97 replies to this topic

[RavenHawk]

Knight Of Shadows, on 07 May 2012 - 07:57 PM, said:

i posted evidence of this debate long ago am just not interested enough to get into it again
so i have to get into it with every new person comes flaming and wants to prove that he's right

Oh, I know I’m not 100% right but don’t tell me I’m wrong.  I would love to see your evidence.  You don’t have to repost it.  If it’s out there, then a link will be just as good.

Quote

you in the west weren't born yesterday .. but your western friends got the nerves to twist reality to suit their agenda as much as they can
they'd make us walk on four to prove us wrong if they have to .. therfore am not really interested in this debate .. neither i got time or mood for it

I’m not interested in how “they” twist things.  I just want to see the data and determine for myself.  You obviously have some example in mind that I don’t.

Quote

that's why i comment funny notices .. not that it's far fetched from the western historians to suggest such thing .. i don't think it's impossiable really
they might actually be hipporcate enough to do it

It would be totally irresponsible to do so, but I would agree that some probably do.  But then let’s indentify them.

Quote

just like they act hippocrates when they kill arab childrens in excuse of nuclear weapons which was never found in iraq

How many more Arab children would have been killed if Iraq and Iran had both acquired the bomb?  They were both on course to do just that.  Do you not understand that the environment in which Saddam had his WMD was not conducive to inspection?  Oh yeah right, the great US and the IEAE inspectors could find anything at anytime, anywhere.  That is myth.  If inspectors were allowed into this nation, given our trucking system, nothing would have been found either.

Quote

just like osama bin laden photo shope fixed pic all we got from " leader of quada " a fake concept
they can fool you around all they like .. but like i said we got our own historians .. we don't take the bull**** of the west for real as history

It was clear that that photo was a fake.  I hope this is not one of your examples of the West twisting things.  That just doesn’t fly.  If you thought that was real, I’ve got some good farmland to sell you.

[Knight Of Shadows]

RavenHawk, on 14 May 2012 - 05:44 PM, said:

I wish to second that concern.  When I first heard of that last major car bomb attack and hadn’t noticed you on, my thoughts were of you.  That has got to be a scary time for you.  Be safe.

thanks for your concern man not to worry we can only die once bomb or not if we're fated to die we're gonna die any other way .. if not no bomb can kill ya

[Knight Of Shadows]

RavenHawk, on 14 May 2012 - 06:14 PM, said:

Oh, I know I’m not 100% right but don’t tell me I’m wrong.  I would love to see your evidence.  You don’t have to repost it.  If it’s out there, then a link will be just as good.


I’m not interested in how “they” twist things.  I just want to see the data and determine for myself.  You obviously have some example in mind that I don’t.


It would be totally irresponsible to do so, but I would agree that some probably do.  But then let’s indentify them.


How many more Arab children would have been killed if Iraq and Iran had both acquired the bomb?  They were both on course to do just that.  Do you not understand that the environment in which Saddam had his WMD was not conducive to inspection?  Oh yeah right, the great US and the IEAE inspectors could find anything at anytime, anywhere.  That is myth.  If inspectors were allowed into this nation, given our trucking system, nothing would have been found either.


It was clear that that photo was a fake.  I hope this is not one of your examples of the West twisting things.  That just doesn’t fly.  If you thought that was real, I’ve got some good farmland to sell you.

this debate is really old i remember having it with people in like years ago
the main concern was that canaanites are arabs .. one of the tribes that immigrated from arabia ages B.C
however in the western history they tend to deny that for certain agenda
our historians have explained it though .. check out "Mokademat Ibn Khaldon " on history and there's many other who written history
" before it was corrupted or influneced by politics agendas " thing is am just not in mood for that debate honestly
it'll take time and effort to find all that info and links again and am unwilling

and how many childrens died in american invasion of iraq ? you know that " civilians casulities " reached half a million ?
you know usa bombed a shelter filled with women and children ? you know they raped women in abu graib ? you know they forced men to sodomy in that prison ?
do you know  what kinda of sexual torture they used on women in abu graib ? if you don't know all of those or won't admit it
then we're in deep ****

if you don't find those things disgusting enough how can you find terrorists attacks disgusting ?
and for bin laden .. they lied to you about the pic .. they lied to you about al quada .. they lied to you about 911
they basically lied to you about everything ..
so how come they didn't lie to you about history as well ?
especially israel is their beloved ally they'd say the moon is purple if they had to for israel
and funny thing ... you'd believe them

Edited by Knight Of Shadows, 14 May 2012 - 07:20 PM.

[MichaelW]

Knight Of Shadows, on 14 May 2012 - 09:26 AM, said:

did you actually looked at my post ?! seriously !! there's cure for your condition though .. don't worry don't lose hope

Yes and no there was no answer. Just yet another mindless rant about Israel.

What the Jordanians and Egyptians did is as every bit relevant for this topic. Tell me Knight, why did they occupy the West Bank and the Gaza Strip?

[Yamato]

MichaelW, on 11 May 2012 - 02:06 AM, said:

I didn't say Arabs didn't have roots. I'm saying Canaanites aren't Arabs. It's a pity your undeducated head can't comprehend that.

Also, the "West" has an agenda? That is fantastic. Seriously, I don't have to put much in responses because Knight can already discredit himself. He's done so already.

Come back when you can present a credible argument rather than parroting what your leaders told you to say.

If New Zealand was putting up with half the international attention that the Middle East is, even you might get a whiff that there's an agenda behind it and the news doesn't just happen in a vacuum for no reason.

If "the Arabs" from the Middle East were coming to your island, arming some of your leaders with weapons and dropping bombs on New Zealander families turning them into so much hamburger meat, only the most unenlightened of all New Zealanders wouldn't think "the Arabs" have an agenda.  But they're thousands of miles away from your Islamophobic bubble, and you think they have an agenda.   How convenient.  

"The West"'s military forces are repeatedly invading someone else's lands, not vice versa.   That's "the difference".   Of course you won't acknowledge that fact, there can only be more spittle-flecked abuse from you while your blatant anti-Muslim agenda drones ever on.

Attacking other nations in war is the most damning sign of an agenda one can possibly ask for.   The West's agenda is explained by every bureaucrat of every western power dropping bombs in the Middle East.   The crying children who look into the dead eyes of their mothers and fathers are far more prescient.    They at least ask the haunting question why their parent(s) are dead, because some crooked western bureaucrat's war speech explaining his agenda won't be satisfactory to them.

[MichaelW]

Yamato, on 15 May 2012 - 03:04 AM, said:

If New Zealand was putting up with half the international attention that the Middle East is, even you might get a whiff that there's an agenda behind it and the news doesn't just happen in a vacuum for no reason.

As there really isn't much on the news about Israel, I don't get what you mean. Certainly, I have seen a lot of coverage of other events in the Middle East such as Syria and Bahrain.

Media companies put out what they think will give them the biggest profits. Apart from Fox News, Russia Today and a whole host of obscure state owned media channels in various tinpot dictatorships worldwide, media are generally absent from the political scheme.

So no, there is no Zionist agenda behind the world's media.

Quote

If "the Arabs" from the Middle East were coming to your island, arming some of your leaders with weapons and dropping bombs on New Zealander families turning them into so much hamburger meat, only the most unenlightened of all New Zealanders wouldn't think "the Arabs" have an agenda.  But they're thousands of miles away from your Islamophobic bubble, and you think they have an agenda.   How convenient.

Islamaphobic? I have no problem with the Arab people, only their leaders. Once again, that mind of yours is running wild. At what point have I exhibited "Islamhphobic" behaviour?

As for the rest of that quote, try to find something that makes sense to people who are not extraterrestrials like yourself.  

Quote

"The West"'s military forces are repeatedly invading someone else's lands, not vice versa.   That's "the difference".   Of course you won't acknowledge that fact, there can only be more spittle-flecked abuse from you while your blatant anti-Muslim agenda drones ever on.

Attacking other nations in war is the most damning sign of an agenda one can possibly ask for.   The West's agenda is explained by every bureaucrat of every western power dropping bombs in the Middle East.   The crying children who look into the dead eyes of their mothers and fathers are far more prescient. They at least ask the haunting question why their parent(s) are dead, because some crooked western bureaucrat's war speech explaining his agenda won't be satisfactory to them.

Once again, Yamato has stuck his nose in where it doesn't belong and once again, shows that he can discredit himself without so much is making a single reasonably logical point. Listen, how about you go back to worshipping Hitler and I'll get back to demanding questions from the people responsible for the deaths of thousands.

[acidhead]

MichaelW, on 15 May 2012 - 10:30 AM, said:

As there really isn't much on the news about Israel, I don't get what you mean. Certainly, I have seen a lot of coverage of other events in the Middle East such as Syria and Bahrain.

Media companies put out what they think will give them the biggest profits. Apart from Fox News, Russia Today and a whole host of obscure state owned media channels in various tinpot dictatorships worldwide, media are generally absent from the political scheme.

So no, there is no Zionist agenda behind the world's media.



Islamaphobic? I have no problem with the Arab people, only their leaders. Once again, that mind of yours is running wild. At what point have I exhibited "Islamhphobic" behaviour?

As for the rest of that quote, try to find something that makes sense to people who are not extraterrestrials like yourself.  




Once again, Yamato has stuck his nose in where it doesn't belong and once again, shows that he can discredit himself without so much is making a single reasonably logical point. Listen, how about you go back to worshipping Hitler and I'll get back to demanding questions from the people responsible for the deaths of thousands.

Take a deep breath, release and count to ten.  Repeat three times.

[MichaelW]

acidhead, on 15 May 2012 - 02:29 PM, said:

Take a deep breath, release and count to ten.  Repeat three times.

I'm not Islamophobic and despite what your Arab friend and extraterestrial brother think, I do not and have not expressed hatred for Muslims because of their religion. As I said, I don't have any problems with the Arab people or whatever religion that they practiced. I just have problems with their leaders.

It's not difficult to understand.

[Yamato]

MichaelW, on 15 May 2012 - 10:30 AM, said:

As there really isn't much on the news about Israel, I don't get what you mean. Certainly, I have seen a lot of coverage of other events in the Middle East such as Syria and Bahrain.

Media companies put out what they think will give them the biggest profits. Apart from Fox News, Russia Today and a whole host of obscure state owned media channels in various tinpot dictatorships worldwide, media are generally absent from the political scheme.

So no, there is no Zionist agenda behind the world's media.



Islamaphobic? I have no problem with the Arab people, only their leaders. Once again, that mind of yours is running wild. At what point have I exhibited "Islamhphobic" behaviour?

As for the rest of that quote, try to find something that makes sense to people who are not extraterrestrials like yourself.  




Once again, Yamato has stuck his nose in where it doesn't belong and once again, shows that he can discredit himself without so much is making a single reasonably logical point. Listen, how about you go back to worshipping Hitler and I'll get back to demanding questions from the people responsible for the deaths of thousands.

A Zionist agenda for the world's media?   The Zionist agenda is the strengthening of Israel.   I have philosophical and human differences with the policies that Zionists rely on to do that.  I find it reprehensible and wrong, not only for Palestinians but Palestinians and Israelis both.

If you also agree with me that you only have a problem with Arab leaders, then appeal to the Arab people in an empathetic way that they will listen to you.  Insisting that they must be continuously stolen from and killed -- while they kowtow to your political views, apologize for something you'll cherry pick over, change their behavior towards Israel in a way that every New Zealander needs, or whatever else you want for them to do -- is never going to happen.   It's like Gene Simmons said, if someone comes into my house to steal from me, I'll blow him away dead.   Why this single standard of logic is impossible for you to apply to Palestinians you will never admit.

[Yamato]

And if your problem, michaelw, is only with "Arab leaders" then please make a point to correct the rest of the Zionist kool aid team here when they constantly refer to "the Arabs".  You're so bereft of criticism in the face of this happening hundreds of times on countless discussions you participate in, I have to get the idea you agree with it.  

It would help clarify your true position to name those Arab leaders you're referring to, too.  Surely if you've narrowed the problem down to individuals in "the Arabs'" leadership, you can also find good examples of other individuals who would do an adequate job at leading "the Arabs" (who?).

[Knight Of Shadows]

he's just bluffing his problem with arabs is not with leaders it's just his excuse for acting aggressive
his problem with arabs is that .. we don't see his beloved israel and usa as the angels he wants us to see
his problem with us is that we " disagree " with his thoughts
so in his opinion we should be forced to think what he think for us is right .. considering us aren't smart enough or on the level to think for our self
and he also think we should be invaded by usa and say " thank u " and we should be hit by israel and say " thanks "
that .. in michael's mind makes the perfect arab

well new flash .. it ain't gonna happen .. and personally i enjoy being thorn in his side and i'll always disagree

[and then]

Bottom line is that the majority of ME Arabs are greedy, hateful people who act like children where the State of Israel is concerned.  Spiteful and deadly children to be sure but still just children.  They are willing to raise up what should be an adult's most precious possession - their children - and train them to love death and hate.  This is sick and twisted and there can never be an excuse for it.  All ostensibly for a tiny sliver of land.  Land they don't need or, truth be told, never even wanted until Jews settled it.  I was taught that you never get in the way when your enemy is happily destroying themselves.  Let them continue to bleed if that's what they want.  Maybe if it goes on long enough the Israeli's will learn to value the hudna as a tactic as well.  Wouldn't THAT be funny to observe.

[MichaelW]

Yamato, on 16 May 2012 - 04:06 AM, said:

A Zionist agenda for the world's media?   The Zionist agenda is the strengthening of Israel.   I have philosophical and human differences with the policies that Zionists rely on to do that.  I find it reprehensible and wrong, not only for Palestinians but Palestinians and Israelis both.

You mean "I support the control of the land by one religious group over another because of an even more shaky claim based on fantasy". Those philosophical and "human" differences? I've seen your true colours and claiming humanity is just the lowest you can possibly go.

Quote

If you also agree with me that you only have a problem with Arab leaders, then appeal to the Arab people in an empathetic way that they will listen to you.

Tried, failed. It's not my problem that the people allow their leaders to do terrible things without speaking out against it. Knight's continued support for Bashar al-Assad is a good example. How can I be empathetic with someone who supports mass murder? How can I reason with someone who does not wish to use the rights that all human beings are born with and deserve to have?

Quote

Insisting that they must be continuously stolen from and killed -- while they kowtow to your political views, apologize for something you'll cherry pick over, change their behavior towards Israel in a way that every New Zealander needs, or whatever else you want for them to do -- is never going to happen.   It's like Gene Simmons said, if someone comes into my house to steal from me, I'll blow him away dead.   Why this single standard of logic is impossible for you to apply to Palestinians you will never admit.

Because there are no standards. All parties involved have blood on their hands and claiming otherwise is basically naive and biased. I know that's difficult for you infantile mind to understand but that's reality. Although even then, reality for you is warped by your bigoted hate for Jews.

[Yamato]

MichaelW, on 16 May 2012 - 08:22 AM, said:

You mean "I support the control of the land by one religious group over another because of an even more shaky claim based on fantasy". Those philosophical and "human" differences? I've seen your true colours and claiming humanity is just the lowest you can possibly go.



Tried, failed. It's not my problem that the people allow their leaders to do terrible things without speaking out against it. Knight's continued support for Bashar al-Assad is a good example. How can I be empathetic with someone who supports mass murder? How can I reason with someone who does not wish to use the rights that all human beings are born with and deserve to have?



Because there are no standards. All parties involved have blood on their hands and claiming otherwise is basically naive and biased. I know that's difficult for you infantile mind to understand but that's reality. Although even then, reality for you is warped by your bigoted hate for Jews.

MichaelW, on 16 May 2012 - 08:22 AM, said:

You mean "I support the control of the land by one religious group over another because of an even more shaky claim based on fantasy". Those philosophical and "human" differences? I've seen your true colours and claiming humanity is just the lowest you can possibly go.



Tried, failed. It's not my problem that the people allow their leaders to do terrible things without speaking out against it. Knight's continued support for Bashar al-Assad is a good example. How can I be empathetic with someone who supports mass murder? How can I reason with someone who does not wish to use the rights that all human beings are born with and deserve to have?



Because there are no standards. All parties involved have blood on their hands and claiming otherwise is basically naive and biased. I know that's difficult for you infantile mind to understand but that's reality. Although even then, reality for you is warped by your bigoted hate for Jews.

Quote

You mean "I support the control of the land by one religious group over another because of an even more shaky claim based on fantasy". Those philosophical and "human" differences? I've seen your true colours and claiming humanity is just the lowest you can possibly go.

Jesus is fantasy?  Incredible!  You should alert the church of this immediately.

Quote

Because there are no standards. All parties involved have blood on their hands and claiming otherwise is basically naive and biased.

Okay?

Quote

Tried, failed. It's not my problem that the people allow their leaders to do terrible things without speaking out against it. Knight's continued support for Bashar al-Assad is a good example. How can I be empathetic with someone who supports mass murder? How can I reason with someone who does not wish to use the rights that all human beings are born with and deserve to have?

I didn't say for you to be empathetic to Bashar al-Assad, I said for you to be empathetic with the Arab people.  That's what you just claimed you were capable of, differentiating the Arabs from their leaders.  And you fall right into the first hole you possibly can when in the very next reply you forget all about your hollow claim about the Arabs.   I can see the people through their government; you can't.  You have to see the government and keep talking about the government because your opinion about someone's government is how you see its people.

Quote

I know that's difficult for you infantile mind to understand but that's reality. Although even then, reality for you is warped by your bigoted hate for Jews.

You'll have to quote me where I talked about blood not being on some party's hands.  That's not what I said, and that's not the difference.  The difference between me and you is, I respect the human rights of all people.  You can sit there and ignore that some people's rights are being forcibly denied and some peoples' aren't.   Your racism about "Arabs" and "Jews" notwithstanding that, because humanity doesn't care what the characteristic of someone is first before it respects their human rights.   We care about the rights of Palestinians, because as you Zionists constantly love to remind us, Israelis live freely and have rights in Israel that are humane by any country's standard.

Edited by Yamato, 16 May 2012 - 09:43 AM.

[Knight Of Shadows]

and then, on 16 May 2012 - 08:01 AM, said:

Bottom line is that the majority of ME Arabs are greedy, hateful people who act like children where the State of Israel is concerned.  Spiteful and deadly children to be sure but still just children.  They are willing to raise up what should be an adult's most precious possession - their children - and train them to love death and hate.  This is sick and twisted and there can never be an excuse for it.  All ostensibly for a tiny sliver of land.  Land they don't need or, truth be told, never even wanted until Jews settled it.  I was taught that you never get in the way when your enemy is happily destroying themselves.  Let them continue to bleed if that's what they want.  Maybe if it goes on long enough the Israeli's will learn to value the hudna as a tactic as well.  Wouldn't THAT be funny to observe.

knowing we get on your nerves is satisfying fact enough for me to live happy with forever after