Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Second-Hand Smoking Damages Memory


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1    Render

Render

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,080 posts
  • Joined:23 Nov 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 02 October 2012 - 10:13 PM

Quote

ScienceDaily (Sep. 11, 2012) — Non-smokers who live with or spend time with smokers are damaging their memory, according to new research from Northumbria University.

The findings, published in the latest online edition of the journal Addiction is the first study to explore the relationship between exposure to other people's smoke and everyday memory problems.
Dr Tom Heffernan and Dr Terence O'Neil, both researchers at the Collaboration for Drug and Alcohol Research Group at Northumbria University, compared a group of current smokers with two groups of non-smokers -- those who were regularly exposed to second-hand smoke and those who were not.
Those exposed to second-hand smoke either lived with smokers or spent time with smokers, for example in a designated "smoking area," and reported being exposed to second-hand smoke for an average of 25 hours a week for an average of four and a half years.
The three groups were tested on time-based memory (remembering to carry out an activity after some time) and event-based memory (which refers to memory for future intentions and activities).
Researchers found that the non-smokers who had been exposed to second-hand smoke forgot almost 20% more in the memory tests than those non-smokers not exposed. However, both groups out-performed the current smokers who forgot 30% more than those who were not exposed to second-hand smoking.

http://www.scienceda...20911091340.htm

So maybe ppl can think again when they claim other ppl shouldn't be bothered when they smoke because it only affects their body.


#2    Ashotep

Ashotep

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 7,450 posts
  • Joined:10 May 2011
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:USA

  • Courage is being scared to death but saddling up anyway-John Wayne

Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:06 PM

I'm not saying that this isn't true but how do they know the person didn't have the memory problem to begin with.


#3    The Id3al Experience

The Id3al Experience

    Paranormal Investigator

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 829 posts
  • Joined:20 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand

  • "Live with cause and leave results to the great law of the universe, passing each day in peaceful contemplation"

Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:39 PM

View PostRender, on 02 October 2012 - 10:13 PM, said:

http://www.scienceda...20911091340.htm

So maybe ppl can think again when they claim other ppl shouldn't be bothered when they smoke because it only affects their body.

Or maybe non smokers can still stop complaining, nowsdays smoking is outside, and if you are a non smoker hanging around a smoker, dont blame the smoker. you have a choice, its not like smokers come up to people and hang around them to pass off their second hand smoke.

Posted Image

#4    lightly

lightly

    metaphysical therapist

  • Member
  • 6,066 posts
  • Joined:01 Apr 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan U.S.A.

  • "The future ain't what it used to be"
    Yogi Berra

Posted 03 October 2012 - 01:07 AM

do ya forget the one in your first hand?   .      .      .

Important:  The above may contain errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and other limitations.

#5    Likely Guy

Likely Guy

    Undecided, mostly.

  • Member
  • 4,903 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Likely, Canada

  • I might have been born yesterday but, I've been up all night.

Posted 03 October 2012 - 02:16 AM

If that's true, then smokers should be continuously forgetting where they put their keys, wallet, glasses etc.

Such is not the case, so I respectfully call "BS".


#6    The Silver Thong

The Silver Thong

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,233 posts
  • Joined:02 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary Alberta Canada

Posted 03 October 2012 - 02:52 AM

Man kind has been smoking how long and if this was the case when the majority smoked society would have been fubard. I call this BS anti smoking propaganda.

Sittin back drinkin beer watchin the world take it's course.


The only thing god can't do is prove he exists ?

#7    FurthurBB

FurthurBB

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,380 posts
  • Joined:21 May 2008

Posted 03 October 2012 - 03:00 AM

View PostRender, on 02 October 2012 - 10:13 PM, said:

http://www.scienceda...20911091340.htm

So maybe ppl can think again when they claim other ppl shouldn't be bothered when they smoke because it only affects their body.

This doesn't make a lot of sense because other studies have shown that smoking a cigarette can improve memory, like if you smoke right before a test.  I do not see why when exhaled it would have the opposite effect.  I would like to see some more study into this area.


#8    Likely Guy

Likely Guy

    Undecided, mostly.

  • Member
  • 4,903 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Likely, Canada

  • I might have been born yesterday but, I've been up all night.

Posted 03 October 2012 - 03:14 AM

How large was the study group?


#9    The Silver Thong

The Silver Thong

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,233 posts
  • Joined:02 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary Alberta Canada

Posted 03 October 2012 - 03:17 AM

View PostLikely Guy, on 03 October 2012 - 03:14 AM, said:

How large was the study group?

Probably a very select group that belong to hitler like anti smoking groups.

Sittin back drinkin beer watchin the world take it's course.


The only thing god can't do is prove he exists ?

#10    Cybele

Cybele

    Married to the Void

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,432 posts
  • Joined:26 Jan 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • Prick your finger it is done
    The moon has now eclipsed the sun
    The angel has spread its wings
    The time has come for bitter things

Posted 03 October 2012 - 03:41 AM

The article doesn't say anything about what was done to control for bias or confounding, so it would be premature to make any sort of conclusions based on the information provided. There's not much doubt that second-hand smoke is harmful, however.

My sig: "Cryptorchid", Marilyn Manson

#11    Cybele

Cybele

    Married to the Void

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,432 posts
  • Joined:26 Jan 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • Prick your finger it is done
    The moon has now eclipsed the sun
    The angel has spread its wings
    The time has come for bitter things

Posted 03 October 2012 - 03:58 AM

View PostLikely Guy, on 03 October 2012 - 03:14 AM, said:

How large was the study group?

http://onlinelibrary...4056.x/abstract

Another case of bad mainstream science journalism. They didn't give the reader enough information and warped the authors' "may suffer impairment" into a title making a defnitive statement.

Edited by Cybele, 03 October 2012 - 04:03 AM.

My sig: "Cryptorchid", Marilyn Manson

#12    The Silver Thong

The Silver Thong

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,233 posts
  • Joined:02 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary Alberta Canada

Posted 03 October 2012 - 04:13 AM

Msg and aspertame plus soda and potatoe chips can create the same results. I bet most monsanto gm foods do the same.

Sittin back drinkin beer watchin the world take it's course.


The only thing god can't do is prove he exists ?

#13    MissMelsWell

MissMelsWell

    Cosmic Baker

  • Member
  • 13,255 posts
  • Joined:12 Feb 2007
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 03 October 2012 - 04:39 AM

They say it's the nicotine that actually improves memory when you smoke. I dunno about that either. I couldn't find my keys when I was a smoker, I quit 7 months ago, with a nicotine replacement therapy, and I still can't find my keys. :blush:  LOL

I've never quite figured out what it was about 2nd hand smoke that was so different from first hand.

I'm guessing here: exhaled smoke should have been somewhat filtered after it's been pillaged by the cilia in the smokers lungs. These are the fibers that trap the tar, many particles, and other nastiness that goes along with smoking.

Or do they consider second hand smoke to be the smoke emitting directly from the burning cigarette (which would then make it first hand smoke?)

It's just something I've always wondered about. LOL.

Oh and I'm pretty proud that I've been smoke free for 7 months. Thanks to a good quality ecig. The anti-smoking freaks have been trying to get those banned too though... but I can tell ya, my lung capacity came back, I can actually freaking run now, I don't stink anymore, my teeth are slowly getting better, and my skin has really really improved! Lovin them.

"It's time for the American people to stand up and shrug off the shackles of our government at TSA at the airport"  Ron Paul

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin

#14    Likely Guy

Likely Guy

    Undecided, mostly.

  • Member
  • 4,903 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Likely, Canada

  • I might have been born yesterday but, I've been up all night.

Posted 03 October 2012 - 05:47 AM

View PostCybele, on 03 October 2012 - 03:58 AM, said:

http://onlinelibrary...4056.x/abstract

Another case of bad mainstream science journalism. They didn't give the reader enough information and warped the authors' "may suffer impairment" into a title making a defnitive statement.
There you go. Thanks Cybele. 73 people were studied.


#15    Render

Render

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,080 posts
  • Joined:23 Nov 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 03 October 2012 - 07:06 AM

for all the ppl doubting the study:



Aims


Prospective memory (PM: remembering future intentions and activities) is critical to everyday remembering. This study compared a group of never-smokers who reported regular exposure to second-hand smoke (the SHS group) with a group of current smokers (the CS group) and a group of never-smokers who reported never having been exposed to SHS (the Non-SHS group) on objective PM.

Design


An existing groups design was employed to compare the SHS, CS and Non-SHS group.

Participants and setting


27 SHS, 27 CS and 29 Non-SHS were tested on objective PM. All participants were university undergraduates aged between 18 –30 years. All participants were tested individually in a laboratory setting.

Measurements


The Cambridge Prospective Memory Test (CAMPROMPT) was used to assess objective PM. Age, other drug use, mood and IQ were also measured as covariates in the study.

Findings


The Non-SHS group recalled significantly more time-based PM tasks than the SHS group (Means = 16.3 versus13.7, p <.001) and significantly more than the CS group (CS Mean = 11.6, p <.001); and the SHS group recalled significantly more time-based tasks than the CS group (p <.002). The Non-SHS group recalled significantly more event-based PM tasks than the CS group (Means = 15.2 versus 11.3, p <.002) with no significant difference between the Non-SHS group and SHS group (SHS Mean = 14.3, p =.234); and the SHS group recalled significantly more event-based tasks than the CS group (p <.001).

Conclusion


Non-smokers exposed to secondhand smoke may suffer impairment in time-based prospective memory

http://onlinelibrary...DD6EDF16.d03t04



This was a normal amount of ppl to study, the important factor is the statistical signifance. p <.001 and p <.002. This is VERY statiscal significant.
That is what gives the study merit here. So saying it is poorly executed and the results aren't worth anything is BS.

I don't expect ppl to understand all the research terms, but just blatantly posting that the study is false without even understanding it is annoying to say the least.
And how emotional everybody gets when the effects of second hand smoke or even first hand are being researched, it's not like I posted something about torture ok. Relax and take in the information.

View Postbones101proof, on 03 October 2012 - 12:19 AM, said:

What about first hand smokers, does smoking cause memory loss? I'm a smoker myself but I think memory loss is the least of my health concerns. It's bad, I know.

So it also concluded that non (second hand) smokers recalled more time based PM tasks than smokers.



If ppl were to find more memory related studies, i'd like to see them.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users