No probs my friend, good to have you on board!
I cannot understand why though. As you say, you have a personal opinion, but logically, can the anthropomorphic argument be soundly refuted, nay challenged? With over 50 billion different shapes in our historical record, and only one shape achieving intelligence, and several times at that, I find a convincing argument. I tried for weeks to come up with an alternative plan with my very basic skills on Daz3D, but to no avail. Everything I designed that could lift, manipulate and design came up anthropomorphic. More is superfluous I find.
That's where I get on board with it.
And, I have never seen another design that is as efficient, in nature, or imagination. Which I admit I lack severely.
Edited by psyche101, 15 November 2012 - 06:33 AM.