236 replies to this topic

[Emma_Acid]

Do. You. Have. Any. Academic. Sources.

[the L]

Emma because you have best marks in school dont make you smart.

Emma_Acid, on 20 December 2012 - 01:57 PM, said:

Do. You. Have. Any. Academic. Sources.

1: 57 time of my post
1:57 time of Emma respond

Ignorance? Judge on your own.

[the L]

Its a simple test. Try it.

Hey Emma what do you say about my signature?

[Emma_Acid]

Well that boiled that argument down pretty quickly.

[the L]

Emma_Acid, on 20 December 2012 - 02:14 PM, said:

Well that boiled that argument down pretty quickly.

No it just prooved that beside you dont have manners and patience that you are ignorant.

[Emma_Acid]

I'll let the thread speak for itself I think.

[the L]

Emma_Acid, on 20 December 2012 - 02:23 PM, said:

I'll let the thread speak for itself I think.

Or you should wrote " ...". as you did on my black hole argument.

[the L]

Emma are you affraid to look trough telescope?
1:57/1:57 say -yes Im.

Lets stick with old mistake rather then hearing new voice.Amen.


Here is interesting article imho.

http://www.unexplain...howtopic=239451

Edited by the L, 20 December 2012 - 02:43 PM.

[the L]

Emma_Acid, on 20 December 2012 - 02:23 PM, said:

(Charles Darwin:) "...given the right evolutionary pressures and enough time, a polar bear can evolve into a whale-like species..."

Priceless.

[Emma_Acid]

the L, on 20 December 2012 - 02:24 PM, said:

Or you should wrote " ...". as you did on my black hole argument.

I was tempted.

the L, on 20 December 2012 - 02:25 PM, said:

Emma are you affraid to look trough telescope?
1:57/1:57 say -yes Im.

Lets stick with old mistake rather then hearing new voice.Amen.


Here is interesting article imho.

http://www.unexplain...howtopic=239451

Except evolution isn't an "old mistake".

As for the interesting article, thats how science works. It is ultimately self-critical. If that didn't happen, it would never advance.

Also, I think its a tad misleading. Its about Human evolution, not the theory as a whole.

[Emma_Acid]

the L, on 20 December 2012 - 02:49 PM, said:

Priceless.

*sigh*

Firstly, Darwin didn't say that. Secondly - what exactly is the problem with it?? You have yet to actually give a counter argument.

[Odin11]

the L, on 20 December 2012 - 02:49 PM, said:

Priceless.

Like Emma said, Darwin didn't say that. You can't just make stuff up and write it as fact.

Quote

"given the right evolutionary pressures and enough time, a polar bear can evolve into a whale-like species..."

There is a word missing. Its species. It should look like this:

"Given the right evolutionary pressures and enough time, a polar bear species can evolve into a whale-like species."

Everyone else reading this topic knew thats what Emma meant when she wrote it. So either you knew and chose to make fun of it for one little word missing, or you really have no understanding of evolution.

[Emma_Acid]

Oh Jesus. Please don't tell me he thought I meant that *an individual bear* can turn into a whale????

[The Id3al Experience]

Emma_Acid, on 20 December 2012 - 09:58 PM, said:

Oh Jesus. Please don't tell me he thought I meant that *an individual bear* can turn into a whale????

Thats what he is implying in sure, going off his signture, Id assume he mean 1 bear, can transform into a whale... Its the very thing alot of creationists or people that discount evloution seem to not understand.

The best way Evloution was taught to me was with Colours.

Example... Please tell me in the range of colours, does the colour actuall change? - point out to me were the colour is changed from Red to orange for exampe?
http://www.google.co...,r:62,s:0,i:279

The answer is there is no single point that the colour 'changes'. More that it merges, or evolves over the peroid of colours to eventually be Orange.

Red and by adding a little yellow each time, its slowly tranforms itself into a litler red, until it eventually is now orange.

This is how evolution works, DNA is mutated and the species slowly generation by generation changes, to eventually be another species.

Kind Regards,
Me

Edited by The Id3al Experience, 20 December 2012 - 10:14 PM.

[darkmoonlady]

Darwin died in 1882..why would anyone in their right mind want to debate his theories when we now have a vast mountain of information that expanded his original thinking? For what we knew at the time his ideas were revolutionary however over time some of them were incorrect and some were based on archaic biological knowledge. A lot of time has passed so why "the L" are you hung up on Darwin. It's like saying NASA and the moonlanding is BS because someone said the moon was made out of cheese. Theories evolve (no pun intended) so why are you attempting to debate things Darwin supposedly said? So what if he said them? With the knowledge he had the time they were good theories but we have come leaps and bounds in evolutionary biological thinking since then.