Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Birth Defects Epidemic after Iraq invasion


  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

#31    Karlis

Karlis

  • Member
  • 8,614 posts
  • Joined:19 Jul 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 21 October 2012 - 07:51 AM

New Study: US, NATO Responsible for Massive Birth Defects in Iraq
TEHRAN (FNA)- A new scientific study confirmed the earlier findings that the weapons and ammunition used NATO troops during the US-led war on Iraq caused widespread and irreparable damage to the health of the Iraqi population, including a sharp rise in birth defects in the country.


... Dr Ahmad Hardan, who served as a special science adviser to the World Health Organization, the United Nations and the Iraqi Ministry of Health, said in 2011 that there is scientific evidence linking depleted uranium to cancer and birth defects.

According to Iraqi doctors, cancer cases suddenly and sharply increased after both the 1991 war and the 2003 US invasion of the Muslim country.

Abdulhaq Al-Ani, author of "Uranium in Iraq" recently said that the incubation period for depleted uranium is five to six years, which is consistent with the spike in cancer rates in 1996-1997 and 2008-2009.

Not everyone is ready to draw a direct correlation between allied bombing of these areas and tumors, and the Pentagon has been skeptical of any attempts to link the two. But Iraqi doctors and some Western scholars say the massive quantities of depleted uranium used in the US and British bombs, and the sharp increase in cancer rates are not unconnected.

The water, soil and air in large areas of Iraq, including Baghdad, are contaminated with depleted uranium ...
Read more


#32    and then

and then

    Abyssus Abyssum Invocat

  • Member
  • 13,632 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land's End

  • Because what came before never seems enough...

Posted 21 October 2012 - 08:30 AM

View PostKarlis, on 21 October 2012 - 07:51 AM, said:

New Study: US, NATO Responsible for Massive Birth Defects in Iraq
TEHRAN (FNA)- A new scientific study confirmed the earlier findings that the weapons and ammunition used NATO troops during the US-led war on Iraq caused widespread and irreparable damage to the health of the Iraqi population, including a sharp rise in birth defects in the country.


... Dr Ahmad Hardan, who served as a special science adviser to the World Health Organization, the United Nations and the Iraqi Ministry of Health, said in 2011 that there is scientific evidence linking depleted uranium to cancer and birth defects.

According to Iraqi doctors, cancer cases suddenly and sharply increased after both the 1991 war and the 2003 US invasion of the Muslim country.

Abdulhaq Al-Ani, author of "Uranium in Iraq" recently said that the incubation period for depleted uranium is five to six years, which is consistent with the spike in cancer rates in 1996-1997 and 2008-2009.

Not everyone is ready to draw a direct correlation between allied bombing of these areas and tumors, and the Pentagon has been skeptical of any attempts to link the two. But Iraqi doctors and some Western scholars say the massive quantities of depleted uranium used in the US and British bombs, and the sharp increase in cancer rates are not unconnected.

The water, soil and air in large areas of Iraq, including Baghdad, are contaminated with depleted uranium ...
Read more
Hard and dense and toxic to the body in the same ways lead can be.  It's nasty stuff but a report like this coming from the Fars News Agency I would take with a box of salt.  I didn't know that D.U. actually has less radioactivity than natural Uranium.....
http://en.wikipedia....epleted_uranium

  We've cast the world, we've set the stage,
  for what could be, the darkest age...

#33    Karlis

Karlis

  • Member
  • 8,614 posts
  • Joined:19 Jul 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 21 October 2012 - 10:29 AM

View Postand then, on 21 October 2012 - 08:30 AM, said:

Hard and dense and toxic to the body in the same ways lead can be.  It's nasty stuff but a report like this coming from the Fars News Agency I would take with a box of salt.  I didn't know that D.U. actually has less radioactivity than natural Uranium.....
http://en.wikipedia....epleted_uranium
Here are a few excerpts concerning depleted uranium (DU) from the site you give. These points do "seem" to suggest that DU could be responsible (to as yet undetermined percentage of cases) for the increase in birth defects, etc.

The aerosol or spallation frangible powder produced during impact and combustion of depleted uranium munitions can potentially contaminate wide areas around the impact sites, leading to possible inhalation by human beings.[9]

A 2005 epidemiology review concluded: "In aggregate the human epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of birth defects in offspring of persons exposed to DU."[10] { <<< However, an evasive WHO proviso follows this ... which is also criticised.}

"the aerosol produced during impact and combustion of depleted uranium munitions can potentially contaminate wide areas around the impact sites or can be inhaled by civilians and military personnel."[9]

the UK Pensions Appeal Tribunal Service in early 2004 attributed birth defect claims from a February 1991 Gulf War combat veteran to depleted uranium poisoning.[69][70] Also, a 2005 epidemiology review concluded: "In aggregate the human epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of birth defects in offspring of persons exposed to DU."[10]

Human epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of birth defects in the offspring of persons exposed to DU.[10] A 2001 study of 15,000 February 1991 U.S. Gulf War combat veterans and 15,000 control veterans found that the Gulf War veterans were 1.8 (fathers) to 2.8 (mothers) times more likely to have children with birth defects.[96] After examination of children's medical records two years later, the birth defect rate increased by more than 20%: "Dr. Kang found that male Gulf War veterans reported having infants with likely birth defects at twice the rate of non-veterans. Furthermore, female Gulf War veterans were almost three times more likely to report children with birth defects than their non-Gulf counterparts. The numbers changed somewhat with medical records verification. However, Dr. Kang and his colleagues concluded that the risk of birth defects in children of deployed male veterans still was about 2.2 times that of non-deployed veterans."[97]
In early 2004, the UK Pensions Appeal Tribunal Service attributed birth defect claims from a February 1991 Gulf War combat veteran to depleted uranium poisoning.[98][99] Children of British soldiers who fought in wars in which depleted uranium ammunition was used are at greater risk of suffering genetic diseases such as congenital malformations, commonly called "birth defects," passed on by their fathers. In a study of U.K. troops, "Overall, the risk of any malformation among pregnancies reported by men was 50% higher in Gulf War Veterans (GWV) compared with Non-GWVs."[100]

Source: http://en.wikipedia....epleted_uranium


#34    Mr Right Wing

Mr Right Wing

    Poltergeist

  • Banned
  • 2,924 posts
  • Joined:16 Nov 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 21 October 2012 - 10:48 AM

View PostAtlantia, on 15 October 2012 - 06:35 PM, said:

Iraqi Birth Defects: Fallujah And Basra Babies Brain Damaged After UK-US Bombardment, Study Finds

Babies born in the cities at the heart of the US and UK's bloodiest military campaigns in Iraq are more likely to have heart defects, deformed limbs and brain damage, according to a new report.

In the survey, more than half of all babies who were conceived after the US invasion of Fallujah were born with birth defects. Before the siege, it was one in 10.
Graphic images of babies with twisted limbs, organs forming on the outside of bodies and inflated skulls are included in the study headed by University of Michigan researchers.

http://www.huffingto...l?utm_hp_ref=uk

This is usually a sign that they're experimenting on the local population.

Dont drink the water, dont take their medications and grow your own food.


#35    lightly

lightly

    metaphysical therapist

  • Member
  • 5,801 posts
  • Joined:01 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan U.S.A.

  • "The future ain't what it used to be"
    Yogi Berra

Posted 21 October 2012 - 12:16 PM

View Postand then, on 20 October 2012 - 08:20 PM, said:

This the intention, in your view?  To what purpose?  I do not agree with Iraq but I still don't believe it was some sort of grand MIC conspiracy either.


  Control.  .. to affect economic policies in the region.   I always like to say that politics is the business of creating appealing excuses for Economic policies.  In the case of our 'involvement' in the region i would add war to the list of excuses.   Remember ...  we went to war in Iraq (the second time)  because "the army is there" (RUMSFELD).      If the reason for the second Iraq war was simply the removal of Saddam H. ...  that could have been accomplished  any number of other ways far less costly in resources (and HUMAN LIFE)   ,, but no,  because costly  was high on the list of true purposes.  Costly in resources$$$$$$$  during the destructive and restorative phases.... and costly in human life to ensure a substantial enough resistance to justify our 'being there'.     It takes very few "leaders" to chart the course for all of the followers.  Followers say  ..Yes Sir.

I always think back to the illegal secret bombing of Laos and Cambodia during thew twilight of the Vietnam War. It was already known  the war was a loser and that we would be pulling out, and yet,  aprox.  200 million TONS of bombs were poured out on Laos and Cambodia.  BOMBS=MONEY.

   All blah blah aside ... Historically , wars have for the most part,  been fought for CONTROL  ..  and primarily  economic control ... and , not surprisingly,  they still are•

Important:  The above may contain errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and other limitations.

#36    lightly

lightly

    metaphysical therapist

  • Member
  • 5,801 posts
  • Joined:01 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan U.S.A.

  • "The future ain't what it used to be"
    Yogi Berra

Posted 24 October 2012 - 12:37 PM

EXAMPLE:
http://www.aljazeera...3134071641.html

   Western oil firms remain as US exits Iraq

The end of the US military occupation does not mean Iraqis have full CONTROL of their oil.


Baghdad, Iraq - While the US military has formally ended its occupation of Iraq, some of the largest western oil companies, ExxonMobil, BP and Shell, remain.


On November 27, 38 months after Royal Dutch Shell announced its pursuit of a massive gas deal in southern Iraq, the oil giant had its contract signed for a $17bn flared gas deal.


Three days later, the US-based energy firm Emerson submitted a bid for a contract to operate at Iraq's giant Zubair oil field, which reportedly holds some eight million barrels of oil.


Earlier this year, Emerson was awarded a contract to provide crude oil metering systems and other technology for a new oil terminal in Basra, currently under construction in the Persian Gulf, and the company is installing control systems in the power stations in Hilla and Kerbala.


Iraq's supergiant Rumaila oil field is already being developed by BP, and the other supergiant reserve, Majnoon oil field, is being developed by Royal Dutch Shell. Both fields are in southern Iraq.


According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), Iraq's oil reserves of 112 billion barrels ranks second in the world, only behind Saudi Arabia. The EIA also estimates that up to 90 per cent of the country remains unexplored, due to decades of US-led wars and economic sanctions.


"Prior to the 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq, US and other western oil companies were all but completely shut out of Iraq's oil market," oil industry analyst Antonia Juhasz told Al Jazeera. "But thanks to the invasion and occupation, the companies are now back inside Iraq and producing oil there for the first time since being forced out of the country in 1973."



◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊



Important:  The above may contain errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and other limitations.

#37    and then

and then

    Abyssus Abyssum Invocat

  • Member
  • 13,632 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land's End

  • Because what came before never seems enough...

Posted 24 October 2012 - 01:59 PM

The fact that these companies are operating without troops backing them should tell you something.

  We've cast the world, we've set the stage,
  for what could be, the darkest age...

#38    lightly

lightly

    metaphysical therapist

  • Member
  • 5,801 posts
  • Joined:01 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan U.S.A.

  • "The future ain't what it used to be"
    Yogi Berra

Posted 24 October 2012 - 02:20 PM

...  that they use private security guards?...  that the "Threat' has always been exaggerated,  Selectively ?..  that we bullied most resistance out of the locals?  ... so what?

  The  major oddly ignored  Fact remains that the invasion coincided with Saddam H's decision to trade Iraqi oil for Euros ,  instead of dollars.     ... CONTROL•

Important:  The above may contain errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and other limitations.

#39    lightly

lightly

    metaphysical therapist

  • Member
  • 5,801 posts
  • Joined:01 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan U.S.A.

  • "The future ain't what it used to be"
    Yogi Berra

Posted 24 October 2012 - 02:27 PM

http://www.democracy...ts_miscarriages


Study: U.S. Bombings Caused "Staggering Increases" in Iraqi Birth Defects, Miscarriages


A new study has provided further evidence of the damage to Iraqi public health caused by the 2003 U.S. invasion and occupation. The Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology found "staggering increases" in Iraqi birth defects and miscarriages in the Iraqi cities of Basra and Fallujah, which both endured heavy U.S. bombing. Iraqi children were found to have elevated levels of mercury and lead, key elements in the manufacture of bullets and bombs. Overall, the study says U.S. bombings have left a "footprint of metal in the population," causing a "public health crisis." Next March will mark the Iraq War’s 10th anniversary.


Important:  The above may contain errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and other limitations.

#40    and then

and then

    Abyssus Abyssum Invocat

  • Member
  • 13,632 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land's End

  • Because what came before never seems enough...

Posted 24 October 2012 - 03:15 PM

View Postlightly, on 24 October 2012 - 02:20 PM, said:

...  that they use private security guards?...  that the "Threat' has always been exaggerated,  Selectively ?..  that we bullied most resistance out of the locals?  ... so what?

  The  major oddly ignored  Fact remains that the invasion coincided with Saddam H's decision to trade Iraqi oil for Euros ,  instead of dollars. ... CONTROL•
I seem to recall almost DAILY pipeline sabotage for awhile.  Bottom line is if the Iraqis didn't want those companies there they couldn't pump a drop - silly conspiracy theories or not.

  We've cast the world, we've set the stage,
  for what could be, the darkest age...

#41    lightly

lightly

    metaphysical therapist

  • Member
  • 5,801 posts
  • Joined:01 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan U.S.A.

  • "The future ain't what it used to be"
    Yogi Berra

Posted 25 October 2012 - 12:15 AM

View Postand then, on 24 October 2012 - 03:15 PM, said:

I seem to recall almost DAILY pipeline sabotage for awhile.  Bottom line is if the Iraqis didn't want those companies there they couldn't pump a drop - silly conspiracy theories or not.

Yes,   some seem to resent ours and others  PRESENCE  in their country.        .. and... we now do business with a different group of Iraqis than .. previously ?
..silly conspiracy theories or not.

Important:  The above may contain errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and other limitations.

#42    and then

and then

    Abyssus Abyssum Invocat

  • Member
  • 13,632 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land's End

  • Because what came before never seems enough...

Posted 25 October 2012 - 01:12 AM

View Postlightly, on 25 October 2012 - 12:15 AM, said:

Yes,   some seem to resent ours and others  PRESENCE  in their country. .. and... we now do business with a different group of Iraqis than .. previously ?
..silly conspiracy theories or not.
It takes a handful of militants to sabotage a pipeline.  The Iraqis as a nation are ready to put this behind them and do business.  It is SILLY to think they don't want the oil companies there or that we are arm twisting.  The only way the pipelines start burning again is if they feel the $ isn't being shared equally.

  We've cast the world, we've set the stage,
  for what could be, the darkest age...

#43    lightly

lightly

    metaphysical therapist

  • Member
  • 5,801 posts
  • Joined:01 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan U.S.A.

  • "The future ain't what it used to be"
    Yogi Berra

Posted 25 October 2012 - 12:08 PM

View Postand then, on 25 October 2012 - 01:12 AM, said:

It takes a handful of militants to sabotage a pipeline. The Iraqis as a nation are ready to put this behind them and do business.  It is SILLY to think they don't want the oil companies there or that we are arm twisting.  The only way the pipelines start burning again is if they feel the $ isn't being shared equally.

  Well, I'm glad someone understands "the iraqis as a nation"  ...   referring to the entire nation as   they   clearly demonstrates the depth  and range of that understanding.
..not that i have a much better understanding of the situation..  a little less naive perhaps.

Important:  The above may contain errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and other limitations.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users