Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * - - 6 votes

[Merged] Did we land on the moon?

nasa apollo hoax

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2593 replies to this topic

#1966    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 30,396 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 20 May 2013 - 10:51 PM

View Postturbonium, on 19 May 2013 - 08:14 AM, said:

We were quite naive. Ignorance is bliss, as they say!

Well, we have been telling you what was  wrong with your claims, comments and such, but I am glad that you are now coming around to reality that the Apollo moon conspiracy folks have been so naive and ignorant of the facts after all these years.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#1967    DONTEATUS

DONTEATUS

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 17,404 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2008

Posted 21 May 2013 - 01:27 AM

Its the Ignorance part that gets them all toung Tied !

This is a Work in Progress!

#1968    mrbusdriver

mrbusdriver

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,557 posts
  • Joined:19 Dec 2007

Posted 21 May 2013 - 05:24 PM

Spinebreaker, was your question about the background/foreground adequately explained?
It's a common thing here in COS, Pikes Peak being some 14 miles away. You can move hundreds of feet laterally, and the mountain appears the same, with significant foreground changes.


#1969    turbonium

turbonium

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,342 posts
  • Joined:14 Mar 2005

Posted 25 May 2013 - 06:51 AM

View Postflyingswan, on 19 May 2013 - 10:19 AM, said:

Does the fact that you've had to repost this so often give you even the tiniest hint that it was poorly phrased in the first place?

It's "poorly phrased"?

"My post was mostly meant to be tongue-in-cheek.

"Running on fumes" was one thing. But especially when I said.....

NASA coined the phrase "What you don't know can't hurt you" during the Gemini program.

Now, that one should have clued you in!!


You're much too serious these days, my old friend...."




I said my post was mostly meant to be tongue-in-cheek.

You get it so far, yes? Let's go on...

After I said my post was mostly meant in jest, I cited two specific examples.

I said "running on fumes" was one thing, but the 'NASA' quote in particular should have clued him (MID) in

Then, I tell MID that he's much too serious "these days".  


It's not about being "poorly phrased", it's about you being in denial.


You deny the fact I had ALREADY explained the quote before you ever chirped on about it. Nothing you try will ever change that fact.

You can't even admit I spoke about the quote, let alone I explained it. That's huge denial, methinks.


#1970    flyingswan

flyingswan

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,845 posts
  • Joined:13 Sep 2006

Posted 25 May 2013 - 12:16 PM

View Postturbonium, on 25 May 2013 - 06:51 AM, said:

It's "poorly phrased"?
Does reposting it yet again make it any better?

"Man prefers to believe what he prefers to be true" - Francis Bacon (1561-1626)
In which case it is fortunate that:
"Science is the best defense against believing what we want to" - Ian Stewart (1945- )

#1971    ChrLzs

ChrLzs

    Just a contributor..

  • Member
  • 3,098 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2009

Posted 25 May 2013 - 12:52 PM

I guess Spinebreaker has lost interest?

I think we will have to assume he has seen the light, and would rather this little foray into Apollo denial be forgotten..

___
All my posts about Apollo are dedicated to the memory of MID - who knew, lived and was an integral part of, Apollo.

#1972    turbonium

turbonium

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,342 posts
  • Joined:14 Mar 2005

Posted 02 June 2013 - 08:30 AM

View Postflyingswan, on 25 May 2013 - 12:16 PM, said:

Does reposting it yet again make it any better?

Well, it emptied out your lame 'excuse bin', so that makes it better.

Edited by turbonium, 02 June 2013 - 08:33 AM.


#1973    Ove

Ove

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 606 posts
  • Joined:08 Apr 2009

Posted 22 December 2013 - 01:06 PM

View PostCzero 101, on 15 April 2013 - 06:53 AM, said:

View Postcoolguy, on 15 April 2013 - 04:15 AM, said:

Why did the astronauts say they are watching us meaning the aliens.
Because a part of me is saying the landing was a hoax
Which astronauts, when and where? Source please.
Why would you have to pretend not knowing this, Czero 101 ?

Both Buzz Aldrin and Edgar Mitchel spoke of UFOs


#1974    Ove

Ove

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 606 posts
  • Joined:08 Apr 2009

Posted 22 December 2013 - 01:20 PM

View PostSpinebreaker, on 15 May 2013 - 09:46 PM, said:

I have not read the full 128 pages of this thread, or the preceding 128,000  pages that came before.  I have skimmed about 30 pages from various places and I don't think this has been suggested anywhere.  This is my very own personal theory, based on 2 things I consider absolute fact.

1 - In July, 1969.  Edwin, Michael and Neil went to the moon.  They collected data, rock samples, did other aspects of their job, and then came home.  Basically, we have been to the moon.

2 - Some of the photo's taken by Apollo 11's crew are incredibly odd/anomalous.  These anomalies have not been explained to my satisfaction.  (Your satisfaction level may be different...)

So, my theory...

Collins and the other 2 nipped off to the moon, and did their jobs, just as the official story records.  Now, the camera's used by the Apollo missions at the time, were 70mm Hasselblad camera's; Chest mounted.  Pretty damn good at the time. Now I dunno if any of you have left a roll of film in a suitcase that gets X-Rayed at an airport...  It ruins the pictures.

Is it possible, that after getting to the moon and back, safely, within the decade JFK said it would happen, our heroes return to Terra Firma only to discover that the Camera's were not shielded enough from X-ray's and other forms of radiation/energy they would encounter and the film was blank?  Rather than admit this pretty basic error, someone at NASA chose to fake some photo's to keep the people happy...  Probably not possible, probably not likely.  But a lot more likely than the whole mission being fake...

It's just a theory...

It's a good theory, the photos were obviously not taken on the moon. The problem is, why won't they admit it ? is it because they weren't on the moon at all ?

Edited by Ove, 22 December 2013 - 01:20 PM.


#1975    frenat

frenat

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,955 posts
  • Joined:22 Jun 2005

Posted 22 December 2013 - 01:32 PM

View PostOve, on 22 December 2013 - 01:20 PM, said:

It's a good theory, the photos were obviously not taken on the moon. The problem is, why won't they admit it ? is it because they weren't on the moon at all ?
No.  it is because your "theory" that "the photos were obviously not taken on the moon" has no evidence to support it whatsoever.

-Reality is not determined by your lack of comprehension.
-Never let facts stand in the way of a good conspiracy theory.
-If I wanted to pay for commercials I couldn't skip I'd sign up for Hulu Plus.
-There are no bad ideas, just great ideas that go horribly wrong.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law

#1976    aquatus1

aquatus1

    Forum Divinity

  • 19,365 posts
  • Joined:05 Mar 2004

Posted 22 December 2013 - 01:40 PM

And here I was hoping this thread had finally seen the end of its trainwreck of a run.


#1977    Rafterman

Rafterman

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,549 posts
  • Joined:27 Sep 2010

Posted 22 December 2013 - 01:44 PM

Where's the "Did the Chinese land on the moon?" thread?

"You can't have freedom of religion without having freedom from the religious beliefs of other people."

#1978    Czero 101

Czero 101

    Earthshattering Kaboom

  • Member
  • 5,187 posts
  • Joined:24 Dec 2007

Posted 22 December 2013 - 05:29 PM

View PostOve, on 22 December 2013 - 01:06 PM, said:

Why would you have to pretend not knowing this, Czero 101 ?

You DO realize that asking someone for a source for their claim does not in any way equate to "pretending not to know" about the topic, right?

Quote

Both Buzz Aldrin and Edgar Mitchel spoke of UFOs

Yes. I know. Buzz was observing a spend rocket stage and Mitchell was speaking of a personal, metaphysical revelation he had while on his flight.

Neither are proof of aliens: "UFO" simply means "Unidentified Flying Object" and the use of that term doesn't mean that Klingons were warping through our solar system and Mitchell's personal opinion of alien intelligence is no proof whatsoever of anything other than his personal beliefs.


Now, please go troll somewhere else.....







Cz

"Thinking is critical, because sense is not common..." - GreaterSapien

"For it is the natural tendency of the ignorant to believe what is not true. In order to overcome that tendency it is not sufficient to exhibit the true; it is also necessary to expose and denounce the false." – H. L. Mencken

#1979    mrbusdriver

mrbusdriver

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,557 posts
  • Joined:19 Dec 2007

Posted 22 December 2013 - 05:46 PM

View PostOve, on 22 December 2013 - 01:06 PM, said:

Why would you have to pretend not knowing this, Czero 101 ?

Both Buzz Aldrin and Edgar Mitchel spoke of UFOs

Ahhh, so they both DID fly to the Moon...got it.


#1980    Ove

Ove

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 606 posts
  • Joined:08 Apr 2009

Posted 22 December 2013 - 07:28 PM

View Postmrbusdriver, on 22 December 2013 - 05:46 PM, said:

Ahhh, so they both DID fly to the Moon...got it.
Yes, I think that's what they trying to say, with their UFO stories, wonder why ?