lightly, on 31 December 2012 - 06:26 PM, said:
I'm not sure we should assume that so called primitive cultures don't posses a belief in or understanding of "rights" . Maybe , some think they are born with an inalienable right to hunt and fish, hang out with the guys, and kick back in the hammock when they feel like it. It's all a matter of beliefs?
Two points for consideration... the 1st being that what you call primitive cultures, will also be the ones to call you decadent. We seem to wheigh the value of others on a scale, and it invariably has us on top, and others lower down, thus we are the advanced culture, they are the primitive... that view has a number of errors in it, because it always depends on who is using the scale and what is being wheighed.
The 2nd is that there is a fundamental difference between unalienable rights an inalienable rights.
"
Unalienable: incapable of being alienated, that is, sold and transferred."
Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 1523:
You can not surrender, sell or transfer unalienable rights, they are a gift from the creator to the individual and can not under any circumstances be surrendered or taken. All individual's have unalienable rights.
Inalienable rights: Rights which are not capable of being surrendered or transferred without the consent of the one possessing such rights
.
Morrison v. State, Mo. App., 252 S.W.2d 97, 101.
You can surrender, sell or transfer inalienable rights if you consent either actually or constructively. Inalienable rights are not inherent in man and can be alienated by government. Persons have inalienable rights. Most state constitutions recognize only inalienable rights.
Source:
http://www.gemworld....unalienable.htm