Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 7 votes

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10148 replies to this topic

#8116    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010

Posted 04 March 2013 - 09:34 PM

Its hard to answer on all posts just one small correction to Onionmancer and co.
Copper cant cut a wood. Copper usage was for show. Hierarchy. Not for cuting stones.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#8117    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 04 March 2013 - 09:44 PM

View Postthe L, on 04 March 2013 - 09:34 PM, said:

Its hard to answer on all posts just one small correction to Onionmancer and co.
Copper cant cut a wood. Copper usage was for show. Hierarchy. Not for cuting stones.

Now you've done it.

I would run and hide if I were you.

Posted Image


#8118    Hazzard

Hazzard

    Stellar Black Hole

  • Member
  • 11,758 posts
  • Joined:25 Aug 2005

Posted 04 March 2013 - 09:44 PM

View Postzoser, on 04 March 2013 - 08:52 PM, said:

From Peru to the Middle East.  Zoser strikes again.

Game over boys.


No further comment required.



A link from were those pictures came from, perhaps?

I still await the compelling Exhibit A.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. -Edmund Burke

#8119    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 04 March 2013 - 09:47 PM

View PostHazzard, on 04 March 2013 - 09:44 PM, said:

A link from were those pictures came from, perhaps?

From Egypt, Peru, Bolivia, Turkey, Easter Island............

The technology and artefacts vary little.

Neither does the truth Haz.

Posted Image


#8120    scowl

scowl

    Government Agent

  • Closed
  • 4,111 posts
  • Joined:17 Nov 2010

Posted 04 March 2013 - 09:47 PM

View Postzoser, on 04 March 2013 - 08:57 PM, said:

Think it through.

That's Zoser realizing he said something provably wrong.

Expect a sudden topic change from him as he runs into a new corner.


#8121    Hazzard

Hazzard

    Stellar Black Hole

  • Member
  • 11,758 posts
  • Joined:25 Aug 2005

Posted 04 March 2013 - 09:48 PM

View Postzoser, on 04 March 2013 - 09:47 PM, said:

From Egypt, Peru, Bolivia, Turkey, Easter Island............

The technology and artefacts vary little.

Neither does the truth Haz.

I meant the link from where you got the pictures.

I still await the compelling Exhibit A.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. -Edmund Burke

#8122    S2F

S2F

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 7,076 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008

Posted 04 March 2013 - 09:52 PM

View Postthe L, on 04 March 2013 - 09:34 PM, said:

Its hard to answer on all posts just one small correction to Onionmancer and co.
Copper cant cut a wood. Copper usage was for show. Hierarchy. Not for cuting stones.

Except in this case it is the sand abrasive doing the cutting and not the copper itself. The copper just facilitates the process.

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#8123    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010

Posted 04 March 2013 - 09:52 PM

View Postzoser, on 04 March 2013 - 09:44 PM, said:

Now you've done it.

I would run and hide if I were you.

Its hard core history facts. Truth defends me.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#8124    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010

Posted 04 March 2013 - 09:53 PM

View PostSlave2Fate, on 04 March 2013 - 09:52 PM, said:

Except in this case it is the sand abrasive doing the cutting and not the copper itself. The copper just facilitates the process.

Why would they if they have had iron? :w00t:

Copper cuts stones-Its just one of set up theories. Working hypothesis. From where people who trust in it start to search archaeological evidence for such.
Copper was not tool. It was accesories. Decoration. For show. Like gold. It was among first metals that we use because of softness.

Try cut granite with Au...

Edited by the L, 04 March 2013 - 09:58 PM.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#8125    S2F

S2F

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 7,076 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008

Posted 04 March 2013 - 09:56 PM

View Postthe L, on 04 March 2013 - 09:53 PM, said:

Why would they if they have had iron? :w00t:

Who had iron? The Inca? The Ancient Egyptians?

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#8126    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010

Posted 04 March 2013 - 09:59 PM

View PostSlave2Fate, on 04 March 2013 - 09:56 PM, said:

Who had iron? The Inca? The Ancient Egyptians?

Yup. And Aztecs, Eskimos, Sumerians ...and it came from the sky. ;)

Edited by the L, 04 March 2013 - 10:05 PM.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#8127    S2F

S2F

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 7,076 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008

Posted 04 March 2013 - 10:14 PM

View Postthe L, on 04 March 2013 - 09:59 PM, said:

Yup. And Aztecs, Eskimos, Sumerians ...and it came from the sky. ;)

If anything, meteoric iron was more for showing status than copper to ancient civilizations. Any iron they would have gotten from meteors would not nearly have been enough to supply a workforce to build a megalithic monument. It's rarity and place of origin (the heavens) would have elevated it far above copper as a status symbol.

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#8128    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010

Posted 04 March 2013 - 10:21 PM

No. It depends on how huge was it when it falls. When Cortes met Aztecs some of common soldiers have had daggers knives. So he asked them from where you got it? They pointed out in stars, Also many historians agree that meteoric iron was commonly used among Eskimos.

Because if wasnt meteoric iron then Zoser was right. Copper couldnt do it.
How can you explain fine work in granite with copper? You cant. Unless they have had something else.

Also many things were done with stone tools. And for fine work they probably used meteoric iron.

Edited by the L, 04 March 2013 - 10:21 PM.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#8129    S2F

S2F

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 7,076 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008

Posted 04 March 2013 - 10:25 PM

View Postthe L, on 04 March 2013 - 10:21 PM, said:

No. It depends on how huge was it when it falls. When Cortes met Aztecs some of common soldiers have had daggers knives. So he asked them from where you got it? They pointed out in stars, Also many historians agree that meteoric iron was commonly used among Eskimos.

Because if wasnt meteoric iron then Zoser was right. Copper couldnt do it.
How can you explain fine work in granite with copper? You cant. Unless they have had something else.

Also many things were done with stone tools. And for fine work they probably used meteoric iron.

Bronze most likely. It seems everybody forgets that the Inca had bronze tools as well.

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#8130    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010

Posted 04 March 2013 - 10:29 PM

View PostSlave2Fate, on 04 March 2013 - 10:25 PM, said:

Bronze most likely. It seems everybody forgets that the Inca had bronze tools as well.

Bronze cant deal with granite, diorite... Stone tools were most efficent till Iron age.
If I had to choose one axe among three axes to cut a tree, bronze, copper and stone axe, I would choose stone.

Edited by the L, 04 March 2013 - 10:34 PM.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."