Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 7 votes

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10148 replies to this topic

#3781    Admiral Rhubarb

Admiral Rhubarb

    Often Unsatisfactory

  • Member
  • 23,498 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005

Posted 01 January 2013 - 10:41 AM

View PostSlave2Fate, on 01 January 2013 - 10:34 AM, said:

Is that you 747?
:st

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


Posted Image


#3782    Slave2Fate

Slave2Fate

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 6,414 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008

Posted 01 January 2013 - 10:44 AM

View PostLord Vetinari, on 01 January 2013 - 10:41 AM, said:

:st

I thought so, it's going to seem a little odd seeing you with a different moniker after all these years as 747400. ^_^

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#3783    bmk1245

bmk1245

    puny village idiot

  • Member
  • 3,947 posts
  • Joined:16 Aug 2006

Posted 01 January 2013 - 10:51 AM

View PostSlave2Fate, on 01 January 2013 - 10:44 AM, said:

I thought so, it's going to seem a little odd seeing you with a different moniker after all these years as 747400. ^_^
Yeap. Frequent avatar changes were confusing enough, now this... Must be alienz at work...

Arguing with fool is like playing chess with pigeon: he will scatter pieces, peck King's crown, crap on bishop, and fly away bragging how he won the game... (heard once, author unknown).
Zhoom! What was that? That was your life, Mate! Oh, that was quick. Do I get another? Sorry, Mate. That's your lot. Basil Fawlty (John Cleese).

#3784    Slave2Fate

Slave2Fate

    Bloodstained Hurricane

  • Member
  • 6,414 posts
  • Joined:22 May 2008

Posted 01 January 2013 - 10:56 AM

View Postbmk1245, on 01 January 2013 - 10:51 AM, said:

Yeap. Frequent avatar changes were confusing enough, now this... Must be alienz at work...

:lol:

I've thought of changing my name as well as my avatar before but they've become who I am now, at UM at least. It would almost be like changing my real name and face. :D

"You want to discuss plausibility then you have to accept reality." -Mattshark

"Don't argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience." -Obviousman

You know... the plural of ``anecdote'' is not ``data''. Similarly, the plural of ``random fact'' is not ``mystical symbolism''. -sepulchrave


#3785    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,097 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011

Posted 01 January 2013 - 10:57 AM

View Postbmk1245, on 01 January 2013 - 10:51 AM, said:

Yeap. Frequent avatar changes were confusing enough, now this... Must be alienz at work...

its a conspiracy man.. government cover up of the facts about who 747 really is..

or it could just be vitrification between his name and his avatar changes..


#3786    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    Is not a number!

  • Member
  • 9,454 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008

Posted 01 January 2013 - 11:06 AM

Maybe for 2013, given we've all survived the end of the world, we shoudl all get new names?


#3787    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 01 January 2013 - 11:13 AM

View PostLord Vetinari, on 01 January 2013 - 10:41 AM, said:

:st

I had my suspicions but I didn't realise that the ID could be changed!

Posted Image


#3788    bmk1245

bmk1245

    puny village idiot

  • Member
  • 3,947 posts
  • Joined:16 Aug 2006

Posted 01 January 2013 - 11:16 AM

View PostSlave2Fate, on 01 January 2013 - 10:56 AM, said:

:lol:

I've thought of changing my name as well as my avatar before but they've become who I am now, at UM at least. It would almost be like changing my real name and face. :D
:tu:

Same here.

Arguing with fool is like playing chess with pigeon: he will scatter pieces, peck King's crown, crap on bishop, and fly away bragging how he won the game... (heard once, author unknown).
Zhoom! What was that? That was your life, Mate! Oh, that was quick. Do I get another? Sorry, Mate. That's your lot. Basil Fawlty (John Cleese).

#3789    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 01 January 2013 - 11:16 AM

View PostSlave2Fate, on 01 January 2013 - 10:37 AM, said:

I want to wish everyone a happy new year. Let's hope we can put some of these mysteries to bed in 2013. :tu:

Why would you want to do that?  The deeper, the richer, the more fascinating surely?  That's not saying we need to invent.  

It's going to be extremely difficult to get to the bottom of the stones mystery.  I get the sense that some are just starting to see that there may be more in it that they imagined.  That's excellent.

Posted Image


#3790    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 01 January 2013 - 11:18 AM

View PostSlave2Fate, on 01 January 2013 - 10:33 AM, said:

Or at least wait until the vitrification claim is substantiated. From a visual perspective there is no way to know if the vitrification was caused by heat or by chemicals or even if it is vitrification at all. The cart is well beyond the horse here.

If you look at all the relics it actually is.  See Seeder's post

http://www.unexplain...50#entry4603135

Posted Image


#3791    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    Is not a number!

  • Member
  • 9,454 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008

Posted 01 January 2013 - 12:08 PM

could the builders have chosen already vitrified rock to work with?


#3792    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 01 January 2013 - 01:13 PM

View PostWearer of Hats, on 01 January 2013 - 12:08 PM, said:

could the builders have chosen already vitrified rock to work with?

It's good that all lateral thinking avenues are being explored.  Take a look at this:

Posted Image

The shine only occurs on the vitrified parts.  Look at the 'snake' shelf.

There is another brilliant image from a video that I will try and find.

Be back in about 1 hour.

Posted Image


#3793    badeskov

badeskov

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 10,965 posts
  • Joined:27 Aug 2006

Posted 01 January 2013 - 02:44 PM

View PostLord Vetinari, on 01 January 2013 - 10:41 AM, said:

:st

How could you do that, 747? That is just not...right.

Cheers,
Badeskov

"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention to arrive safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming: Wow!! What a ride!". Said to to Dean Karnazes by a running buddy.

#3794    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009

Posted 01 January 2013 - 03:13 PM

View PostWearer of Hats, on 01 January 2013 - 12:08 PM, said:

could the builders have chosen already vitrified rock to work with?

Here are the pictures that I really wanted.  Showing vitification and non-vitrification.

Posted Image

Posted Image



Vitrified Rocks and Stones in the Inca Vestiges

Posted Image


#3795    Abramelin

Abramelin

    -

  • Member
  • 18,071 posts
  • Joined:07 May 2005

Posted 01 January 2013 - 03:19 PM

View Postzoser, on 01 January 2013 - 09:29 AM, said:

Hydracephalus doesn't make sense because it is a debilitating condition and doesn't produce the cone head effect.  Is he specifically talking about cone heads or other deformed skulls?  It all sounds highly theoretical anyway with no supporting evidence.



Why?   As I said it's the only theory that fits all the facts considering all the different types of relics.

Either he is lying, or he actually did study hundreds of skulls, of which many were deformed ones.

And based on that I trust his word more than that of a dentist or someone working in a museum.


"Hydracephalus doesn't make sense because it is a debilitating condition and doesn't produce the cone head effect.  Is he specifically talking about cone heads or other deformed skulls?  It all sounds highly theoretical anyway with no supporting evidence."

It does make sense if the headbinding was performed to correct the hydrocephalus, as he suggests. This headbinding would result in the huge coneheads that you think belong to either another and unknown human race, or aliens.

You, again, willfully ignore what I posted about his theory and how that explained the large coneheads and the smaller cone heads.

Add to that the fact that the DNA results are a year or more overdue (kind of suspicious if you ask me), and it makes his theory even more plausible.




.

Edited by Abramelin, 01 January 2013 - 03:29 PM.