Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * - - - 5 votes

Shattering the Myths of Darwin's Theory


  • Please log in to reply
236 replies to this topic

#121    Imaginarynumber1

Imaginarynumber1

    I am not an irrational number

  • Member
  • 6,158 posts
  • Joined:22 Mar 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:46 AM

View Postthe L, on 27 September 2012 - 08:42 AM, said:

Im not. I said that US proffesors knew better then Italian since I mentioned Itlian proffesor which claim that we dont know who made first tool and that we dont have evidence of evolution for anatomicly modern human.

Sorry. My mistake.

"You do not teach the paths of the forest to an old gorilla."


"It's a little like wrestling a gorilla. You don't quit when you're tired - you quit when the gorilla is tired."


RAPTORS! http://www.unexplain...pic=233151&st=0


#122    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:48 AM

View PostArbitran, on 26 September 2012 - 04:44 AM, said:

We do have bones from in between. That's just when it gets to the point where you're not comprehending the concept of a continuum of organisms. We invented "species", for the purpose of simplifying the otherwise dizzying task of biological organization. Organisms come as individuals, and those individuals come in groups; breeding groups which stand alone, and are capable of breeding with each other, but not with other species, those we term "species". But as I've mentioned before, the definition is a bit plastic. For instance, separate species which are still sufficiently-closely-related can still interbreed, although with lesser success rates, and often infertile or sterile offspring (e.g., horse + donkey = mule; lion + tiger = liger/tigon; polar bear + brown bear = polar bear-brown bear hybrid). We have many of the intermediate fossils between H. heidelbergensis and Homo sapiens sapiens, but the distinction between the two becomes blurred after a point, and we often term these "archaic Homo sapiens". And no, a snail or a platypus cannot be said to be the ancestor of humans.

Didnt we agreed that Archaic homo sapiens or simply h.s. is H.heidelbergensis?

http://en.wikipedia....ic_Homo_sapiens

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#123    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:50 AM

View PostImaginarynumber1, on 26 September 2012 - 04:48 AM, said:

The numbers were just an example. An analogy. The numbers themselves have no meaning, I just made them up as a representation.
But they can apply to all speices. Imagine we find one bone. Say we give it  position X. We find more bones that are like us but more like X. We call it Y. We then find more bones that are less like Y but more like X, so we call it W. Looking at them all together we can see a progression from W to X to Y, etc.
Yes but as I understand we have only bones of Goliath and bones of human. Nothing in between.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#124    Arbitran

Arbitran

    Post-Singularitan Hyperturing Synthetic Intelligence

  • Member
  • 2,767 posts
  • Joined:13 Jan 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:52 AM

View Postthe L, on 27 September 2012 - 08:48 AM, said:

Didnt we agreed that Archaic homo sapiens or simply h.s. is H.heidelbergensis?

http://en.wikipedia....ic_Homo_sapiens

Not quite. Again, that's where the line becomes blurred.

View Postthe L, on 27 September 2012 - 08:50 AM, said:

Yes but as I understand we have only bones of Goliath and bones of human. Nothing in between.

Where the hell did talking about Goliath come from? I thought we were talking about Homo heidelbergensis!

Try to realize it's all within yourself / No-one else can make you change / And to see you're really only very small / And life flows on within you and without you. / We were talking about the love that's gone so cold and the people / Who gain the world and lose their soul / They don't know they can't see are you one of them? / When you've seen beyond yourself then you may find peace of mind / Is waiting there / And the time will come / when you see we're all one and life flows on within you and without you. ~ George Harrison

#125    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:54 AM

View PostArbitran, on 27 September 2012 - 08:52 AM, said:

Where the hell did talking about Goliath come from? I thought we were talking about Homo heidelbergensis!

I thought that Goliath is nick name for H.h.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#126    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 September 2012 - 08:57 AM

Posted Image

http://www.theage.co...1086008084.html


HOMO HEIDELBERGENSIS ~ NICKNAME: Goliath LIVED: 700,000 to 300,000 years ago HABITAT: Temperate and tropical, Africa and Europe DIET: Omnivorous - meat, vegetables, tubers, nuts

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#127    Arbitran

Arbitran

    Post-Singularitan Hyperturing Synthetic Intelligence

  • Member
  • 2,767 posts
  • Joined:13 Jan 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:00 AM

View Postthe L, on 27 September 2012 - 08:54 AM, said:

I thought that Goliath is nick name for H.h.

It might be. I haven't personally heard that nickname used. But then, I'm not an anthropology specialist, nor has it taken my particular interest. I know "Lucy", "Ida", and "Ardi" for hominin nicknames... I gather there are more, but I've never really picked them up. Either way...

Try to realize it's all within yourself / No-one else can make you change / And to see you're really only very small / And life flows on within you and without you. / We were talking about the love that's gone so cold and the people / Who gain the world and lose their soul / They don't know they can't see are you one of them? / When you've seen beyond yourself then you may find peace of mind / Is waiting there / And the time will come / when you see we're all one and life flows on within you and without you. ~ George Harrison

#128    Arbitran

Arbitran

    Post-Singularitan Hyperturing Synthetic Intelligence

  • Member
  • 2,767 posts
  • Joined:13 Jan 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:01 AM

View Postthe L, on 27 September 2012 - 08:57 AM, said:

Posted Image

http://www.theage.co...1086008084.html


HOMO HEIDELBERGENSIS ~ NICKNAME: Goliath LIVED: 700,000 to 300,000 years ago HABITAT: Temperate and tropical, Africa and Europe DIET: Omnivorous - meat, vegetables, tubers, nuts

Oh, so that's where you got it from... interesting... You might have based your statements off of something a bit more accurate...

Try to realize it's all within yourself / No-one else can make you change / And to see you're really only very small / And life flows on within you and without you. / We were talking about the love that's gone so cold and the people / Who gain the world and lose their soul / They don't know they can't see are you one of them? / When you've seen beyond yourself then you may find peace of mind / Is waiting there / And the time will come / when you see we're all one and life flows on within you and without you. ~ George Harrison

#129    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:06 AM

Okay then.

Yes but as I understand we have only bones of Homo heidelbergensis and bones of Homo sapiens sapiens. Nothing in between.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#130    Arbitran

Arbitran

    Post-Singularitan Hyperturing Synthetic Intelligence

  • Member
  • 2,767 posts
  • Joined:13 Jan 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:09 AM

View Postthe L, on 27 September 2012 - 09:06 AM, said:

Okay then.

Yes but as I understand we have only bones of Homo heidelbergensis and bones of Homo sapiens sapiens. Nothing in between.

Incorrect. Again, that is the point at which the distinction of "species" breaks down. The demarcation becomes blurred, and H. heidelbergensis and Homo sapiens were indistinguishable, at that point in time.

Try to realize it's all within yourself / No-one else can make you change / And to see you're really only very small / And life flows on within you and without you. / We were talking about the love that's gone so cold and the people / Who gain the world and lose their soul / They don't know they can't see are you one of them? / When you've seen beyond yourself then you may find peace of mind / Is waiting there / And the time will come / when you see we're all one and life flows on within you and without you. ~ George Harrison

#131    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 September 2012 - 09:15 AM

View PostArbitran, on 27 September 2012 - 09:09 AM, said:

Incorrect. Again, that is the point at which the distinction of "species" breaks down. The demarcation becomes blurred, and H. heidelbergensis and Homo sapiens were indistinguishable, at that point in time.

Can you show fossils in between those two. As Imaginary used number from 1 to 15, I understand that we have number 1 and 15 not 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14.
But I dont ask for fossils from 2 to 14. Only one from that numbers. Lets say between 5-10.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#132    Imaginarynumber1

Imaginarynumber1

    I am not an irrational number

  • Member
  • 6,158 posts
  • Joined:22 Mar 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 27 September 2012 - 10:51 AM

View Postthe L, on 27 September 2012 - 09:15 AM, said:

Can you show fossils in between those two. As Imaginary used number from 1 to 15, I understand that we have number 1 and 15 not 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14.
But I dont ask for fossils from 2 to 14. Only one from that numbers. Lets say between 5-10.

You misunderstand. I meant to show the progression of H.h into H.s. We have all those bones and more. But at some point we decided to call bones that are more like X than Y a different species.

"You do not teach the paths of the forest to an old gorilla."


"It's a little like wrestling a gorilla. You don't quit when you're tired - you quit when the gorilla is tired."


RAPTORS! http://www.unexplain...pic=233151&st=0


#133    Doug1o29

Doug1o29

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 6,901 posts
  • Joined:01 Aug 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:oklahoma

Posted 27 September 2012 - 12:44 PM

View Postthe L, on 27 September 2012 - 09:15 AM, said:

Can you show fossils in between those two. As Imaginary used number from 1 to 15, I understand that we have number 1 and 15 not 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14.
But I dont ask for fossils from 2 to 14. Only one from that numbers. Lets say between 5-10.
I don't know about these two human species, not being an evolutionary anthropologist, but:

I have recently become involved in a project to redescribe the bottom 50 feet of the Mississippian, between the Ordovician Unconformity and the Pierre shale at its type locality at Roaring River State Park in southwest Missouri.  It's a beautiful area with lots of semi-mountainous scenes and panoramas.  The site is a road cut a quarter-mile south of the hotel - close enough I can walk over to its high-class restaurant for lunch.  Tough job.

Anyway, the column encompasses about 20 million years of geologic time.  This was a time when the inland sea passage was drying out.  Salt concentrations were about 10% and calcium carbonate was precipitating out of solution, producing some very hard limestone, interbedded with shale.  There are 26 species of conodonts, a species of eel, that occur within the section.  Some occur very early and some occur much later.  You can look through the microscope and see the gradual changes in form and species numbers that occur from bottom to top.  That's evolution happening before your eyes.  Every intermediate form is represented.  We have the evidence of one species evolving into another into another into another.

That's hard evidence for evolution.
Doug

If I have seen farther than other men, it is because I stood on the shoulders of giants. --Bernard de Chartres
The beginning of knowledge is the realization that one doesn't and cannot know everything.
Science is the father of knowledge, but opinion breeds ignorance. --Hippocrates
Ignorance is not an opinion. --Adam Scott

#134    Mr. Miyagi

Mr. Miyagi

    "His Dudeness"

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,626 posts
  • Joined:26 May 2009
  • Gender:Male

  • "..."

Posted 27 September 2012 - 01:20 PM

Posted Image
I've been reading along with this thread and the one before hand. I try not to get involved in these threads anymore but I just wanted to suggest this image for L as it's been used in the past. L, view this spectrum the same way you'd view evolution... At what point does red become orange? This is what you're asking for in regards to evolution. There are millions of minute transitions between species to species or from color to color. Fosilization is a rare occurance. Refering back to the color spectrum, It's much easier to find yellow and green or blues in between the gradual change between red and violet than it is to find observable differences between the change from red to orange. It's not that these changes did not occur. They did. They must have unless a mechanism can be displayed that limits the amount of these tiny genetic changes. One has not. How many of these tiny changes can a "species" undergo before it becomes a noticibly different "species"? The change is inevitable but to ask for an example of a transitional species that "seals the deal" is akin to asking for an exact point in which red changes to orange.

I dunno if my example helps or not. i hope it did. Good luck.


#135    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 September 2012 - 01:47 PM

View PostImaginarynumber1, on 27 September 2012 - 10:51 AM, said:

You misunderstand. I meant to show the progression of H.h into H.s. We have all those bones and more. But at some point we decided to call bones that are more like X than Y a different species.

We have them? I never read in any article or book about them. Even wiki used term may be because if we had them that would be evidence black on white.
Can you give the link for that claim.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users