reckon that the larger objects on the clip are storm related phenomena.  Don't ask me any more than that because I just don't know,  A meteorologist would be useful at this point.

and:

zoser, on 02 November 2012 - 05:18 PM, said:

Not at all; I personally don't think it's an ET craft for one minute.  It has to be something though.

I was quite encouraged to see you post these things.  I'm hopeful that your latest turn isn't a sign of one step forward, two steps back.

[zoser]

JimOberg, on 03 November 2012 - 02:47 PM, said:

I'm starting to think we should just declare this thread an adults-free zone and move on.

Just when it was starting to get interesting!  

It's not about one side against the other; not for me anyway.  There is just too much evidence for the ET hypothesis; no amount of clever argument or clever science can alter that fact.

On the other hand it does look like the mystery of the large disks may have been solved and we have a more 'prosaic' explanation.

[zoser]

booNyzarC, on 03 November 2012 - 02:50 PM, said:

I was quite encouraged to see you post these things.  I'm hopeful that your latest turn isn't a sign of one step forward, two steps back.

I'm convinced that the some of the spherical phenomena may be related to electrical weather effects.  That still doesn't account for the dozens of photographs that remain unexplained from the various space missions.  The video clip in post 889 has some awesome footage.  

I think that ice and camera aberrations are not valid explanations either I'm afraid.

[TheMacGuffin]

JimOberg, on 03 November 2012 - 02:47 PM, said:

I'm starting to think we should just declare this thread an adults-free zone and move on.

You first.

[booNyzarC]

zoser, on 03 November 2012 - 09:00 AM, said:

Has anyone come across this object?  Is it one of ours?  Is it a hoax?






See 3:18 in the following clip:

Zoser...

The anomaly in the upper right corner is simply a reflection of the tip of the space station.  If you brighten the original just a little bit, you can see the panel which extends toward the upper right at an angle.

Edit:

Here, this might help:

Edited by booNyzarC, 03 November 2012 - 06:35 PM.