Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 7 votes

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10148 replies to this topic

#5281    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 18 January 2013 - 06:53 PM

Look you guys; all the protesting, gnashing of teeth and complaining is not going to make a jot of difference to how this was done.

Hasina is busy making flip comments without performing one minute of research, Abe is posting blocks put together with mortar, Mr O is claiming that Protzen led a crack team of sculptors and replicated Sacsayahuaman with a 0.5 tonne demonstration full of gaps and nearly injuring a team in the process (eight men dropped a 0.5 tonne block).

Abe is claiming super hard tools capable of shaping andesite yet has not provided a shred of proof, and neither could his colonial witnesses who allegedly saw these constructions.

Slave, WoH, Myles, Harte, Badeskov, Psyche and everyone else just pop in occasionally and scream "show me the aliens or I'll never believe you"

What am I to think of you lot?


On the other hand I have posted scores of images of skulls, vitrified stone, moulded stone, softened outcrops, precision work and reports, and I have set out how this was done.

No I don't know the builders names, and I don't know exactly what tools they used but the principles are clear.

Nothing has been submitted today that convinces me otherwise.

View PostAbramelin, on 18 January 2013 - 06:41 PM, said:

A lot larger, yes.

But not polygonal, and not any sign of 'vitrification'.

So you see mortar? Where?

In your picture there is mortar.  The Coricancha blocks are vitrified by the way.

Posted Image


#5282    Harte

Harte

    Supremely Educated Knower of Everything in Existence

  • Member
  • 9,145 posts
  • Joined:06 Aug 2006

Posted 18 January 2013 - 06:56 PM

View PostTheOtherSide1945, on 17 January 2013 - 10:24 PM, said:

ok i concede. ancient man could have done everything. if so, they had advanced knowledge of engineering. they also had advanced knowledge of astronomy.
Please point out what you mean by "advanced knowledge of engineering" here. Also for the advanced knowledge of Astronomy part.

View PostTheOtherSide1945, on 17 January 2013 - 10:24 PM, said:

why then, are they making monuments and worshipping false gods that come from the stars?
Please point out any verifiable ancient claims that gods came from the stars.

View PostTheOtherSide1945, on 17 January 2013 - 10:24 PM, said:

why are the ancient Sumerians talking about gods using machines to alter genetics?
No such statements were ever recorded by the Sumerians.

View PostTheOtherSide1945, on 17 January 2013 - 10:24 PM, said:

if they are were so smart they should know that there werent gods that came from the sky. why are they making these giant structures to worship "gods?"

Please show us where "they" (meaning, I suppose, ancient civilizations/cultures) claimed their gods came from the sky.

View PostTheOtherSide1945, on 17 January 2013 - 10:24 PM, said:

why are they obsessed about kings being from the same blood as gods that came from the sky?

Please spend a moment's cogitation on this particular question.  If you can't come up with the answer, then walk away and come back when you are grown.  The question itself reeks of naivete.

Harte

I've consulted all the sages I could find in yellow pages but there aren't many of them. - The Alan Parsons Project
Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do so. - Bertrand Russell
Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong. - Thomas Jefferson
Giorgio's dying Ancient Aliens internet forum

#5283    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 18 January 2013 - 06:57 PM

View PostAbramelin, on 18 January 2013 - 06:45 PM, said:

Yes:

Posted Image

Posted Image

"Please notice: A stone block split off with this method breaks cleanly and regularly and needs very little additional work."

http://www.cheops-py...utting.html#top


.

That's not going to work Abe because in my picture in post 5281 there is no access to the ends of the extraction.

Further more how do you account for the fact that the remaining stone is highly smooth and finished?

That is without this explanation:

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image


#5284    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 18 January 2013 - 07:00 PM

View PostAbramelin, on 18 January 2013 - 06:45 PM, said:

Yes:

Posted Image



"Please notice: A stone block split off with this method breaks cleanly and regularly and needs very little additional work."

http://www.cheops-py...utting.html#top


.

The killer of your theory Abe is that the remaining stone is perfectly finished.  Again your theory matches not the evidence.

Stubborness and persistence is not enough.  I admire you though but in the end it won't be enough.


Off to watch AA in a minute.

I've watched 580 of Foerster's 613 video clips now!

Posted Image


#5285    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,110 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 18 January 2013 - 07:06 PM

View Postzoser, on 18 January 2013 - 06:53 PM, said:

Look you guys; all the protesting, gnashing of teeth and complaining is not going to make a jot of difference to how this was done.

Hasina is busy making flip comments without performing one minute of research, Abe is posting blocks put together with mortar, Mr O is claiming that Protzen led a crack team of sculptors and replicated Sacsayahuaman with a 0.5 tonne demonstration full of gaps and nearly injuring a team in the process (eight men dropped a 0.5 tonne block).

Abe is claiming super hard tools capable of shaping andesite yet has not provided a shred of proof, and neither could his colonial witnesses who allegedly saw these constructions.

Slave, WoH, Myles, Harte, Badeskov, Psyche and everyone else just pop in occasionally and scream "show me the aliens or I'll never believe you"

What am I to think of you lot?


On the other hand I have posted scores of images of skulls, vitrified stone, moulded stone, softened outcrops, precision work and reports, and I have set out how this was done.

No I don't know the builders names, and I don't know exactly what tools they used but the principles are clear.

Nothing has been submitted today that convinces me otherwise.



In your picture there is mortar.  The Coricancha blocks are vitrified by the way.

-1- Show me the mortar.

-2- I never mentioned 'super hard tools', I have mentioned hardened bronze. In case you didn't know (but I posted about it), their bronze was of a different composition from what the ancient Egyptians used.

-3- You say I haven't posted a shred of proof. But you haven't posted anything near a shadow of proof. I have posted sane ideas and theories, you keep going on about vitrification/molding, but all you post is photos.

I have posted about what chroniclers reported, and what modern people encountered in the jungle.

-4- You did indeed post many images of skulls. And I had an answer to all of them.

-5- You need to check your memory.

-6- I start thinking what Lord V said: that you work for some of tourist agency.


#5286    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,110 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 18 January 2013 - 07:09 PM

View Postzoser, on 18 January 2013 - 07:00 PM, said:

The killer of your theory Abe is that the remaining stone is perfectly finished.  Again your theory matches not the evidence.

Stubborness and persistence is not enough.  I admire you though but in the end it won't be enough.


Off to watch AA in a minute.

I've watched 580 of Foerster's 613 video clips now!

Did Foerster see another giant human face in some cliff?

-

The remaining stone may be perfectly finished, but cutting molten rock won't explain it, however much you repeat it.

If the rock was molten and then cut out with something sharp , the corners would also be sharp.
They are not.


.

Edited by Abramelin, 18 January 2013 - 07:15 PM.


#5287    Valdemar the Great

Valdemar the Great

    Mainly Spherical in Shape

  • Member
  • 25,087 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005

Posted 18 January 2013 - 07:17 PM

View Postzoser, on 18 January 2013 - 06:53 PM, said:

Look you guys; all the protesting, gnashing of teeth and complaining is not going to make a jot of difference to how this was done.

On the other hand I have posted scores of images of skulls, vitrified stone, moulded stone, softened outcrops, precision work and reports, and I have set out how this was done.


I think the problem is that you're coming from the "what else could it possibly have been" argument; you're adamant that Humans, certainly Stone age Incas, could not possibly have done all the wondrous things that we see. But that still doesn't prove that ETs did do it; "what else could it possibly have been" doesn't prove that ETs did visit, or stay for a while, and do all these wondrous, but fairly pointless things. They seemed to leave no corroborative evidence of their beeing here at all, apart from Walls. Unless that's what you're trying to argue with the elongated Skulls; are we trying to say that these are skulls of ETs, or that elnogating the skulls of Humans was another of the fairly pointless things they did? Could it not have been some other, long-lost race from Earth that built these structures, if the Incas couldn't possibly have done it? The Atlanteans, perhaps? Lemurians? Utopians? :unsure2:

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


:cat:


#5288    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 10,234 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012

Posted 18 January 2013 - 07:18 PM

View Postzoser, on 18 January 2013 - 06:36 PM, said:

Some of the skulls have 2.5 times the volume.  Does binding explain that?  Does it explain larger eye sockets, jaw, molar and cranial plate differences?

Research recommended

You do the least research of any poster Ive read.. youre research, as you put it, is watching AA videos and their kind and thinking.."well if the guy on the movie says its not possible, then it isnt, so I will share that at UM"

So why is the style of building with polygon blocks found in the Mediterranean as well?  And which of all the sites with polygons is oldest?

and for any newcomers to this thread, the skulls were debunked about the 160 page mark, not only do we have LIVING cone-heads, but we have historical 'factual' evidence, plus we have a recognized birth disorder that even today cause babies to be BORN with elongated skulls. In fact google baby coneheads and you will find right now, hundreds of worried mums discussing their babies mis-shapen heads, and also discussing head molds that the child must wear to try counteract the effect..its VERY COMMON, tho nowadays we treat it, thanks to medical understanding

see an MD created vid...you know, a highly professional well trained expert




But thats not saying I want to discuss all that again. Thats just for newcomers benefit.

You see zosers man on the vid, says 'look at these stairs carved in rock'...they're impossible to achieve.. and why has that man made over 600 vids, while at the same time promising his sheeple, sorry followers, that in time he will have dna results?

600 plus vids? He's on a mission isn't he, (Please donate to Paypal to help me keep holidaying, er I mean researching in Peru)

this thread just goes round and round and round...

Edited by seeder, 18 January 2013 - 07:34 PM.

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

"The tragedy of life is not that it ends so soon, but that we wait so long to begin it"

#5289    Harte

Harte

    Supremely Educated Knower of Everything in Existence

  • Member
  • 9,145 posts
  • Joined:06 Aug 2006

Posted 18 January 2013 - 07:20 PM

View Postzoser, on 18 January 2013 - 06:53 PM, said:

In your picture there is mortar.  The Coricancha blocks are vitrified by the way.

Just like everything else you look at.

Harte

View PostAbramelin, on 18 January 2013 - 11:19 AM, said:

But don't you think it's somewhat odd that the AA is all over the megalithic stones in Peru, but never said a word about what I told and showed you about the Romans?

No one ever mentioned 'aliens' when trying to explain how the Romans brought these huge pillars from Egypt to Rome.
The Romans were white.

Harte

I've consulted all the sages I could find in yellow pages but there aren't many of them. - The Alan Parsons Project
Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do so. - Bertrand Russell
Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong. - Thomas Jefferson
Giorgio's dying Ancient Aliens internet forum

#5290    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,110 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 18 January 2013 - 07:21 PM

Where is the mortar?

Click to enlarge:

Attached File  Inca_Cuzco_NO_mortar.jpg   36.04K   10 downloads

To be clear: there is NO mortar between these stones.

Why would they carve these jigsaw stones, and then add mortar? They could have used simple baked bricks, stacked them on top of each other with mortar, and be done with it.

But they didn't.

.

Edited by Abramelin, 18 January 2013 - 07:54 PM.


#5291    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 10,234 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012

Posted 18 January 2013 - 07:28 PM

View Postzoser, on 18 January 2013 - 06:53 PM, said:



On the other hand I have posted scores of images of skulls, vitrified stone, moulded stone, softened outcrops, precision work and reports, and I have set out how this was done.



No zoser, you copy and paste text and incessantly watch 'biased' vids to get your notions, everyone else on the other hand has bombarded you with a shedload of real research to counter every single claim you have made,

and when the going gets tough, oh lets switch to skulls seeing as there are some newbies to the discussion


you do no research, you do not question anything other than what is presented in your vids..

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

"The tragedy of life is not that it ends so soon, but that we wait so long to begin it"

#5292    wolfknight

wolfknight

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,658 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007

Posted 18 January 2013 - 07:28 PM

It is all still a Theory. According to theory the F4 Phanton would fly. Fact is you stap wings on a brick and big enough engine on it and it will fly. That is Fact. AA is full of BS


#5293    seeder

seeder

    Nut Cracker

  • Member
  • 10,234 posts
  • Joined:21 Nov 2012

Posted 18 January 2013 - 07:40 PM

View Postzoser, on 18 January 2013 - 07:00 PM, said:



I've watched 580 of Foerster's 613 video clips now!

while Ive actually lived my life, went snowboarding, work, socialized, got drunk, paid attention to world news...

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me... It's all the rabbit poop you stumble over on your way down...
“It's easier to fool people - than to convince them that they have been fooled.”  Mark Twain

"The tragedy of life is not that it ends so soon, but that we wait so long to begin it"

#5294    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,110 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 18 January 2013 - 07:50 PM

View Postseeder, on 18 January 2013 - 07:40 PM, said:

while Ive actually lived my life, went snowboarding, work, socialized, got drunk, paid attention to world news...

And then still you had time to search for actual information, not merely watch video clips from your favorite guru.


#5295    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,110 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 18 January 2013 - 08:01 PM

View PostHarte, on 18 January 2013 - 07:20 PM, said:


The Romans were white.

Harte

I don't like to bring a 'racial thing' into this, but I am slowly but surely getting convinced that the AA believers don't think much of these 'injuns'.

Most probably because they have never met them in real life.

The ones I met in Peru and Bolivia were tough and strong people, both women and men.

I can easily imagine thousands of them sweating and toiling to pull a huge boulder along.