Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Australian documents - searchable PDF archive


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1    topsecretresearch

topsecretresearch

    Astral Projection

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 692 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 08 May 2013 - 12:15 AM

With the permission of the National Archives of Australia (on behalf of the Commonwealth Government of Australia), I've uploaded searchable PDF files containing over 10,000 pages of Australian UFO documents to a free file storage website.



Links to that archive, with some highlights from the collection, are given in my lengthy post at the link below:


http://www.abovetops...hread942661/pg1


All the files are sourced from the website of the National Archives of Australia. The website of the National Archives of Australia has images of many documents relating to UFOs. However, that website can be a bit slow and doesn’t allow the content of the UFO files to be browsed rapidly or searched. The PDF archive that I’ve uploaded should, therefore, make it easier and quicker to browse material as well as enabling the documents to be searched.



That lengthy post is split into the following sections:



SECTION A : THIS BRIEF INTRODUCTION



SECTION B : BACKGROUND - UFOS OVER OZ



SECTION C : USA “VERY INTERESTED” (1953)



SECTION D : SIGHTINGS BY “OUR HIGHLY TRAINED SELVES”


SECTION D1 : THE MEN FROM THE MINISTRY


SECTION D2 : THE SEA FURY / NOWRA INCIDENT (1954)


SECTION D3 : FLIGHT LIEUTENANT SCOTT’S SIGHTING (1952)



SECTION E : THE TURNER REPORT (1954)



SECTION F : MINISTER’S “PERSONAL” INVESTIGATION (1954)



SECTION G : SOME REPORTS “APPEAR TO BE INEXPLICABLE” (1957)



SECTION H : IT WASN’T VENUS (1971)



SECTION I : REVEREND GILL SIGHTINGS (1959)



SECTION J : THE VALENTICH DISAPPEARANCE (1978)



SECTION K : MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENTS



SECTION L : SCRIPT FOR DOWNLOADING



SECTION M : CONCLUSION



SECTION N : REFERENCES



SECTION O : POSTSCRIPT




I wonder how many members of the UFO community are familiar with the content of these documents, including:



(1) A report produced for the Australian government by the same Professor in Melbourne University’s Physics Department in 1954, which concluded that (if the intelligence reports in a book by Donald Keyhoe were authentic) “then the evidence presented is such that it is difficult to assume any interpretation other than that unidentified flying objects are being observed ... it is highly improbable that such objects have a terrestrial origin”.



(2) Criticisms of the Australian government statements on UFOs by a scientist that worked for the government (the same one that had earlier been the in Melbourne University’s Physics Department in 1954), which included noting that an identification list of all sightings made between 1960 and 1965 contained “15 identifications of Venus, not one of which is valid. In every case Venus was in a totally different part of the sky or not even above the horizon”. That scientist commented that “this off-hand unscientific attitude to identification did not escape the notice of the press or various scientists”.



(3) One government Minister (R G Casey) at one point considered some UFO reports “unexplained on any rational hypothesis”.



(4) A letter dated 1st April 1957 from the Director of Air Force Intelligence to the Director of the Joint Intelligence Bureau which states that many UFO reports “cover such mundane things as meteorological and astronomical phenomena” but went on to say “others appear to be inexplicable”.



(5) A letter from the US Embassy in Australia to the Australian Directorate of Air Force Intelligence stating “my headquarters is very interested in receiving reports of all unusual sightings not only in this area but all over the world”.



(6) The file devoted to one incident includes a document written by Captain Adams (the Director of Naval Intelligence) referring to the case as “a well authenticated sighting”.



I've said it before (please forgive my repeating myself...): I think that ufology could benefit considerably from making more underlying documentation easily available in a searchable format.



Read more:http://mutualufonetw...4#ixzz2SehkWTdB




#2    SwampgasBalloonBoy

SwampgasBalloonBoy

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 330 posts
  • Joined:02 Jul 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:1 Star State

Posted 08 May 2013 - 02:08 AM

Keep it coming, topsecreteresearch. This board would be pretty boring without all the info you're providing. Since The MacGuffin left, you've been filling the void nicely.


#3    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 31,500 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 08 May 2013 - 03:05 AM

View PostSwampgasBalloonBoy, on 08 May 2013 - 02:08 AM, said:

Keep it coming, topsecreteresearch. This board would be pretty boring without all the info you're providing. Since The MacGuffin left, you've been filling the void nicely.

Have you read the docs mate? It seems more like a soap than any sort of investigative information, as you know well, Gill was PNG, not Oz,  The Valentich case is no longer mysterious  they have even found wreckage from his plane, and some time ago, but that was kept quiet by the woo woo crowd, Woomera is a rocket testing ground, no surprises that UFO's are seen there, and Keith Basterfield seems to think every light in the sky is a starship. The Min Min phenomena is well known here, he seems to be describing that. I agree with Kudos for giving the information to the people, I just wish people would have a decent read of this stuff with a critical eye as opposed to an adoring one.
It's also quite strange reading that a fellow countryman wrote any of the above. I find as a rule of thumb, most Aussies are pretty well grounded, and not too many fall into the woo woo trap. But obviously, there is one in every crowd. I know Aussies see UFO,'s seen them myself, but of the people I speak to and grew up with are not as credulous as these threads make out and dive straight from UFO to ET In general we are a fairly level headed bunch.
I really do not find TSR and MacGuff to be on the same playing field myself, Q would have to be the best of the believer bunch I reckon, but MacG had a good repository right in his head which I always did respect. I find TSR to be a bit behind the times, no offence but as my sig says, I am not sure that such old and corrupted data can tell us a great deal.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#4    DONTEATUS

DONTEATUS

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 17,610 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Planet TEXAS

Posted 08 May 2013 - 03:23 AM

So ITs true ! theres Tales on both side of the Ponds ! Thats Good to Know,Like we didnt already ! Well Keep Looking Up ! :tu:

This is a Work in Progress!

#5    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,006 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 08 May 2013 - 08:39 AM

View Posttopsecretresearch, on 08 May 2013 - 12:15 AM, said:


(2) Criticisms of the Australian government statements on UFOs by a scientist that worked for the government (the same one that had earlier been the in Melbourne University’s Physics Department in 1954), which included noting that an identification list of all sightings made between 1960 and 1965 contained “15 identifications of Venus, not one of which is valid. In every case Venus was in a totally different part of the sky or not even above the horizon”. That scientist commented that “this off-hand unscientific attitude to identification did not escape the notice of the press or various scientists”.




thanks for posting TSR.

as for the bolded, this is quite interesting. I think this is interesting because how is it that two countries with the huge distance between them , USA and Australia......end up with the same (at least it appears to be) the same MO in as far as debunk the cases at all costs and if you are stuck use the joker AKA Venus.

The various Countries could never be in cahoots as far as a cover goes however its interesting similar methods seem to have been employed.


#6    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,006 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 08 May 2013 - 08:42 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 08 May 2013 - 03:05 AM, said:

Have you read the docs mate? It seems more like a soap than any sort of investigative information, as you know well, Gill was PNG, not Oz,  The Valentich case is no longer mysterious  they have even found wreckage from his plane, and some time ago, but that was kept quiet by the woo woo crowd, Woomera is a rocket testing ground, no surprises that UFO's are seen there, and Keith Basterfield seems to think every light in the sky is a starship. The Min Min phenomena is well known here, he seems to be describing that. I agree with Kudos for giving the information to the people, I just wish people would have a decent read of this stuff with a critical eye as opposed to an adoring one.
It's also quite strange reading that a fellow countryman wrote any of the above. I find as a rule of thumb, most Aussies are pretty well grounded, and not too many fall into the woo woo trap. But obviously, there is one in every crowd. I know Aussies see UFO,'s seen them myself, but of the people I speak to and grew up with are not as credulous as these threads make out and dive straight from UFO to ET In general we are a fairly level headed bunch.
I really do not find TSR and MacGuff to be on the same playing field myself, Q would have to be the best of the believer bunch I reckon, but MacG had a good repository right in his head which I always did respect. I find TSR to be a bit behind the times, no offence but as my sig says, I am not sure that such old and corrupted data can tell us a great deal.

Gidday Psyche, I have yet to read through teh documnets posted by TSR but maybe we can talk further once I have.

I have not heard of wreckage being found of Valentichs plane, have you a link or advice as to how I can look into this.....? thanks


oh and thanks for the kind words


#7    DONTEATUS

DONTEATUS

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 17,610 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Planet TEXAS

Posted 08 May 2013 - 03:52 PM

Well after a long lunch of Veggie-mite sandwhichs  Im seeing Tripple ! Clue me in on this one Psyche 101 !

This is a Work in Progress!

#8    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 31,500 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 08 May 2013 - 11:04 PM

View Postquillius, on 08 May 2013 - 08:42 AM, said:

Gidday Psyche, I have yet to read through teh documnets posted by TSR but maybe we can talk further once I have.

I have not heard of wreckage being found of Valentichs plane, have you a link or advice as to how I can look into this.....? thanks


oh and thanks for the kind words

Gidday Mate

It seems to be fairly old data that never amounted to much, the Australian Police UFO site seems much more current and up to date with modern information.
Always happy to accomodate.


Mr Basterfield and others had known the 315-page file - the holy grail in the mystery - existed. It had been seen by one researcher on the desk of a Transport Department official in 1982, as he lobbied him for its release. Since then, many have sought it doggedly to see which of the many theories on the mystery - hoax, suicide, staged disappearance, drug-induced hallucination or actual UFO sighting - was given credence by investigators.

What is significant about the file, Mr Basterfield argues, is that for the first time it is revealed that parts of aircraft wreckage with partial serial numbers were found in Bass Strait five years after the disappearance.

Mr Basterfield says Valentich's aircraft serial numbers fell within the range of those found on the wreckage, almost eliminating the theory that the pilot staged his disappearance on the way to King Island.

LINK


View PostDONTEATUS, on 08 May 2013 - 03:52 PM, said:

Well after a long lunch of Veggie-mite sandwhichs  Im seeing Tripple ! Clue me in on this one Psyche 101 !

You should visit right now, while you are immune to drop bears. Ingesting that much vegemite should keep them away for weeks.

I love the stuff on toast :D

Edited by psyche101, 08 May 2013 - 11:06 PM.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#9    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 31,500 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 08 May 2013 - 11:08 PM

View Postquillius, on 08 May 2013 - 08:39 AM, said:


thanks for posting TSR.

as for the bolded, this is quite interesting. I think this is interesting because how is it that two countries with the huge distance between them , USA and Australia......end up with the same (at least it appears to be) the same MO in as far as debunk the cases at all costs and if you are stuck use the joker AKA Venus.

The various Countries could never be in cahoots as far as a cover goes however its interesting similar methods seem to have been employed.


Do you not feel this furthers my personal conclusion that Quintanilla actually thought he was doing a god job as opposed to deliberate disinformation?

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#10    DONTEATUS

DONTEATUS

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 17,610 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Planet TEXAS

Posted 09 May 2013 - 03:01 AM

I had my my taste many years ago ,Its time to re-think the experience ! Now to Find the Stuff again !
Here veggiemite,here little veggiemite ! Now How do you Shoot a Veggiemite again? :gun:

This is a Work in Progress!

#11    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,006 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 09 May 2013 - 08:31 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 08 May 2013 - 11:04 PM, said:

Gidday Mate

It seems to be fairly old data that never amounted to much, the Australian Police UFO site seems much more current and up to date with modern information.
Always happy to accomodate.


Mr Basterfield and others had known the 315-page file - the holy grail in the mystery - existed. It had been seen by one researcher on the desk of a Transport Department official in 1982, as he lobbied him for its release. Since then, many have sought it doggedly to see which of the many theories on the mystery - hoax, suicide, staged disappearance, drug-induced hallucination or actual UFO sighting - was given credence by investigators.

What is significant about the file, Mr Basterfield argues, is that for the first time it is revealed that parts of aircraft wreckage with partial serial numbers were found in Bass Strait five years after the disappearance.

Mr Basterfield says Valentich's aircraft serial numbers fell within the range of those found on the wreckage, almost eliminating the theory that the pilot staged his disappearance on the way to King Island.

LINK


many thanks mate, will have a good read later when time permits.....

The Valentich encounter is still as interesting as it was before, I say this because he still had an encounter with a UFO....whether he crashed, was shot down or dissapeared altogether is irrelevant IMO. Establishing what the object was that he encountered is still priority and still leaves this case very open as far as a UFO encounter is concerned.

good link though will dig further to try and see just how big this range is and try and get a feel for just how likely some of the wreckage being his is.


#12    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,006 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 09 May 2013 - 08:35 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 08 May 2013 - 11:08 PM, said:

Do you not feel this furthers my personal conclusion that Quintanilla actually thought he was doing a god job as opposed to deliberate disinformation?


actually mate I took it the other way...it confirms that people in his position simply cannot make such an absurd suggestion especially when not investigating properly or even talking to those concerned. Which does indicate deliberate disinfo (or a debunk at all costs) or just plain stupid, and I dont buy someone becoming a Major being as stupid as he would have to be to believe he was doing a good job.

The 15 cases in teh Australian files suggest continued deliberate disinfo or again stupidity and as you say Australians are grounded people...no one can make the same mistake over and over again....

still amazes me how the same sentence or bit of evidence can be looked at in two opposite ways


#13    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 31,500 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 09 May 2013 - 09:15 AM

View Postquillius, on 09 May 2013 - 08:31 AM, said:

many thanks mate, will have a good read later when time permits.....

The Valentich encounter is still as interesting as it was before, I say this because he still had an encounter with a UFO....whether he crashed, was shot down or dissapeared altogether is irrelevant IMO. Establishing what the object was that he encountered is still priority and still leaves this case very open as far as a UFO encounter is concerned.

good link though will dig further to try and see just how big this range is and try and get a feel for just how likely some of the wreckage being his is.


Hrrmm, we have a strange recording, but it is only supposition that he saw a UFO. Many feel disorientation might have made him think he was seeing light sources from an angle he did not realise.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#14    psyche101

psyche101

    Conspiracy Realist

  • Member
  • 31,500 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 09 May 2013 - 09:18 AM

View Postquillius, on 09 May 2013 - 08:35 AM, said:

actually mate I took it the other way...it confirms that people in his position simply cannot make such an absurd suggestion especially when not investigating properly or even talking to those concerned. Which does indicate deliberate disinfo (or a debunk at all costs) or just plain stupid, and I dont buy someone becoming a Major being as stupid as he would have to be to believe he was doing a good job.

The 15 cases in teh Australian files suggest continued deliberate disinfo or again stupidity and as you say Australians are grounded people...no one can make the same mistake over and over again....

still amazes me how the same sentence or bit of evidence can be looked at in two opposite ways



What if it does not seem absurd to them though? For a staunch non woo woo type, it might seem perfectly reasonable to suggest Venus, and one could suppose that all UFO reports are bunkum, so in such a mindset, Venus would be more than likely, and a UFO just poppycock. For a hard military man, that does not seem an outrageous suggestion to me? There is certainly no collusion, so to get the same ideas of opposite sides of the globe to debunk, when it is not viable to any with a more liberal perspective, seems too limited in imagination to me.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#15    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,006 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 09 May 2013 - 09:32 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 09 May 2013 - 09:15 AM, said:

Hrrmm, we have a strange recording, but it is only supposition that he saw a UFO. Many feel disorientation might have made him think he was seeing light sources from an angle he did not realise.

I dont agree here Psyche. I dont think its supposition. Those that feel disorientation usually put this down to Hypoxia and the effects of. Remember he was only 3-4 thousand feet up, which makes it highly unlikely if not impossible to have been suffering due to altitude. We also have the fact that the recording does not indicate any symptoms of Hypoxia, instead he is still able to communicate with controller, even though the panic and shock of what he is seeing is apparent.

With regards to the UFO, he makes commenst such as these that suggest more than a light and in addition constant changing of angles, its ahead, below and above........so that throws the angle theory straight out.

''its a long shape''
''green light and
sort of metallic like it's all shiny on the outside'' (note the word 'and'...thsi tells us he could make out the lights PLUS the matallic shine)

the final thing he says is the most chilling, Valentich constantly asks and is asked if it is an aircraft to which there is uncertainty. He finally says :
'it is hovering and it's not an aircraft'
then transmission ends....I am guessing it came close enough for him to be certain it was no aircraft (even though previous manouveuring and speed meant this was unlikely)......





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users