Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

DHS-Funded Drone Spies On Private Gun Sale


  • Please log in to reply
120 replies to this topic

#1    OverSword

OverSword

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 12,242 posts
  • Joined:16 Oct 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle WA USA

  • When the power of love overcomes the love of power then humanity can evolve

Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:34 PM

From the article:

The promotional video for a surveillance drone now being purchased by law enforcement bodies across the country with the aid of DHS funding shows a UAV spying on a private gun sale, falsely depicting the scenario as a criminal activity.

It is important to emphasize that private firearms sales without background checks are not illegal under current law in the United States, although gun control advocates are feverishly trying to change that with new legislation. The government claims that 40 per cent of all gun sales are conducted without background checks.


More propaganda war against citizens by government agencies, depicting law abaiding citizens as terrorists and criminals IMO.


http://www.infowars....ivate-gun-sale/




#2    Drayno

Drayno

    Reverend Dudemeister

  • Member
  • 3,675 posts
  • Joined:18 Jan 2008
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:11 AM

View PostOverSword, on 25 February 2013 - 10:34 PM, said:

From the article:

The promotional video for a surveillance drone now being purchased by law enforcement bodies across the country with the aid of DHS funding shows a UAV spying on a private gun sale, falsely depicting the scenario as a criminal activity.

It is important to emphasize that private firearms sales without background checks are not illegal under current law in the United States, although gun control advocates are feverishly trying to change that with new legislation. The government claims that 40 per cent of all gun sales are conducted without background checks.

More propaganda war against citizens by government agencies, depicting law abaiding citizens as terrorists and criminals IMO.

http://www.infowars....ivate-gun-sale/

The DHS is a joke.

"One leader, one people, signifies one master and millions of slaves." - Camus

#3    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:21 AM

First American shoots one of them down or hacks it down is going to be a Folkhero.


#4    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 26 February 2013 - 03:33 AM




#5    MichaelW

MichaelW

    Poltergeist

  • Banned
  • 2,523 posts
  • Joined:14 Nov 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nelson, New Zealand

  • Doctors are sadists who like to play God and watch lesser people scream.

Posted 26 February 2013 - 04:48 AM

View PostEonwe, on 26 February 2013 - 12:11 AM, said:

The DHS is a joke.

This thread is a joke and anyone that believes anything on Infowars is a clown.

Signature removed - please see rule 3b.

#6    DieChecker

DieChecker

    I'm a Rogue Scholar

  • Member
  • 16,680 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, Oregon, USA

  • Hey, I'm not wrong. I'm just not completely right.

Posted 26 February 2013 - 05:20 AM

View PostOverSword, on 25 February 2013 - 10:34 PM, said:

The promotional video for a surveillance drone now being purchased by law enforcement bodies across the country with the aid of DHS funding shows a UAV spying on a private gun sale, falsely depicting the scenario as a criminal activity.

Cool UAV. I look forward to them being used to avert/prevent/fight crime.

This video looks Super Staged. What is the range on this little helicopter? Or, did it just happen to be hovering over a empty abandoned field and fortuitously filmed two guys selling each other guns? Just the actions of these guys would be enough to provide cause to see what they were up to. If they did nothing wrong, then nothing happens. No crime, no time.

I'd rather that the Law followed two legally selling guys and watched them, then that even one in a hundred which was arming terrorists went down. The loss of privacy is a price I am willing to pay.... Just my own personnal opinon. If two guys want to sell guns to each other, perhaps they should meet at a gun store, or a private residence??

Edited by DieChecker, 26 February 2013 - 05:21 AM.

Here at Intel we make processors on 12 inch wafers. And, the individual processors on the wafers are called die. And, I am employed to check these die. That is why I am the DieChecker.

At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid. - Friedrich Nietzsche

Qualifications? This is cryptozoology, dammit! All that is required is the spirit of adventure. - Night Walker

#7    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 26 February 2013 - 05:38 AM

Ill be looking for the amateur porn from your window as well. Dont think DHS is the only one spying these days. Throw your Rights away. But if you think thats what they will be used for..I...Your falling for it. In a bad way.


#8    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    Is not a number!

  • Member
  • 9,651 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queensland, Australia.

Posted 26 February 2013 - 07:57 AM

View PostAsteroidX, on 26 February 2013 - 12:21 AM, said:

First American shoots one of them down or hacks it down is going to be a Folkhero.
Before or after they wake up in Gitmo as a "Domestic Terrorist"?


#9    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 26 February 2013 - 08:00 AM

No need for the commie rhetoric here. You guys were happy giving up your guns and selling your resources to China. Perhaps worrying about your own country would suit you better.


#10    MichaelW

MichaelW

    Poltergeist

  • Banned
  • 2,523 posts
  • Joined:14 Nov 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nelson, New Zealand

  • Doctors are sadists who like to play God and watch lesser people scream.

Posted 26 February 2013 - 08:20 AM

View PostAsteroidX, on 26 February 2013 - 05:38 AM, said:

Ill be looking for the amateur porn from your window as well. Dont think DHS is the only one spying these days. Throw your Rights away. But if you think thats what they will be used for..I...Your falling for it. In a bad way.

Well then, give us uneducated indoctrinated, freedom hating masses an enlightened perspective on what drones are used for.

Signature removed - please see rule 3b.

#11    hatecraft

hatecraft

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 96 posts
  • Joined:14 Feb 2012

Posted 26 February 2013 - 02:20 PM

View PostDieChecker, on 26 February 2013 - 05:20 AM, said:




I'd rather that the Law followed two legally selling guys and watched them, then that even one in a hundred which was arming terrorists went down. The loss of privacy is a price I am willing to pay.... Just my own personnal opinon. If two guys want to sell guns to each other, perhaps they should meet at a gun store, or a private residence??

I guess you'd be ok with having a drone follow you around all day then?  I mean, you might break some sort of law so the feds will just keep a constant eye on you just in case.


#12    Babe Ruth

Babe Ruth

    Non-Corporeal Being

  • Member
  • 8,116 posts
  • Joined:23 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:27North 80West

Posted 26 February 2013 - 02:35 PM

...arming terrorists.  ROFLMAO

The real terrorists in this country are already armed, and most of them hold public office.


#13    aztek

aztek

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 5,288 posts
  • Joined:12 Nov 2006

Posted 26 February 2013 - 02:52 PM

the gvmnt has no idea how many % make up private sales, they just make up the number. there are no records of private sales.

there is no way to know if person A decided to sell his gun to person B and drove to his house to do the buissnes, how will dhs know person A has intention to sell his  gun to anyone, when it will happen, and were, so they can send a drone there.

i don't belive this is physicly possible, the article is a B.S.

this looks like another reporter's "make good stuff up" to get hits on the website.

they really should use those drones to enforce "pick up after your dog" law, there is so much sh..t in nyc alone, from dog owners that don't pick up. nyc has $250 fine for that, the drones can  pay for themselves in a month if used to get these as...les. there are litterealy millions in dog sh...t on the streets of nyc.

RESIDENT TROLL.

#14    rashore

rashore

    Telekinetic

  • 6,665 posts
  • Joined:26 Feb 2010
  • Gender:Female

Posted 26 February 2013 - 02:59 PM

Well that was funny and very staged... And really silly. I mean, come on, how many illegal people trade off guns in that way?
The implications aren't very funny though :(


#15    Stellar

Stellar

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 14,800 posts
  • Joined:27 Apr 2004
  • Gender:Male

  • The objective of war is not to die for your country. It's to make the other son of a b**** die for his!
    -Patton

Posted 26 February 2013 - 03:39 PM

Asteroid: you should have no problem with this, given your stance on privacy that you expressed when I wouldnt tell you what country I'm from.

Don't you consider "driving into the middle of nowhere" at least as "dishonest" as someone not giving you private information, and therefore a potential "threat", and so infringing on their privacy is ok by you?

"I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent."

----Seraphina




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users