25 replies to this topic

[Robbie333]

Along with law enforcement and an anonymous hacker over forty child porn sites were taken down with over 1500 users identified. My hats off to these individuals for bringing to light and getting rid of some of these vermin.

http://www.theblaze....ver-1500-users/

Edited by Still Waters, 25 October 2011 - 11:16 PM.
Changed source link direct to the news article

[tipotep]

Robbie333, on 25 October 2011 - 10:13 PM, said:

Along with law enforcement and an anonymous hacker over forty child porn sites were taken down with over 1500 users identified. My hats off to these individuals for bringing to light and getting rid of some of these vermin.

http://www.theblaze....sers/          

Agreed Robbie , good to see the scum is being sorted out .

TiP.

Edited by Still Waters, 25 October 2011 - 11:18 PM.
Changed quoted source link

[Order66]

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety from some ******* in a Guy Fawkes mask that he stole from V for Vendetta because he couldn't come up with anything original , deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Next poster: "Oh so you defend child porn? durdurdur"
Me: Yes that was exactly my point.

[conspiracybeliever]

Good for them!!  

[Murrangurk]

Halloween78, on 25 October 2011 - 11:39 PM, said:

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety from some ******* in a Guy Fawkes mask that he stole from V for Vendetta because he couldn't come up with anything original , deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Next poster: "Oh so you defend child porn? durdurdur"
Me: Yes that was exactly my point.

there's always one.

god bless you anon!!!

[skylight1]

They doin' something right.

[thatRobGuy]

Good. For every innocent pic there is a child in danger. When you take adavantage of a person young or old, anybody who cannot take care of themselves, the penalty should be high. The highest.

[Rocketgirl33]

I read this artical on Huffington Post a couple days ago and I thought Anonymous was asking for help on this one because they just did not have enough resources to really put a stop to the servers. They said they could shut them down but it was temporary and they needed to get more people involved to put the child porn rings out of business permenatly. I like what they are doing, for now. But who is going to stop them once they gain total control of the internet? Who is going to shut them down once they get to big for their own good? Right now everything they are doing is awesome and in most cases needed to be done a long time ago. But once they have stoped the porn and the bankers and the facebookers and ect..ect.. who knows where they will turn? Will the vigalanty become the ciminal? And who will shut them down?

I will be watching this one closely because history has proven time and again that the ones in power today are the ones being chased down the street with pitchforks tomarrow!! I admire them for putting these child porn sites out of business, law enforcement does not have the money or the means to pursue these creepers, so Anonymous is doing law enforcement from all countries a big favor for going after these pigs. I just hope they know when to stop.


Rocketgirl

[Robbie333]

Halloween78, on 25 October 2011 - 11:39 PM, said:

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety from some ******* in a Guy Fawkes mask that he stole from V for Vendetta because he couldn't come up with anything original , deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Next poster: "Oh so you defend child porn? durdurdur"
Me: Yes that was exactly my point.

       Look, I am not that bright so could you decipher your post for me and give me a point. I just did not know how to take this one. Go on...

[Order66]

Robbie333, on 26 October 2011 - 02:16 PM, said:

Look, I am not that bright so could you decipher your post for me and give me a point. I just did not know how to take this one. Go on...

Hey do you mind? We're trying to have a conversation here  

[Robbie333]

Halloween78, on 26 October 2011 - 02:32 PM, said:

Hey do you mind? We're trying to have a conversation here  

    Oh, I get it. Rudeness is your point. Sorry to butt in...boy.

[Order66]

Robbie333, on 26 October 2011 - 02:37 PM, said:

Oh, I get it. Rudeness is your point. Sorry to butt in...boy.

I did not mean to be rude, I was just kidding around. I did have a point originally but I just didn't want to try to support it, too much work  

[Robbie333]

Halloween78, on 26 October 2011 - 02:42 PM, said:

I did not mean to be rude, I was just kidding around. I did have a point originally but I just didn't want to try to support it, too much work  

        Whatever

[dekker87]

Halloween78, on 25 October 2011 - 11:39 PM, said:

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety from some ******* in a Guy Fawkes mask that he stole from V for Vendetta because he couldn't come up with anything original , deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Next poster: "Oh so you defend child porn? durdurdur"
Me: Yes that was exactly my point.

i understand your 'point'.

you don't understand the issue.

[Robbie333]

dekker87, on 26 October 2011 - 03:43 PM, said:

i understand your 'point'.

you don't understand the issue.

     Thank you Dek