Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

More Ravings from Clark McClelland


  • Please log in to reply
85 replies to this topic

#61    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,049 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 07 March 2013 - 03:15 PM

View Postpsyche101, on 07 March 2013 - 08:16 AM, said:

You did not ask me, but I will tell you anyway :D

Not for a second.

Just a curious question mate, have you had a peruse of his website?

Hey Psyche, no I havent.

Just to confirm though, you are saying that he does not believe in aliens/ETH right? and is making claims he 'knows' are incorrect?


#62    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 31,830 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 08 March 2013 - 03:20 AM

View Postbee, on 07 March 2013 - 10:30 AM, said:

I think it's you that has a thing for Jim... backing him up all the time.

It's very sweet of you to give him your unwavering support and I'm sure he appreciates it.... :D



Ohh, Bee, can't you see? He does not even know I am alive, it's unrequited.
But yes, I do actually think a great deal of Jim, I was watching P&T at home last week, and Jim came on, I yelled out to my wife and kids, "see that guy! I actually have spoken with him on the net!" and then a few days later he was on the Aussie news about the russian meteor, and agin, I called to the entire family and did say "Now that's one smart man", and I do believe that because I have read his website. Well, a fair bit of it anyway. I still do not understand how you see people Like Hoagland as more credible Bee, but I suspect it takes quite some effort.

Have you seen both websites, as I asked?

I even have a picture Bee. Howzat. 2 very smart men.

Posted Image



Edited by psyche101, 08 March 2013 - 03:29 AM.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#63    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 31,830 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 08 March 2013 - 03:27 AM

View Postquillius, on 07 March 2013 - 03:15 PM, said:

Hey Psyche, no I havent.

Just to confirm though, you are saying that he does not believe in aliens/ETH right? and is making claims he 'knows' are incorrect?

Gidday Mate

Yes I do, have a look at this (the website), and hen get back to me mate ;)

Cheers.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#64    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 31,830 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 08 March 2013 - 04:08 AM

View Postbee, on 07 March 2013 - 10:38 AM, said:

wouldn't that depend on the time of day and the position of Mars?

There is a 14 hour time difference...so is it really impossible?

This is a genuine question and if anyone else into astonomy can answer it, that would be good, ta.


http://www.happyzebr...-Pittsburgh.php


.


Good question Bee, in fact good enough to show you are too smart to fall for the stuff you make out that you believe in ;) I'd say you're onto something here, not so much with the time difference, but the relative position:

Quote

@. . . . . . . . . . . Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:27:48 -0400
From: "Tom & Karen Dobbins" <kmdobbins@coshocton.com>
Reply-To: "Tom & Karen Dobbins" <kmdobbins@coshocton.com>
To: "Masatsugu MINAMI" <VZV03210@nifty.ne.jp>
Cc: <rfienberg@skypub.com>
Subject: Saheki, McClelland, and Tasaka versus 2001 observations -- FINAL CORRECTED VERSION

Here are the parameters that prevailed at the time of Saheki and McClelland's 1954 sightings and Tasaka's 1958 sighting of flares at Edom Promintorium, generated by Jeff Beish's WIMP program:

1.) Saheki  July 1, 1954 13:15 UT

De = 0.5 degrees Ds = -5.1 degrees  (De + Ds)/2 = -2.3 degrees = nominal Martian latitude of source of specular reflection, assuming horizontal orientation.

Phase = 6.9 degrees (post date of opposition)  CM = 319 degrees   319 - (6.9/2) = ~315 degrees = nominal Martian longitude of source of specular reflection, assuming horizontal orientation.

Based on Saheki's large-scale drawings, it is possible to determine the site of the presumed reflection that he witnessed with considerable precision (conservatively +/- 3 degrees of latitude and longitude). The latitude does indeed appear to be at about the nominal position of -2 or -3 degrees, but the longitude of the flare appears to be at 356 degrees.  356 - 315 = 41 degrees.  This corresponds to a surface inclined by about 41 degrees from the horizontal (wow!) on an east-west axis.

2.) McClelland  July 24, 1954  4:32 UT

De = -2.9 degrees Ds = -10.6 degrees  (De + Ds)/2 = -6.7 degrees = nominal Martian latitude of source of specular reflection, assuming horizontal orientation.

Phase = 24.9 degrees (post date of opposition)  CM = 346 degrees   346 - (24.9/2) = ~ 333.5 degrees = nominal Martian longitude of source of specular reflection, assuming horizontal orientation.

McClelland's sketch also permits the site of the reflection to be determined with considerable precision (conservatively +/- 3 degrees of latitude and longitude). The latitude appears to be at about -2 degrees, tolerably close to the -6.7 degrees predicted, suggesting a north-south inclination of 6.7-2 = <5 degrees, but the longitude appears to be located at 356 degrees or thereabouts.  356 - 333.5 = 22.5 degrees.  This corresponds to a surface inclined about 22.5 degrees from the horizontal on an east-west axis, and in the same direction as in the case of Saheki's observation.

3.) Tasaka   November 21, 1954 13:35 UT

De = -13.6 degrees Ds = -11.4 degrees  (De + Ds)/2 = -12.5 degrees = nominal Martian latitude of the source of specular reflection, assuming horizontal orientation.

Phase = 4.5 degrees (post date of opposition)  CM = 331.5 degrees   331.5 - (4.5/2) = ~ 329 degrees = nominal Martian longitude of source of specular reflection, assuming horizontal orientation.

Based on Tasaka's beautiful drawing, the latitude of the source (about -2 degrees) differs from the nominal -12.5 degrees by about 10 degrees.  The longitude of the flare lies at about 355 degrees. 355 - 329 = 26 degrees. This corresponds to a surface inclined by 26 degrees from the horizontal on an east-west axis.

These phenomena seem to be rather insensitive to geometry, causing me to wonder why they are not seen far more frequently. Or are they routinely written off to effects of atmospheric turbulence and tricks of the eye, and hence go unreported? It may emerge that last week's success in Florida was as much a matter of dumb luck as keen insight.


LINK

Looks like they saw Ice reflecting. Bolding mine.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#65    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 31,830 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 08 March 2013 - 04:09 AM

View PostLord Vetinari, on 06 March 2013 - 02:50 PM, said:

Are you willing to consider that Mr. O and any other Skeptic might be telling the turth, and what they say should be considered fairly, or, because they say that Mr. McC, and Mr. H, and Mr. G, are kooks & charlatans, do you dismiss what they say out of hand? i.e. do you only take notice of what people say who say what you want to hear?

Can't be seen to be publicly agreeing with the Illuminati now can we :lol:

Edited by psyche101, 08 March 2013 - 04:09 AM.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#66    DBunker

DBunker

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,485 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • I prefer to know, not just to believe.

Posted 08 March 2013 - 04:23 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 08 March 2013 - 03:20 AM, said:

I even have a picture Bee. Howzat. 2 very smart men.


Posted Image


Phil is shorter (or maybe Jim is taller) than I expected. :)

Now that communications technology has made it possible to give global reach to the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and women of reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe element. James S. Robbins

#67    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 31,830 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 08 March 2013 - 04:25 AM

View PostDBunker, on 08 March 2013 - 04:23 AM, said:

Phil is shorter (or maybe Jim is taller) than I expected. :)

Apparently Jim is very, very tall according to Phil, he said that was how he spots him in a crowd.

And Phil is very, very good at standing still for a very long time.

Edited by psyche101, 08 March 2013 - 04:26 AM.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#68    DBunker

DBunker

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,485 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • I prefer to know, not just to believe.

Posted 08 March 2013 - 04:28 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 08 March 2013 - 04:25 AM, said:

Apparently Jim is very, very tall according to Phil, he said that was how he spots him in a crowd.

And Phil is very, very good at standing still for a very long time.

I heard him on Startalk (with Neil DeGrasse Tyson) a couple of times. Love that show.

Now that communications technology has made it possible to give global reach to the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and women of reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe element. James S. Robbins

#69    bee

bee

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 10,609 posts
  • Joined:24 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England

Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:22 PM

View Postpsyche101, on 08 March 2013 - 03:20 AM, said:

Ohh, Bee, can't you see? He does not even know I am alive, it's unrequited.

how sad...never mind...he will notice you now after your previous post about the Mars sighting..of what-ever-it was.... :w00t:  


Quote

I even have a picture Bee. Howzat.



Posted Image




zat is, again...very sweet of you...... :P



View Postpsyche101, on 08 March 2013 - 04:25 AM, said:

Apparently Jim is very, very tall according to Phil, he said that was how he spots him in a crowd.

And Phil is very, very good at standing still for a very long time.


But only when he is strapped to the wall with a black belt thingy......like in your pic..... :innocent:



.

Posted Image


#70    bee

bee

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 10,609 posts
  • Joined:24 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England

Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:42 PM

View PostJimOberg, on 06 March 2013 - 03:08 PM, said:

Note also his claim he is the only other human who ALSO saw via telescope that Mars explosion in 1954, with a Japanese astronomer. And note that something visible from Japan, the opposite side of the Earth from Pennsylvania, would have been BLOCKED from visibility by McC. The Earth is round. His claim is physically impossible, and he doesn't even realize it.



View Postpsyche101, on 08 March 2013 - 04:08 AM, said:

Good question Bee, in fact good enough to show you are too smart to fall for the stuff you make out that you believe in ;) I'd say you're onto something here, not so much with the time difference, but the relative position




LINK

Looks like they saw Ice reflecting. Bolding mine.


Cheers for that Psyche......so the Saheki and McClelland sightings of the what-ever on Mars... took place on different dates......mmmmmmmm


Did you realise that Jim?

And does this make that particular accusation that you have levelled at McClelland nul and void...?


Perhaps you should withdraw it...or people might think you are just trying to cast aspersions on McClelland because he is

spilling the beans.....the secret beans..... :)


.

Posted Image


#71    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,049 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 08 March 2013 - 02:41 PM

View Postpsyche101, on 08 March 2013 - 03:27 AM, said:

Gidday Mate

Yes I do, have a look at this (the website), and hen get back to me mate ;)

Cheers.

I had a look mate but wasnt able to ascertain whether he is

'making up on purpose and doesnt believe it' (your stance)

'believes what he is saying but is dellusional and basically very ill mentally' (Lillys stance)

'believes what he says...and some may well be true' (I guess my starting point :) )

what did you spot that makes you certain he knows he is bull***g and is basically a con artist>?


#72    JimOberg

JimOberg

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,832 posts
  • Joined:03 Sep 2007

Posted 08 March 2013 - 03:36 PM

View Postbee, on 08 March 2013 - 01:42 PM, said:

Cheers for that Psyche......so the Saheki and McClelland sightings of the what-ever on Mars... took place on different dates......mmmmmmmm


Did you realise that Jim?

And does this make that particular accusation that you have levelled at McClelland nul and void...?


Perhaps you should withdraw it...or people might think you are just trying to cast aspersions on McClelland because he is

spilling the beans.....the secret beans..... :)

Absolutely -- the dates are different. I had accepted McClelland's claim he saw the SAME event that the Japanese astronomer did. And clearly I had misinterpreted it to mean that he had seen the SAME event that the Japanese astronomer did.

Definitely need to look at this more closely, and dig out McClelland's original report with drawing -- `how can we obtain it?

Meanwhile, in light of the new reconstruction of events, it's clear that the impossibility of McClelland seeing the SAME event as the Japanese astronomer doesn't reflect badly on his credibility if he didn't claim to have seen the same event. But a different event at a different date.

Didn't he also claim that he and that Japanese astronomer were the ONLY two humans to have ever seen it? Or am I misinterpreting that, too?

Let's dig deeper and find out.

Bee, this is what reasonable people do when new evidence appears.

Please try it. yourself, once and awhile.

When the evidence comes out to support McClelland's claim that Hitler escaped to Antarctica and Nazis built UFOs there that buzzed the White House in 1952, I'd be happy to re-examine my mocking that idea, too. Richard Dolan seems to give credence to that theory, too.


#73    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,049 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 08 March 2013 - 03:46 PM

View PostJimOberg, on 08 March 2013 - 03:36 PM, said:

Absolutely -- the dates are different. I had accepted McClelland's claim he saw the SAME event that the Japanese astronomer did. And clearly I had misinterpreted it to mean that he had seen the SAME event that the Japanese astronomer did.

Definitely need to look at this more closely, and dig out McClelland's original report with drawing -- `how can we obtain it?

Meanwhile, in light of the new reconstruction of events, it's clear that the impossibility of McClelland seeing the SAME event as the Japanese astronomer doesn't reflect badly on his credibility if he didn't claim to have seen the same event. But a different event at a different date.



Bee, this is what reasonable people do when new evidence appears.


I applaud you for admitting the mistake Jim, but with this in mind, does this mean that we now have a reasonable appreciation of how you interpret events/evidence and therefore fall inline with Mitchells 'misinterpreting' the ESP conclusion?


#74    DONTEATUS

DONTEATUS

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 17,800 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Planet TEXAS

Posted 08 March 2013 - 03:47 PM

Yeah ! Waht Jim said ! "Hilter escaped to the Antartic built his UFO`s ate way too many Magic Beans climbed up the Magic bean stalk to the Moon and started a NEw Super Race up there,came back to earth on one of his many UFO`s to buzz the planet ,I.E. 1947 screwed up and crashed in New Mexico,they took his wrinkled little grey body to WPAFB,threw him into a Large pickle jar,and have been keeping it secret for 7 0 plus years now ?
Hum ? that sounds like a Movie in the makeing to me.
I better call in a few experts to verify this?
Bob lizzard,Hoologan`s,Dick Dolalots,the whole commiunty  of wack-in-bushes ! Might as weel get Our Old Geroge W.Bush for the Wack-n-Bush part !
See Y`az !justDONTEATUS :tu:

This is a Work in Progress!

#75    shaddow134

shaddow134

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,530 posts
  • Joined:25 Apr 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northern Ontario

  • "I have often regretted my speech, never my silence." - Xenocrates

Posted 08 March 2013 - 03:57 PM

View PostDONTEATUS, on 08 March 2013 - 03:47 PM, said:

Yeah ! Waht Jim said ! "Hilter escaped to the Antartic built his UFO`s ate way too many Magic Beans climbed up the Magic bean stalk to the Moon and started a NEw Super Race up there,came back to earth on one of his many UFO`s to buzz the planet ,I.E. 1947 screwed up and crashed in New Mexico,they took his wrinkled little grey body to WPAFB,threw him into a Large pickle jar,and have been keeping it secret for 7 0 plus years now ?
Hum ? that sounds like a Movie in the makeing to me.
I better call in a few experts to verify this?
Bob lizzard,Hoologan`s,Dick Dolalots,the whole commiunty  of wack-in-bushes ! Might as weel get Our Old Geroge W.Bush for the Wack-n-Bush part !
See Y`az !justDONTEATUS :tu:

Hitler didn't like magic beans,they gave him gas.The CIA kicked him off the Moon and he had to build  one on Mars instead.

Edited by shaddow134, 08 March 2013 - 03:59 PM.

"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia." - Charles Schulz




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users