Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 7 votes

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10148 replies to this topic

#4861    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 30,759 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005

Posted 14 January 2013 - 10:33 AM

View PostMyles, on 14 January 2013 - 01:36 AM, said:

I need to post this one more time because I've seen where a few new folks have joined the thread.

Zoser, you have completely failed at every debate you've had in this thread.

Indeed that is completely the case, not to mention the norm, however, it would not be a loss if there was some connection to other worlds. There is not. There is only disbelief that man could be precise. Such a connection is completely non-existent, the only connection is attributing what escapes one to a higher power, just as the ancient greeks did with thunder and lightning.

No matter how much one refuses to believe that man did the quite possible, the evidence for ET is no more compelling, nor existent than there if for a race of top hat wearing super intelligent amphibians that only lived on earth for one thousand years at the height of their reign, and were rendered not only extinct, but deleted from history entirely due to their cartilaginous skeletons and superb taste when cooked in butter and herbs.

ET just is not there, no matter how much we squint. At best, he is merely conjured up by the faithful. Kinda sounds familiar doesn't it.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo 'If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.' - Sir Isaac Newton. "Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit." Ed Stewart. Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs. Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Sir Wearer of Hats.


#4862    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 9,265 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012

Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:02 PM

View PostWearer of Hats, on 13 January 2013 - 10:51 PM, said:

And, just to keep things fresh ... they weren't Stone Age peoples either.
Given they worked gold etc with a great degree of talent, I'd say they'd be bronze age at least, the fact copper mining was a fine art in that region of the world supports that (in fact, according to Phil Coppens (RIP) Spanish and Modern miners look upon finding evidence of mine workings by previous cultures as a boon, it means there's copper in the mine they themselves are attempting to work).

Agreed, but even I heard something new in looking into this madcap posting, they have actually decided, (archeo's/scientists etc) that there is/was a Copper Age, before the Bronze age, (do a google)

And way back when zoser was getting butterflies about this 'discovery' of PP, he himself wrote about them using copper clamps between stones, IIRC, he just couldn't decide if they were poured in hot, or beaten cold..

Then he uses the word stone age ever since. (???) Perhaps he needs reminding, because things were built of stones...DOES NOT mean it was the stone age!  True stone age people did not live much of a settled existence, instead following herds of animals on their migrations, and mostly, lived in caves, or made very crude camps and shelters.  Plus the killer is - the stone age was at least 2 million years ago. Maybe 2.5 million in fact. PLUS various cultures left the stone age at different times.

Now he also says PP may be older than experts suggest, OK fair enough. it was mentioned on the AA series after all.  But the copper age is KNOWN very well... and funny enough, the copper age (or parts of its duration), ties in very well with the suggested age of PP, meaning its only as old as we already knew. Of course you cant date the actual rocks tho, but if there was copper there...

well it wasn't the stone age.

Weird that isnt it, what a coincidence!!

Edited by seeder, 14 January 2013 - 05:24 PM.

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

#4863    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,094 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:23 PM

The stone age wasn't a period millions of years ago, but started millions of years ago and lasted up to , say, 4500 years ago.

Btw, about dating Puma Punku: many people give it an extreme age, like 12 or even 17,000 years because of Posnansky's reconstruction of nearby Tiwanaku :

http://www.unexplain...60#entry3236248

Posnansky based his dating of Tiwanaku on his archeo-astronomical interpretation of the complete ruined area he encountered.

And many have serious doubts if the reconstruction based on his ideas are even correct.


#4864    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 9,265 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012

Posted 14 January 2013 - 05:39 PM

View PostAbramelin, on 14 January 2013 - 05:23 PM, said:

The stone age wasn't a period millions of years ago, but started millions of years ago and lasted up to , say, 4500 years ago.


Ok I can appreciate it wasnt totally clear, I had imagined my sentence of  "PLUS various cultures left the stone age at different times" may have indicated what you said..

But thanks for pointing it out anyway! I will be more precise with words next time!  :tu:

Edited by seeder, 14 January 2013 - 05:40 PM.

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

#4865    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 14 January 2013 - 06:51 PM

My ears are burning again :unsure2:

Good to see you all.  

Just plodding on through the Foerster video's and AA documentaries.  No doubt you guys have already watched them all, so I thought I'd better acquaint myself with all the information.

Some cracking stuff there I must say.

Good that the issues have attracted some lively debate, and I don't mean that sarcastically.  

So I'm just pausing a little and looking at different angles of the AA phenomena.

I'll perhaps check in later to see what's happening.

Good to see you back seeder.

It looks like as soon as there is news on the DNA postiing it will be posted here; a good book mark for anyone interested:

http://www.dnaforpat...ng-to-find-out/

Edited by zoser, 14 January 2013 - 06:52 PM.

Posted Image


#4866    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 9,265 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012

Posted 14 January 2013 - 07:01 PM

View Postzoser, on 14 January 2013 - 06:51 PM, said:

My ears are burning again :unsure2:

Good to see you all.  

Just plodding on through the Foerster video's and AA documentaries.  No doubt you guys have already watched them all, so I thought I'd better acquaint myself with all the information.

Some cracking stuff there I must say.

Good that the issues have attracted some lively debate, and I don't mean that sarcastically.  

So I'm just pausing a little and looking at different angles of the AA phenomena.

I'll perhaps check in later to see what's happening.

Good to see you back seeder.

It looks like as soon as there is news on the DNA postiing it will be posted here; a good book mark for anyone interested:

http://www.dnaforpat...ng-to-find-out/

oh boy, hello zoser - sunshine... did you bother to read the comments under the vid? clearly not as you done it again..

So you didnt read anything once again! As is to be expected really. Coz this is what it says

Comments
ouncy says:
January 3, 2013 at 11:44 pm

I agree, this looks appalling. They lose all credibility? when these are the standards in which they work in. I dont think they know what constructive criticism means either.
Reply
CuddlinTurk says:
January 4, 2013 at 12:12 am

hahaha thank you for? that reply, made my day!
Reply
mrdanherbert says:
January 4, 2013 at 12:31 am

why dont you just go **** yourself??
Reply
CuddlinTurk says:
January 4, 2013 at 12:47 am

Yes very professional! Why dont they leave it to people who actually know what they’re doing.?
Reply
HomeWatchViewer says:
January 4, 2013 at 1:16 am

Where did the Cutting Blade go,? is it burried within the skull now ?
Reply
Brien Foerster says:
January 4, 2013 at 1:16 am

No, we either have to wait, or get another? lab.
Reply
miki4630201 says:
January 4, 2013 at 1:45 am

any results? yet?
Reply
Brien Foerster says:
January 4, 2013 at 2:01 am

Happy New? Year to you!
Reply
007hor says:
January 4, 2013 at 2:10 am

@brienfoerster, keep up the good work guys. And Happy New? Year.
Reply
Brien Foerster says:
January 4, 2013 at 2:38 am

Preliminary results which are intriguing; seems to be as complex as Lloyd Pye’s Star Child; Lloyd is in charge of our DNA? testing. (starchlid was diseased human, fact)
Reply
A Smith says:
January 4, 2013 at 3:02 am

any results??
Reply
Brien Foerster says:
January 4, 2013 at 3:24 am

No yet, no; another? month maybe.
Reply
hibobslay says:
January 4, 2013 at 3:34 am

Have you? heard anything back?
Reply
Brien Foerster says:
January 4, 2013 at 4:01 am

Everyone is of course interested in proof; however, I have gone farther than most researchers on the subject. Results will hopefully be available in about a month; some of the evidence will be shown here, the rest in the book I am writing? with David Hatcher Childress.
Reply
mrsdiggs718 says:
January 4, 2013 at 4:04 am

When should the results be back? I’m interested in proof, instead of just conjecture.?

Edited by seeder, 14 January 2013 - 07:10 PM.

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

#4867    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 14 January 2013 - 07:08 PM

Hi seeder;

Yeh I saw that lot; just a load of narrow minded skeptics.  Just ignore them I would.

Posted Image


#4868    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 9,265 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012

Posted 14 January 2013 - 07:17 PM

View Postzoser, on 14 January 2013 - 07:08 PM, said:

Hi seeder;

Yeh I saw that lot; just a load of narrow minded skeptics.  Just ignore them I would.

Amen!

Is this evidence of zoser becoming wiser?
Or evidence of his just compounding his own theories in order to sustain his own beliefs??

Just ignore..

just ignore what? science? Archeology? facts?

Edited by seeder, 14 January 2013 - 07:21 PM.

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

#4869    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 14 January 2013 - 07:28 PM

View Postseeder, on 14 January 2013 - 07:17 PM, said:

Amen!

Is this evidence of zoser becoming wiser?
Or evidence of his just compounding his own theories in order to sustain his own beliefs??

Just ignore..

just ignore what? science? Archeology? facts?

Just ignore the skeptics I meant.

Posted Image


#4870    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 14 January 2013 - 07:36 PM

An intriguing carving in the bedrock, in a seemingly isolate place.  Looks like it has suffered some earthquake damage.  Interesting to speculate what it could have been; just a quarry perhaps or something more:



Posted Image


#4871    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 9,265 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012

Posted 14 January 2013 - 07:40 PM

View Postzoser, on 14 January 2013 - 07:36 PM, said:

An intriguing carving in the bedrock, in a seemingly isolate place.  Looks like it has suffered some earthquake damage.  Interesting to speculate what it could have been; just a quarry perhaps or something more:


there goes the swerve again..

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

#4872    Valdemar the Great

Valdemar the Great

    Unsafe at Any Speed

  • Member
  • 24,140 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005

Posted 14 January 2013 - 07:48 PM

View Postseeder, on 13 January 2013 - 10:02 PM, said:

:w00t: :w00t: :w00t:

Final check on the thread,
over and out for good.


:innocent:  See, people just can't stay away ....

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


Posted Image


#4873    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 14 January 2013 - 07:52 PM

Here's another example; if this was just a quarry point then why finish the top edge that perfectly?  Just quarrying out a complete block (or blocks) would not have left the edge that straight by mundane means.

If it was just the blocks they wanted why not just leave it in a rough state?

Unless it was extracted by high tech that naturally left it like that.  Far more likely.  There are hundreds of these examples littering the Cuzco area.



Posted Image


#4874    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 14 January 2013 - 07:53 PM

View PostLord Vetinari, on 14 January 2013 - 07:48 PM, said:

:innocent:  See, people just can't stay away ....

Yeh seeder's hooked.  Like the others.  No bad thing; else I'm in here all alone.  Seeder; it's your turn for the drinks.  Rack em up.

Posted Image


#4875    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 9,265 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012

Posted 14 January 2013 - 07:59 PM

View PostLord Vetinari, on 14 January 2013 - 07:48 PM, said:

:innocent:  See, people just can't stay away ....

want to bet on that? and you just contributed to the swerve didnt you

Its just I cant stand some donut will try sway highly gullible others.... that their ridiculously insane beliefs are based on fact.

If that's what Lord v thinks..good luck princess! you know that many others will give you a right royal rse kicking as time goes by..

Edited by seeder, 14 January 2013 - 08:03 PM.

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain