Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 8 votes

Atlantis is a reality find out where here


  • Please log in to reply
1732 replies to this topic

#1486    Dontlisten2me

Dontlisten2me

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 268 posts
  • Joined:04 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:09 AM

View Postcormac mac airt, on 11 December 2012 - 02:17 AM, said:

And yet you've admitted you haven't but apparently have no problems making it up as you go along. That's not research of any kind, that's a fabrication.

cormac

Well I just went off of yours and I said they would of had to of built over it. I think a long time ago. I can't prove it. Maybe they did before I would guess. Sometime. And your going to say no evidence exist. Ok. What do you say if we find something else like a civilization on a grander scale back in 7000 BC and no evidence existed before of it and it could be anywhere in the World? - Except word of mouth.

Edited by kampz, 11 December 2012 - 06:24 AM.


#1487    cormac mac airt

cormac mac airt

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 7,409 posts
  • Joined:18 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tennessee, USA

Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:37 AM

View Postkampz, on 11 December 2012 - 06:09 AM, said:

Well I just went off of yours and I said they would of had to of built over it. I think a long time ago. I can't prove it. Maybe they did before I would guess. Sometime. And your going to say no evidence exist. Ok. What do you say if we find something else like a civilization on a grander scale back in 7000 BC and no evidence existed before of it and it could be anywhere in the World? - Except word of mouth.

And how exactly would they have built over it if it sank into the ocean?

First of all one would have to show evidence of such having existed. In other words, find the evidence FIRST and then speculate.

Secondly, show evidence that it was an actual "civilization" versus a culture. And there are specific criteria for a civilization, so no, the two are NOT exactly the same thing.

cormac

The city and citizens, which you yesterday described to us in fiction, we will now transfer to the world of reality. It shall be the ancient city of Athens, and we will suppose that the citizens whom you imagined, were our veritable ancestors, of whom the priest spoke; they will perfectly harmonise, and there will be no inconsistency in saying that the citizens of your republic are these ancient Athenians. --  Plato's Timaeus

#1488    Dontlisten2me

Dontlisten2me

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 268 posts
  • Joined:04 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 11 December 2012 - 06:57 AM

View Postcormac mac airt, on 11 December 2012 - 06:37 AM, said:

And how exactly would they have built over it if it sank into the ocean?

First of all one would have to show evidence of such having existed. In other words, find the evidence FIRST and then speculate.

Secondly, show evidence that it was an actual "civilization" versus a culture. And there are specific criteria for a civilization, so no, the two are NOT exactly the same thing.

cormac

What if it dried up and Plato made a mistake? What if Plato made a mistake? If it sank into the ocean then the land under the island was sliced in half and sank like a boat kind of. Tsunamis and Hurricanes can flood and entire Island or most. Barbarians and Goths weren't much of a civilization yet Visigoths sacked Rome. I mentioned before all you need is a hand and a brain to accomplish what "Atlantis" did. Isn't word of mouth evidence? What if Atlantis was kinda like the Visigoths? Barbarians and Visigoths were more like a culture.

What do you say if we find something else like a civilization on a grander scale back in 7000 BC and no evidence existed before of it and it could be anywhere in the World? - The only evidence there is is word of mouth before discovery.

Edited by kampz, 11 December 2012 - 07:04 AM.


#1489    cormac mac airt

cormac mac airt

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 7,409 posts
  • Joined:18 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tennessee, USA

Posted 11 December 2012 - 07:09 AM

View Postkampz, on 11 December 2012 - 06:57 AM, said:

What if it dried up and Plato made a mistake? What if Plato made a mistake? If it sank into the ocean then the land under the island was sliced in half and sank like a boat kind of. Tsunamis and Hurricanes can flood and entire Island or most. Barbarians and Goths weren't much of a civilization yet Visigoths sacked Rome. I mentioned before all you need is a hand and a brain to accomplish what "Atlantis" did. Isn't word of mouth evidence? What if Atlantis was kinda like the Visigoths? Barbarians and Visigoths were more like a culture.

What do you say if we find something else like a civilization on a grander scale back in 7000 BC and no evidence existed before of it and it could be anywhere in the World? - The only evidence there is is word of mouth before discovery.

If such a place sank, it would leave evidence in the geological strata of the area involved. It doesn't just vanish into thin air. And as science has shown, there is no evidence for any such occurance in the area Atlantis was supposed to have been in. And no, word of mouth is not evidence. At best, it's hear-say.

To your second question. If there is no evidence for it to begin with, then there would also be no way of knowing about it either. So no "word of mouth".

cormac

The city and citizens, which you yesterday described to us in fiction, we will now transfer to the world of reality. It shall be the ancient city of Athens, and we will suppose that the citizens whom you imagined, were our veritable ancestors, of whom the priest spoke; they will perfectly harmonise, and there will be no inconsistency in saying that the citizens of your republic are these ancient Athenians. --  Plato's Timaeus

#1490    Dontlisten2me

Dontlisten2me

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 268 posts
  • Joined:04 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 11 December 2012 - 07:22 AM

The word of God and all religion is hear say. Even the entire theory of Evolution is hear say.

What do you mean by sank? The hurricane and tsunami way or slicing the land underneath it? Like I stated before, I think Platos take on the story is totally bogus to make Athens seem superior to everyone during the time he told the story again to Athens.

If "Atlantis" was similar to the Visigoths, it would make sense that there's barely anything to find. Maybe we did and/or built over it without knowing.

"To your second question. If there is no evidence for it to begin with, then there would also be no way of knowing about it either. So no "word of mouth".- Word of mouth is how a lot of things got discovered it would appear to me. That's how "Atlantis" became to exist as far as I can understand. Plus humans never leave the land usually once they're there. Unless forced too by Nature. It could of dried up or we've found something and don't realize.

It doesn't seem like "Atlantis" or the civilization resembling it existed for very long. Pretty coincidental that there city got wiped out real quick after raping and pillaging the Mediterranean and losing to Athens where Democracy was discovered. It does remind me a lot compared to the Visigoths.

Again I'm saying screw Platos story. Maybe we can find something resembling it that existed a good time before Plato was born. Take your pick on what a good time would be and there's your Atlantis. The question is how far can we go back? Maybe further then we already know and we need to discover it.

I would think you're right cormac.


Edited by kampz, 11 December 2012 - 07:52 AM.


#1491    scowl

scowl

    Government Agent

  • Closed
  • 4,111 posts
  • Joined:17 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:52 PM

View Postkampz, on 11 December 2012 - 07:22 AM, said:

The word of God and all religion is hear say. Even the entire theory of Evolution is hear say.

Please go to your nearest museum of natural history to see a small fraction of the physical evidence collected from all around the world that supports Evolution.


#1492    Dontlisten2me

Dontlisten2me

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 268 posts
  • Joined:04 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:47 AM

I did. I'm talking about everything regarding Evolution.

Edited by kampz, 12 December 2012 - 12:54 AM.


#1493    scowl

scowl

    Government Agent

  • Closed
  • 4,111 posts
  • Joined:17 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:56 AM

View Postkampz, on 12 December 2012 - 12:47 AM, said:

I did.
Good. You now know that Evolution is supported by physical evidence therefore it's not here say.


#1494    docyabut2

docyabut2

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 3,231 posts
  • Joined:12 Aug 2011

Posted 12 December 2012 - 01:54 AM

This is how they dwelt, being the guardians of their own citizens and the leaders of the Hellenes, who were their willing followers. And they took care to preserve the same number of men and women through all time, being so many as were required for warlike purposes, then as now-that is to say, about twenty thousand.

Critias

Question how early did Athens maintain a army of twenty thousand?


#1495    JesseCuster

JesseCuster

    Secret Jesus

  • Member
  • 2,933 posts
  • Joined:11 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 12 December 2012 - 03:56 AM

View Postkampz, on 11 December 2012 - 07:22 AM, said:

The word of God and all religion is hear say. Even the entire theory of Evolution is hear say.
No it's not.

The "entire theory of evolution" is an utterly amazing scientific theory backed up and supported by evidence from everything from evidence via paleontology, biology, genetics, comparative morphology, zoology, geology, etc.   The great thing about evolution (and just about all of modern science) is that all sorts of otherwise independent strands of science tie together to prove each other right and form a coherent worldview.  It's thanks to evolution and its related sciences, quantum physics and its contribution towards modern understanding of the solar system, geology, astronomy and its understanding of stellar evolution, etc, etc, etc. that leads towards our modern understanding of a 5 billion year old solar system and all the wonderful things that have happened since a gas cloud started gravitationally contracting and how physics, geology, quantum physics, chemistry, astronomy, evolution, etc. help us put all this stuff into a big picture that makes me in awe of modern science.

Modern science is accepted because.... it works.  Creationists, be they YECs, Old Earth Creationists, Old Earth Evolutionists, can't agree on anything (evolution, age of the world, decay rates of elements, etc.) because they're trying to hammer an old religious book into the real world when the Real World should be dictating their book and not vice versa.

Edited by Archimedes, 12 December 2012 - 03:57 AM.

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool." - Richard P. Feynman

#1496    kmt_sesh

kmt_sesh

    Telekinetic

  • 7,444 posts
  • Joined:08 Jul 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago, Illinois

Posted 12 December 2012 - 04:21 AM

View Postdocyabut2, on 12 December 2012 - 01:54 AM, said:

This is how they dwelt, being the guardians of their own citizens and the leaders of the Hellenes, who were their willing followers. And they took care to preserve the same number of men and women through all time, being so many as were required for warlike purposes, then as now-that is to say, about twenty thousand.

Critias

There was never a "leader" of the Hellenes, per se. What existed was a hegemon, in effect the superior military power at any one time. This was never a stable condition and tended to vacillate between Sparta, Athens, and Thebes. Once one city-state rose to power, other leading city-states grew wary and usually formed alliances to upset the hegemon. Then a new city-state would take the lead, and others would conspire against it...and on, and on, and on. The country we now now as Greece was never a nation-state in ancient times because the situation of the polis, or city-state, was the overarching defining characteristic in socio-politics.

As it was, Athens was never a key player among the other city-states until the onset of the Persian wars. It was due to failed Persian invasions that Athens emerged from backwater obscurity to great status.

Quote

Question how early did Athens maintain a army of twenty thousand?

It's quite possible Athens never reached an army of that size. We know when Darius I sent an invasion force to Greece in 490 BCE, Athens could field only around 9,000 men (they were joined by a small force of 1,000 Platean soldiers). I suppose it might have been possible during the early years of the Peloponnesian War, when around 200,000 people might have been living in Athens before the plague reduced it's population by around a quarter. But that's not a certainty, and the number would've included mercenaries in the Athenian army.

All of this is to say, in his dialogs Plato was presenting Athens as a great and influential power from very ancient times, which we know was not the case. Plato probably could not have known that, of course.

Posted Image
Words of wisdom from Richard Clopton:
For every credibility gap there is a gullibility fill.

Visit My Blog!

#1497    Dontlisten2me

Dontlisten2me

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 268 posts
  • Joined:04 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:11 AM

View Postscowl, on 12 December 2012 - 12:56 AM, said:

Good. You now know that Evolution is supported by physical evidence therefore it's not here say.

Yeah that's what they try to do.

Why's is there still debate about God? How come we haven't figured out how humans got here?

God theory is bulletproof. The Bible, Quran and others are worth reading still because they teach a lesson. God is however you want to take God in my opinion.

Evolution is a kevlar vest all shot up not worthy of wearing anymore. Then people put on a new one and it gets shot up again. Science and Evolution are different. We're using Science and shooting up the Evolution theory. We used Science to shoot up the Bible too. The guy probably should but shouldn't of died after the guy from the movie Predator unloaded a entire mini gun clip into him. Yeah Evolution is an invisible/cloaking monster(theory) taking trophies from millionaires and all sorts of people. "If it bleeds we can kill it" It's a zombie now in my opinion.

Some people say we were created for slavery to do nothing by Aliens. If your making humans make your own gold and there wasn't any evidence. In my opinion its slavery for entertainment. (Reasons why were here in my opinion - For entertainment, to invent things and for us to have life.

Then a lot of people say we stem from bigfoots AKA Evolution.(Just the 4 - 6 foot tall ones)

Then most of people claim God.

Remember the television show "Who Wants to be a Millionaire" and contestants had life lines? One was poll the audience. What if the question was how did Humans come to existence and the life line was poll the entire world. Most pick God. I know the question could never happen yet.

I don't want to argue about Evolution. I wanted to point out that it's not proven at all.

Edited by kampz, 12 December 2012 - 06:05 AM.


#1498    Dontlisten2me

Dontlisten2me

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 268 posts
  • Joined:04 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 12 December 2012 - 07:36 AM

To be truthful to those who complained - I believe in my opinion at least one part of the theory of evolution is correct. I already looked at it in school, media and friends like mostly everyone else. If you ask me why I might say Blue Footed Boobies. I don't know why I remember without looking back. Maybe the name. Micro evolution maybe at the smallest level possible. I don't know it seems like I'm typing about genetics. I'm being truthful. I couldn't take it anymore when reading/looking at it. Really. It was hard at school to take it seriously. I didn't get an A on everything.

We surely do resemble these hominids though. What's a hominid though? Bigfoot or a walking primate? It's like they slapped a brain on us and fixed some bones. Ancient Sumer sure had a great idea for there time. I'm staying away from Ancient Aliens though but not entirely.

- Something resembling Atlantis could be something south of Athens...to stick with the topic..maybe the Pillars of Hercules were two statues by Athens if you want to even use them in your story. Maybe that's why the Egyptians could of heard something about it. You can take conquering Western Europe and North Africa like Libya , Malta, Sicily and Italy resembling a Visigoth culture pillaging the Mediterranean or take the Visigoth idea out. I just find it funny out they got wiped out by "mother nature" after losing to Athens if you want to use that idea. They should probably have to face Athens somehow at some point if your taking the South of Athens idea. It's crap further west and (maybe) a power house in Egypt farther South. Egypt and maybe Persians to the East. I don't think they lasted very long either.

Edited by kampz, 12 December 2012 - 08:36 AM.


#1499    Dontlisten2me

Dontlisten2me

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 268 posts
  • Joined:04 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 12 December 2012 - 08:59 AM

The thing that concerns me is how did they get the man power to accomplish or even consider sacking/attacking Athens if you use that idea? Should I throw out the idea of having them invade Western Europe and North Africa? Should I say they just sacked them for profit and moved on? It would seem Crete or somewhere around there would be there Capitol. There Culture would appear to resemble a Pirate. It's compares to a Pirate Nation that really only has an Island or few under total control. I'm still trying to understand Malta.

Edited by kampz, 12 December 2012 - 09:14 AM.


#1500    Dontlisten2me

Dontlisten2me

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 268 posts
  • Joined:04 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:03 AM

If Malta was built during three distinct time periods why couldn't "Atlantis" been apart of one? Evidence of human activity started at 5000 BC. 5000 BC is closer to 9600 BC like Plato said."Atlantis" could of just conquered it too. Crete seems alright to though. I would think they were on both Islands.

Worthless post. Sorry

Edited by kampz, 12 December 2012 - 10:22 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users