Vedic Cosmology and Extended Fibonacci

[Adrick]

The following is called The Extended Fibonacci Series of numbers. Inherent in the functioning of this table are the basis of the ancient calendars (and then some . This post will explain it's relation to the Hindu Vedic Cosmology.

My brother created the table and calls it John Adams' Extended Fibonacci Table (go to http://vortex369.blogspot.com for details about this table)

In this table, the 12th row is the important row. Look at the 12th row on the table above and see how it relates to Mahu Yuga. (The twelfth row is highlighted in blue).

mahu yuga : 4,320,000 human years (column 30 X 1,000)

Column 12 (1728) is the 1st age: 1,728,000 human years (column 12 X 1,000)

Column 9 (1296) is the 2nd age: 1,296,000 human years (column 9 X 1,000)

Column 6 (864) is the 3rd age: 864,000 human years (column 6 X 1,000)

Column 3 (432) is the 4th age: 432,000 human years (column 3 X 1,000)

A Mahu Yuga is these 4 ages added together:

So add the above 4 numbers:

12th Row, Column 3 + 6 + 9 + 12 = Column 30.

or 432 (R12C3) + 864 (R12C6) + 1296 (R12C9 + 1728 (R12C12) = 4320 (R12C30)

Notice the Columns associated with the Mahu Yuga are the magic numbers 3, 6, 9, and 12.

Also note that the numbers in the columns actually need to be multiplied by 1,000 to reflect the actual Vedic years. Well the table has a 10x's multiplier built in. In other words, if you multiply column 3 x 10, you get column 30. The 12th row in these columns reflect this multiplier, column 3 is 432. Column 30 is 4320, therefore, Column 300 would be 43,200, C3,000 = 432,000, and C30,000 = 4,320,000.

So for an accurate representation of the Mahu Yuga, we would have to go to Column 3000 for the 4th age (432,000 years), Column 6000 (864,000 years), Column 9000 (1,296,000 years), Column 12,000 (1,728,000 years) and finally Column 30,000 (4,320,000 years) for the total Mahu Yuga.

So, 4,320,000 Human Years = 1 Mahu Yuga

1000 Mahu Yugas (or 4,320,000,000 human years) = 1 day of Brahma

720 Kalpas or Days of Brahma (360 days + 360 Nights) (or 3,110,400,000,000 human years) = 1 Year of Brahma

100 Years of Brahma (or 311,040,000,000,000 human years) = 1 Lifetime of Brahma

We have some new numbers here, 720 Kalpas, and 3,110,400,000,000 human years.

720 appears on the 12th row at Column 5, and 3,110,400,000,000 appears on R12,C216 as 31,104.

To get 1 day of Brahma, you have to go to 1000 Mahu Yuga on the table. If 1 Mahu Yuga falls on the table at Column 30,000, 1 day of Brahma falls on Row 12 Column 30,000,000. 1 year of Brahma is 720 times 1 day of Brahma. If Column 30,000,000 is 1 day, multiply this by 720 = Column 21,600,000,000. For a Lifetime of Brahma, multiply Column 21,600,000,000 by 100 and you get Column 2,160,000,000,000. If all is right, we should be able to skip calculations and just go to the table and find R12 at Column 216. We know if we multiply column 216 by 10,000,000,000 we get our Column 2,160,000,000,000. So we need to multiply C216,R12 which is 31,104 by 10,000,000,000 and we get one brahma lifetime in human years, or 311,040,000,000,000 Human Years, and we are accurate.

Question, why is the year of Brahma represented as 720 days, (360 days and 360 nights) and the human year represented by 360 days opposed to 360 days and 360 nights? When calculating the human years in relation to Brahma Years, shouldn't we double our days to account for nights?

We have been looking at other things that relate to this table and it appears fairly comprehensive. Pythagoras' Music of the Spheres, Sumerian Counting, Pyramid Construction / Design, Egyptian Fractions based on 64, Mayan Long Count, Cycles of the Zodiac, Revelations of St. John, Platonic Solids, Sacred Geometry, Vortex Math, Cymatic Vibrations, etc. I understand that these fields are similar, but what is the principle that bounds them all together? Why are the ancient calendars similar? Why does the music scale harmonically resonate, with the planets and their characteristics? Could it be because the creator counts in sequence of wholes, the next number not in increments of 1 part, but by the whole of its predecessor? Counting in such a manner reflects the entire cosmos in each number. Our current numbering is an abstract system, numbers having no intrinsic value except as a numeric placeholder. This Extended Fibonacci Math captures the reflective and fractal nature of Creation. THE unifying function that explains the breathing of the Cosmos.

[toast]

What?

[theotherguy]

Welcome to the club, Adrick! This looks interesting, but could you please fill in some of the background information?

[Sir Wearer of Hats]

The joy or numbers is that they can be arranged in almost any way in order to get any result you want.

[Adrick]

I'm sorry it came across kinda vague... Basically a math function was built off the Fibonacci Sequence. When this function is run it builds the system of numbers seen in the table posted. When the numbers on the table were first viewed, we noticed a lot of familiar "esoteric" numbers falling in row 12. These numbers, after further research, were following patterns we see in the sciences, particular the esoteric and mystery sciences. This post is an explanation of how the table illustrates the mathematical function behind Vedic Cosmology. The number of years in this cosmology representing The Mahu Yuga fall into 4 categories or "worlds". The 4th and last world in the Mahu Tuga is a duration of 432,000 years. The 3rd world lasts 864,000 years. The 2nd world lasts 1,296,000 years. The 1st world lasts 1,728,000 years. We are currently through about half of the 4th and last world of the current cycle of Mahu Tuga. To follow Vedic or Hindu cosmology, there exists 1,000 cycles of Mahu Tuga in 1 day cycle of Brahma. Going deeper still, in a Brahma year, there are 360 Day Cycles and 360 Night Cycles of Brahma. Brahma's life exists for 100 years of Brahma before returning to the Absolute.

OK, all that being said, the table above is the output of a Fibonacci Sequence that defines this entire cycle of Brahma. So, in theory, when Brahma was being conceived, The Creator based the cycles of creation in their entirety off of the pattern found in Fibonacci Sequence. The "Word" the Creator uttered in the beginning of this lifetime of Brahma had, at its core, this sequence. This Fibonacci pattern, as explained here and elsewhere is as simple as starting with zero and adding to it one. After this, the sequence progresses by adding the "answer" to the previous "answer".

So the first column starts with 1 by adding 0 and 1...0 + 1=1 + 1=2 + 1=3 + 2=5 + 3=8 + 5=13 + 8=21 + 13 = 34, etc.

The second column starts with 2 by adding 0 and 2...0 + 2=2 + 4=6 + 4=10 + 6=16 + 10=26, etc.

The third column starts with 3 by adding 0 and 3...

fourth by 4

fifth by 5

etc.

These calculations are displayed in the table.

Hope this makes more sense now....

[Adrick]

Sir Wearer, yes, numbers are a tool that we can and do use to describe the natural world. I think the interesting thing about the significance of this number equation is its simplicity. We, as a society, create some FANTASTIC abstract math to try and relate our beliefs.

[jaylemurph]

Hmmm. I think I preferred Adric when he was hurtling towards the surface of the Earth in a freighter.

--Jaylemurph

[govatron]

Great post and questions Adrick! I've been to your blog and you (and your brother?) have done some amazing, open-minded research. Super fascinating and I've only begun to explore! I love how you put this question:

"Could it be because the creator counts in sequence of wholes, the next number not in increments of 1 part, but by the whole of its predecessor? Counting in such a manner reflects the entire cosmos in each number. Our current numbering is an abstract system, numbers having no intrinsic value except as a numeric placeholder. This Extended Fibonacci Math captures the reflective and fractal nature of Creation. THE unifying function that explains the breathing of the Cosmos."

There is a sanskrit verse which is the invocation of the Sri Isa Upanishad (or Isopanisad) and I'm wondering if you've come across it?

Iso Invocation — The Personality of Godhead is perfect and complete, and because He is completely perfect, all emanations from Him, such as this phenomenal world, are perfectly equipped as complete wholes. Whatever is produced of the Complete Whole is also complete in itself. Because He is the Complete Whole, even though so many complete units emanate from Him, He remains the complete balance.

Full Upanisad at: http://vedabase.com/en/iso

George Harrison produced an album in the sixties wherein my uncle sings this Sri Isopanishad. Here'a a youtube video with the song, starting with that invocation.

Edited November 2, 2014 by govatron

[Imaginarynumber1]

The joy or numbers is that they can be arranged in almost any way in order to get any result you want.

I often use that fact about numbers to freak people out with a deck of card.

[Adrick]

Great post and questions Adrick! I've been to your blog and you (and your brother?) have done some amazing, open-minded research. Super fascinating and I've only begun to explore! I love how you put this question:

There is a sanskrit verse which is the invocation of the Sri Isa Upanishad (or Isopanisad) and I'm wondering if you've come across it?

Iso Invocation — The Personality of Godhead is perfect and complete, and because He is completely perfect, all emanations from Him, such as this phenomenal world, are perfectly equipped as complete wholes. Whatever is produced of the Complete Whole is also complete in itself. Because He is the Complete Whole, even though so many complete units emanate from Him, He remains the complete balance.

Full Upanisad at: http://vedabase.com/en/iso

George Harrison produced an album in the sixties wherein my uncle sings this Sri Isopanishad. Here'a a youtube video with the song, starting with that invocation.

Been a long delay! I thought this topic was dead. Thank you for visiting Sickscent's blog. It is a difficult subject if you are not versed from the beginning. Someone mentioned how numbers can be bent to your whim. I agree with that but there is also fundamental laws in mathematics that cannot be broken. Math is a very direct representation of Reason. When Reason utilizes mathematics to assist in its theory, it adds to the Reasoning faculty. These theoretical concepts that Sickscent explains do not, in any way, violate the principles of math. It is hard enough to develop a bridge between philosophy and math. It is then extremely difficult to build a philosophical theory that does not violate these mathematical principles. IMO, Sickscent is not bending any rules to get to his conclusions, he is just exposing what is inherently there.

Thank you for your interest. Props to your Uncle! That is very cool! I hope you are staying in touch with the blog.

[Harte]

It's not surprising that sums of powers of 12 correspond to "significant" time periods in a timekeeping system based on the number 12.

Harte

[Emma_Acid]

I thought this topic was dead.

It was.

[Jarocal]

It's not surprising that sums of powers of 12 correspond to "significant" time periods in a timekeeping system based on the number 12.

Harte

You weren't completely shocked that two different things based on the number 12 can be shown to have certain commonalities?

I for one was prepared to call the dancing bears for an Appalachan hoedown to celebrate the discovery.

Then again, the mash is about a week old and I may searching too hard for a reason to break out some corn squeezins...

Edited May 16, 2015 by Jarocal

[Hanslune]

It was.

...yet zombie like it has arisen again to spread terror, discord and rancid mayonnaise everywhere. FLEE

[Harte]

...yet zombie like it has arisen again to spread terror, discord and rancid mayonnaise everywhere. FLEE

You FOOL!

Animal products are forbidden.

Hate

[Hanslune]

You FOOL!

Animal products are forbidden.

Hate

HAH this is olive oil based Mayonnaise!

[Harte]

HAH this is olive oil based Mayonnaise!

So?

Mayo is basically an emulsion of olive oil and egg yolk.

Recipe

Infidel.

Harte

[Hanslune]

So?

Recipe

Infidel.

Harte

http://food.ndtv.com/recipe-eggless-mayonnaise-262812

Rabbit eating Heretic