Actually, in the context of this conversation I think the only question is whether this is at all an analog to WTC. It wasn't hit by a plane and is a little over a third of the height in WTC in stories. Taking all of the evidence into account, it appears that sometimes fire alone causes steel structures to collapse and sometimes it doesn't. So? Why do only CTs cherry-pick from this fact and to make what argument exactly?
900 replies to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users