ripped_fx Posted October 20, 2004 #1 Share Posted October 20, 2004 (edited) October 20th, 2004 (2 days after my 18th birthday ) is the 37th anniversary of the famed Patterson Bigfoot Footage. How do you think the Cryptozoological world would be if this film wouldn't have surfaced? Edited October 20, 2004 by ripped_fx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Rottweiler Posted October 20, 2004 #2 Share Posted October 20, 2004 Less interesting.The sasquatch would not be as believable without this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GCOW Posted October 20, 2004 #3 Share Posted October 20, 2004 to bad the patterson footage is a hoax.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Rottweiler Posted October 20, 2004 #4 Share Posted October 20, 2004 There is no proof of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GCOW Posted October 20, 2004 #5 Share Posted October 20, 2004 they posted a news report about it on the front page like 2 weeks ago! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_halo Posted October 21, 2004 #6 Share Posted October 21, 2004 i still think the face does look quite detailed when zoomed in, apparently someone who did the make up for the planets of the apes movie(the original of course) helped with the hoax.... happy birthday anyway though.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripped_fx Posted October 21, 2004 Author #7 Share Posted October 21, 2004 I really wont believe its a hoax unless the new guy who says he was "Patty" has undenyable proof, like a video or image of him in the suit from the day it was made, or a long lost confession by Patterson himself, neither of which do I believe I'll ever see. In any account, I believe there are Sasquatches in Bluff Creek, due to the footprints and Tom Slick sponsored expedites to Bluff Creek, and other "evidence" found before and after 1967. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justin Posted October 21, 2004 #8 Share Posted October 21, 2004 Thought I would add a good shot of the face, just to prove she is a real animal. NO ONE COULD FAKE THIS IN '67 Justin P.S. Happy belated birthday ripped fx Ah!!!! one more what the h#ll!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_halo Posted October 21, 2004 #9 Share Posted October 21, 2004 i reckon it would of been possible to fake.. but i hope its not fake... plus people could have altered the face in the photos and movies more recently to make it look more realistic... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talon Posted October 21, 2004 #10 Share Posted October 21, 2004 they posted a news report about it on the front page like 2 weeks ago! Read it again, the article was hammered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now