Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Loch Ness monster


  • Please log in to reply
52 replies to this topic

#31    lostinthecrowd

lostinthecrowd

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 109 posts
  • Joined:08 Apr 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

  • “Time is swift, it races by; Opportunities are born and die... Still you wait and will not try - A bird with wings who dares not rise and fly.”

Posted 16 September 2011 - 06:41 AM

-cough-thecreatureinthepicisaneeel-cough-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moray_eel

=T


#32    Bad kid

Bad kid

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 12 posts
  • Joined:05 Sep 2011

Posted 16 September 2011 - 07:12 PM

I do think there was a Loch Ness monster, which probably was an ancient sea creature dinosaur, but I think its dead now, lol.


#33    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,110 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:"Here the tide is ruled, by the wind, the moon and us."

  • God created the world, but the Dutch created the Netherlands

Posted 17 September 2011 - 03:41 PM

View Postlostinthecrowd, on 16 September 2011 - 06:41 AM, said:

-cough-thecreatureinthepicisaneeel-cough-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moray_eel

=T

It appears to be one of the more realistic possibilities:

http://lochnessmyste...-giant-eel.html


#34    Macroramphosis

Macroramphosis

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 312 posts
  • Joined:02 Nov 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:A travelling man

  • "The clever men at Oxford
    Know all that there is to be knowed.
    But they none of them know one half as much
    As intelligent Mr. Toad!"

Posted 17 September 2011 - 04:17 PM

View PostAbramelin, on 17 September 2011 - 03:41 PM, said:

It appears to be one of the more realistic possibilities:

http://lochnessmyste...-giant-eel.html

It is not a moray eel in the photo. I doubt a moray eel has set fin in that lake for several thousand years at least  -  unless it was wearing a wetsuit.

As for other eels, the largest species applicable to this area is the conger eel, which can reach at least 200lbs in weight, though the average eel is much smaller. As a marine animal though, it would have trouble living in the loch permanently. European freshwater eels do not attain anything like that size, with a 10lb fish being huge.






“You can't stay in your corner of the Forest waiting for others to come to you. You have to go to them sometimes.”

#35    Rafterman

Rafterman

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 6,771 posts
  • Joined:27 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate

Posted 17 September 2011 - 09:07 PM

View PostPersonFromPorlock, on 13 September 2011 - 10:34 PM, said:

The light source is at ten o'clock, except for 'Nessie's' humps, which are lit from three o'clock. Clever, these lake monsters.


Using Orson Wells voice, "they can bend time and light."

"You can't have freedom of religion without having freedom from the religious beliefs of other people."

#36    IllEatUrMind

IllEatUrMind

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 20 posts
  • Joined:18 Sep 2011
  • Gender:Female

  • Must Keep My Secrets Untold, Until The Wrongs Are Right, The Only One I Could Deceive

Posted 22 September 2011 - 07:55 AM

mmmmmmmm i kinda agree..........doesn't look like the great beast at All. sorry dude. haha


#37    SCHMITTHEAD

SCHMITTHEAD

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 28 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:new orleans baby!!!

  • good things come to those who wait!!

Posted 08 November 2011 - 05:56 PM

how come no EVVVVER has ANY clear photos or video, if there was an actual nessi or big foot wouldnt the news be all over it and why is it that when someone says "omg I have proof" its always fuzzy an can never see a clear anything???
just want solid,clear untouched proof.and more than just a foot print or a fin sticking outa the water.


#38    Skeptic18

Skeptic18

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 28 posts
  • Joined:07 Nov 2011
  • Gender:Female

  • "It is difficult to say what is impossible, for the dream of yesterday is the hope of today, and the reality of tomorrow"

Posted 08 November 2011 - 06:02 PM

<_< to me it just looks like part of the waves with something floating along with it , anyways does not look big enough to be the loch ness monster from the pictures ive seen -_- but it looks believable in a way just not in my point of view.


#39    zednuts

zednuts

    Extraterrestrial Entity

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 423 posts
  • Joined:25 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tanja Forest SE Australia

  • Ordinary Person

Posted 10 November 2011 - 02:37 PM

View PostSCHMITTHEAD, on 08 November 2011 - 05:56 PM, said:

how come no EVVVVER has ANY clear photos or video, if there was an actual nessi or big foot wouldnt the news be all over it and why is it that when someone says "omg I have proof" its always fuzzy an can never see a clear anything???
just want solid,clear untouched proof.and more than just a foot print or a fin sticking outa the water.

I took a photo of a lake monster once. I had my trusty pentax SLR but didn't even think of a zoom lens back then. The thing was about 500mts away rolling around in the middle of Chinnock Lagoon less than a k from my house. Photo turned out to be just a black dot  :hmm: The thing was about the width of a football and looping out of the water about a foot. We have world record size eels here but it was most likely a seal. My point is that photography is never easy especially of animals at more than 100 yards away.

cheers, zed who photographs.

Posted Image

#40    U. N.Owen

U. N.Owen

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 48 posts
  • Joined:07 Nov 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sometimes Central Russia, sometimes Central United Kingdom.

  • `I am too much of a sceptic to deny the possibilty of anything` T.H. Huxley

Posted 10 November 2011 - 07:08 PM

I have nothing constructive to say about the photo - except that I'm just pleased that it exists .It has put the Loch Ness phenomena back in focus after something of a hiatus. One issue that becomes really apparent on this and other threads about Loch Ness is that posters are uniformly either automatically sceptical or supercilious about the whole thing. Are there really no die-hard Nessiephiles out there? If there are, then they are sitting back while people are parading a whole lot of old chestnuts on-line. It is too wearisome to try to sort through them all here... but, for example, the one about there being NO sonar readings that appear to show something in the Loch is manifestly counterfactual,  as anyone who has read more than one book on the subject could tell you.

I do not really count myself as a Nessiephile, but I do sort of miss them. I am just about old enough to recall the Nessie hunting boys of the seventies and what a great deal of fun they were. They could give the modern day conspiracy-heads a run for their money that's for sure. Those guys were more hardware than software and got their hands dirty!

Come on Nicholas Witchell: leave them blasted Royals to it and get your ass back up to the Loch!





#41    _Only

_Only

  • Member
  • 6,633 posts
  • Joined:24 Oct 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northern California

  • Did you ever grow anything in the garden of your mind? You can grow ideas, in the garden of your mind. - Mr. Rogers

Posted 10 November 2011 - 07:57 PM

View PostU. N.Owen, on 10 November 2011 - 07:08 PM, said:

Are there really no die-hard Nessiephiles out there?

Possibly, but either their numbers have greatly dwindled, or they have gotten quieter, since 2003, when a sponsored full search was held at the Loch Ness, with 600 strategically placed sonar beams with satellite tracking. "The search had enough resolution to pick up a small buoy. No animal of any substantial size was found whatsoever and despite high hopes, the scientists involved in the expedition admitted that this essentially proved the Loch Ness monster was only a myth." That quote from the Wikipedia page on Nessie.

Edited by Jerry Only, 10 November 2011 - 07:57 PM.

I love to make mashups! Click here to hear!
I also love taking pictures! Click here to see!
I love to play drums, too! Whatever you do, don't click here!

#42    skookum

skookum

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,519 posts
  • Joined:28 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Sussex, UK

Posted 10 November 2011 - 09:49 PM

Looking at the famous surgeons photo it amazes me how quickly we accept something is a fake.  I mean the person who took the picture and was there never said it was a fake, yet anybody who comes forward after and claims fake it is case closed.  

This just shows how the odds are of finding evidence are against you. Not only will you be ridiculed from the beginning you will have armies of people trying to reconstruct a situation to make you out to be a liar.  Once you die that is it, only one person has to come forward and say you told them you faked it and then it becomes concrete proof.

It is a shame an equal number of people could not come forward and test scenario's to see if a picture could be feasible.

Posted Image

#43    _Only

_Only

  • Member
  • 6,633 posts
  • Joined:24 Oct 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northern California

  • Did you ever grow anything in the garden of your mind? You can grow ideas, in the garden of your mind. - Mr. Rogers

Posted 10 November 2011 - 10:05 PM

View Postskookum, on 10 November 2011 - 09:49 PM, said:

Looking at the famous surgeons photo it amazes me how quickly we accept something is a fake.  I mean the person who took the picture and was there never said it was a fake, yet anybody who comes forward after and claims fake it is case closed.  

This just shows how the odds are of finding evidence are against you. Not only will you be ridiculed from the beginning you will have armies of people trying to reconstruct a situation to make you out to be a liar.

If your presumed evidence is of a giant sea monster that has been able to somehow live in hiding in a lake for hundreds of years, despite all the people searching for it, yes, I agree, the odds in getting people to believe it are stacked against you.

I love to make mashups! Click here to hear!
I also love taking pictures! Click here to see!
I love to play drums, too! Whatever you do, don't click here!

#44    U. N.Owen

U. N.Owen

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 48 posts
  • Joined:07 Nov 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sometimes Central Russia, sometimes Central United Kingdom.

  • `I am too much of a sceptic to deny the possibilty of anything` T.H. Huxley

Posted 12 November 2011 - 01:37 AM

Good post Skookum! - although I personally never gave all that much credence to the Surgeon's photo. It's like the Ness equivalent of the Bigfoot shot by Patterson: too sensational and overblown too elucidate anything.Once something becomes iconic, the truth gets lost along the road. My favourite shot is the satellite picture discovered by a security guard a few years ago. This shows an outline of an apparent creature nearby a cruise ship.It is all the more compelling because it was found rather than deliberately taken. It has never been explained as far as I know.(It's probably on this site somewhere. If you find it, look at the side of the boat, not the boat itself.)

As for Jerry Only: I presume you are making reference to the BBC's attempted demolition job on the Ness phenomena of a few years back. Again it's hotly disputed (never, incidentally, rely on Wikipedia as your ONLY source of information: Rule One in any serious research!) Adrian Shine, the Loch's resident marine biologist ( with a reputation of something of a sceptic himself) had done a sonar sweep himself years earlier and this had apparently shown the presence of something. It  really comes down to how much weight  you  are prepared give to sonar technology. I'm not sure the military would want to rely on it  alone when doing surveillance, for example.

Also there are different ways you can read the data, viz:

* The creature may have hiding places in the form of underwater caves. Some even suggest that it can come and go from the sea via undiscovered tunnel routes.
* The creature may have become extinct. This would also account for the sharp drop in sightings in recent years. (I think this one is perfectly feasible).
*The creature may not be corporeal. It could be something along the lines of a `ghost` or time dilation,  and hence would elude sonar.

Sorry if I an coming across as a  wishful thinking die hard Nessiephile, but I really don't think that seventy odd years of eye witness reports, often from experienced observers and including some mass sightings, can be so easily dismissed - especially as there are Lake monster rumours in many of the Lakes of the Northern Hemisphere.

Also, people who wish to seriously discuss the phenomena should read some BOOKS on it and not just pick up a bit of internet back-chat. (A good start would be `The Loch Ness Enigma` by H. Bauer from 1988.)




#45    _Only

_Only

  • Member
  • 6,633 posts
  • Joined:24 Oct 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northern California

  • Did you ever grow anything in the garden of your mind? You can grow ideas, in the garden of your mind. - Mr. Rogers

Posted 12 November 2011 - 03:47 AM

quote edit turned into double post

Edited by Jerry Only, 12 November 2011 - 03:48 AM.

I love to make mashups! Click here to hear!
I also love taking pictures! Click here to see!
I love to play drums, too! Whatever you do, don't click here!




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users