It seems still many people are totally positive about moon landings like I was 9 years back until one former NASA employee( I won’t disclose his name until I will be sure of safety of him and his family) told me that he is 1000% sure they never been to the moon.
In July 2001 one person who’s job was to maintaining the cables ,he told me his job was 1969 to deploying telephone cables between Nevada desert to Houston mission control and he said what was the damn reason to put telephone lines from HMC to Nevada Desert ? All people have been wondering why first very important moon landing telecast was so bad quality and poor resolution, this is the reason because they used telephone lines to transmit TV signals from Nevada to Houston mission control that’s why quality was so poor.
He said they used it to boost television signals of this drama from desert to Houston M.C.
That person was as well a witness of Apollo-1 fire. He said they took us 25 k.m. far bunkers along with 250 other technicians and an hour later brought us back saying opps it burnt! He said out of three astronauts one was against bogus landing program so they burnt three of them by breathing them pure oxygen which is flammable and making opening hatch towards in-side so once you pressurized the cabin it can not be open in case of emergency.
What about LEM’s exhaust nozzle metal, wouldn’t it change the color or loss the polish after running rocket engine 20 to 30 minutes? whole LEM looks brand shining new and unused on so called moon surface(even nozzles are unused and shining)That person told me that liquid propellant rocket engines produce extreme heat that it almost can weld the metal.
I am personally effected by NASA What happened on day of 16 Jan 2003 when I was watching tv news they showed Columbia launch (by normal front of launch tower camera) in Hindi news and I saw a huge piece of insulation foam (may be 5 by 12 feet) felling off from liquid fuel tank and did hit the left wing but in news they said “There was a problem of felling off piece of foam but launch was okay” but straight away I thought about ceramic tiles damage and scared about re-entry disaster but I thought may be there is a misunderstanding in news room so I waited for English journal but same sentence ,So I thought they are only paying attention on ascent of shuttle BUT this foam must damaged few tiles and you will need tiles during reentry and I was 100% sure of total explosion of shuttle if they come back with out home-work.
I had been trying for 4 days to email NASA but that time connection in our small town was bad so I couldn’t then i tried to convinced my self come-on Rajeev there are 10000 of scientists and they went on the moon, they must notice it and sort it out.
But unfortunately I couldn’t send the mail and nobody else cared of it, we lost shuttle and 7 people. I wrote an article about it and one leading news paper RAJASTHAN PATRIKA published it 3 weeks after on 9th march 2003 addition.
Now in November 09 at discovery TV NASA showed documentary series WHEN WE LEFT THE EARTH in episode of Columbia they said “There was only chance of saving Columbia if some body could see the felling off piece of foam and then could inform us ?! The fact is the whole world saw it including me and they mentioned it on TV news as well.
So doubtlessly NASA can cover up any shortcoming or negligence I feel so frustrated about it and some how I feel bit of responsible for it as well like if I could email them.
I have forgotten to debate about some more facts.
About Engine noise in LEM ,When moon landing advocates said that microphone was mounted in the space suit and was isolated from LEM’s` cabin atmosphere ,If you watch carefully the film you will observe that During computer overload the 1201 and 1202 alarm rang in the cabin and this could be heard loudly by same microphone so how it is possible to not hearing loud rocket engine noise in lunar module’s cabin ?
So I have more reasons to mistrust NASA.
What do you think about it?