Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 7 votes

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10148 replies to this topic

#1531    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010

Posted 11 December 2012 - 01:59 PM

You must ask why SETI was included in research if is just pure enregy.

Edited by the L, 11 December 2012 - 02:06 PM.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#1532    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,061 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 11 December 2012 - 02:04 PM

View Postthe L, on 11 December 2012 - 01:59 PM, said:

You must ask why SETI was included in research if is just pure enregy. Im quite sure that all bigger goverment research it.

Were they really asked, or did the SETI people come on their own initiative?


#1533    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010

Posted 11 December 2012 - 02:11 PM

View PostAbramelin, on 11 December 2012 - 02:04 PM, said:

Were they really asked, or did the SETI people come on their own initiative?

Dont remember how SETI come into story but I knew that Teodorani work with them or for them...must check this.

....

I rest my case here. Im waiting for sceptics such as Lost Shaman, booNy, badeskov, psyche and others.
But I will now quote Einstein


We still do not know one thousandth of one percent of what nature has revealed to us.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#1534    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010

Posted 11 December 2012 - 05:00 PM

Cant find how it started.

But I got new case if we all agree to move one. :alien:

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#1535    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 4,955 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010

Posted 11 December 2012 - 05:04 PM

View Postthe L, on 11 December 2012 - 05:00 PM, said:

Cant find how it started.

But I got new case if we all agree to move one. :alien:

http://openseti.org/...ETI2002_OSI.htm

although please do post this new case....thanks :)


#1536    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010

Posted 11 December 2012 - 05:15 PM

Hi quilius, did you read conclusion?

....specific evidences of “structured targets” do not demonstrate at all, of course, that Hessdalen is subject to ET visitation.On the contrary it is even more reasonable to suspect that the governments which are at present possibly experimenting flying devices working with “exotic tecnology”, would choose locations just like Hessdalen in order to work with no disturb by putting into practice the best of the camouflages. The co-existence of anomalous lights of possible natural origin linked to the territory and of flying machines born from some mind of the “Skunk Works” might permit to some government to operate in total secret by letting the public opinion believe that Hessdalen is a alien basis. Therefore, the fact that some “structured events” in Hessdalen were recorded by EMBLA, is not a proof that Earth is visited by exogenous probes. Nevertheless this possibility in itself, as a pure work-hypothesis, is not at all excluded by official science, and it is included inside the plans

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#1537    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 4,955 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010

Posted 11 December 2012 - 05:23 PM

View Postthe L, on 11 December 2012 - 05:15 PM, said:

Hi quilius, did you read conclusion?

....specific evidences of “structured targets” do not demonstrate at all, of course, that Hessdalen is subject to ET visitation.On the contrary it is even more reasonable to suspect that the governments which are at present possibly experimenting flying devices working with “exotic tecnology”, would choose locations just like Hessdalen in order to work with no disturb by putting into practice the best of the camouflages. The co-existence of anomalous lights of possible natural origin linked to the territory and of flying machines born from some mind of the “Skunk Works” might permit to some government to operate in total secret by letting the public opinion believe that Hessdalen is a alien basis. Therefore, the fact that some “structured events” in Hessdalen were recorded by EMBLA, is not a proof that Earth is visited by exogenous probes. Nevertheless this possibility in itself, as a pure work-hypothesis, is not at all excluded by official science, and it is included inside the plans

hi L, yes I did, there is so much within that small paragraph to discuss that I think its best left for another time :)


#1538    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 11 December 2012 - 05:49 PM

View PostHarte, on 10 December 2012 - 08:56 PM, said:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that the proof was that there is no solution to the above.  IOW, there exist no three numbers (x, y, z) for which the above is true.

The proof has since been done, but in a very unsatisfying way ( using computers.)

Harte

No not really; the official proof was attributed to an English Mathematician named Andrew Wiles working out of Princeton if I recall.  The trouble is that only a dozen or so people in the whole world will ever understand it since it relies on very modern maths topics.  These maths topics however were not around in Fermat's time and so the question arises what proof did he actually have?  Some say he never had one; yet how could he make the claim with such intense assertion?

Edited by zoser, 11 December 2012 - 05:50 PM.

Posted Image


#1539    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 11 December 2012 - 05:56 PM

View PostImaginarynumber1, on 10 December 2012 - 08:29 PM, said:

Your comments on the Spanish watching and writing about these places being built, please?

They didn't.  There is no evidence that the Spanish Witnessed megalithic construction.


Your comments on why you continue to ignore the proof of how these things were done, please?

It's drivel.  The tools would not work.  They would never produce the accuracy - see Hopkins statement.


You comments on why aliens would drill holes in rocks, please?

Something functional needed to be achieved; understanding the properties of stones is important to this.  The Pyramid Generator theory is part of this idea, the other example being that Stonehenge is two types of stone; Saracen and Blue Stone; that must have been for a purpose.  Not defense, not ritual, not art; functionality.



Posted Image


#1540    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 11 December 2012 - 05:58 PM

View PostImaginarynumber1, on 10 December 2012 - 08:48 PM, said:

It s possible to do by hand, yet cannot be replicated with high tech tools? Come on. You can't seriously believe this AA crap?



This is just his speculation based upon what he would do.

Sure :whistle:

Posted Image


#1541    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:02 PM

View PostMyles, on 10 December 2012 - 09:15 PM, said:

To me he is saying that it would take great time and effort to do this, but it can be done.

Slave it''s extremely clear that when shown pictures of PP he said exactly what I wrote in the transcript.

No amount of spin can change that.  His second statement was referring to statues.  No spin will do.  He said what he said.

Posted Image


#1542    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:04 PM

View Postcormac mac airt, on 10 December 2012 - 09:19 PM, said:

Even when he says it can be done by hand, you stick your fingers in your ears and yell "La la la la la la, I can't hear you".  and "Nuh uh".

You've taken willfull ignorance to a whole new low.

cormac

Then you lose.

Posted Image


#1543    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,061 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:07 PM

View Postquillius, on 11 December 2012 - 11:27 AM, said:

hello,

please could you point to the part of the interview where he states he thinks its nonsense?

thanks

Jeesh, believe me, that's what Massino said. You'll have to watch the 5 parts for yourself; it's interesting enough..
Maybe he didn't use the word 'nonsense', but he sure didn't think much of it.


#1544    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,061 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:14 PM

View Postzoser, on 11 December 2012 - 05:56 PM, said:

Your comments on the Spanish watching and writing about these places being built, please?

-1- They didn't.  There is no evidence that the Spanish Witnessed megalithic construction.


Your comments on why you continue to ignore the proof of how these things were done, please?

-2- It's drivel.  The tools would not work.  They would never produce the accuracy - see Hopkins statement.


You comments on why aliens would drill holes in rocks, please?

Something functional needed to be achieved; understanding the properties of stones is important to this.  The Pyramid Generator theory is part of this idea, the other example being that Stonehenge is two types of stone; Saracen and Blue Stone; that must have been for a purpose.  Not defense, not ritual, not art; functionality.

-1- The Spanish did witness it, and wrote about it, like I showed you.

And Garcilaso de la Vega didn't witness it himself, but heard it from his uncle. GdlV was an Inca himself, and very much lived the life the Incas had lived for centuries.

-2-  Watch that video about the Hindus building a temple on Maoui. Archaic tools, lots of time and sweat, great accuracy.


#1545    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:41 PM

View PostAbramelin, on 11 December 2012 - 06:14 PM, said:

-1- The Spanish did witness it, and wrote about it, like I showed you.

And Garcilaso de la Vega didn't witness it himself, but heard it from his uncle. GdlV was an Inca himself, and very much lived the life the Incas had lived for centuries.

-2-  Watch that video about the Hindus building a temple on Maoui. Archaic tools, lots of time and sweat, great accuracy.

Yet they did not chose to emulate the superior style?  Even in their Churches?  Nah.  Doesn't wash Abe.  But then neither does showing people clips of 'soft' steel pounders and chisels and claiming it as a solution.

The Spanish being who they were would have exported that technique around the world before you could say 'monopoly'.

Posted Image