Zoser derailing again with Darwin, a topic that should be discussed under palaeontology as it has nothing to do with the ET section nor even the OP, and if zoser or anyone else queries Darwins findings, well he did live over 200 years ago, you can say thats roughly the beginning of science, he had no-one to advise him, no reference books to help him along, and all the time he was being criticised...things like this hadnt happened yet:
"The spectacular fossilised skull of an ancient human ancestor that died nearly two million years ago in central Asia has forced scientists to rethink the story of early human evolution"
Now can we keep the topic on-track - or will you take your Darwinism problems to the above linked thread or other appropriate threads. Thankyou
He lost the debate concerning this subject in the other thread - and sorely, so he is trying to pretend it never existed, and is hoping to get it up and running again to see if he can stretch it a bit this time. The information he stated does not exist has been provided to him, he just wants some attention.
He wanted to know what happened between Erectus and Habilis, I said simple, Ergaster. As a rebuttal, he just repeated himself.
And he never stated whether Habilis was actually Homo or Australopithecine. He does not know what the heck he is talking about, he just lets his brain vomit straight onto his keyboard.